• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

no religion is the only truth, but truth is found in them all

Brian2

Veteran Member
And what really does that mean? Does it mean you have to go hunt down and find where the train conductor is in order to give him your ticket to board the train? I believe in many people's minds that is how they imagine it is with God.

But what then happens when someone tells you that the conductor is inside you? Then it seems you would need to go inside first to find that where that inner Conductor is in you, in order to pass through to board that train.

Who is the Son, but the Manifestor of the Divine? And if all creation is a manifestation of the Divine through the Son, as scripture teaches, then the Son is in everything and everyone. So to say you have to go through the Son to find the Father, or the Formless Infinite God, then the injunction to look within is sound. Wouldn't it be?

If Jesus is inside you then you are already going through Him, for everyone else they have to go through Him after they die at the judgement when He will be the judge.
I don't know where the Bible teaches that the creation is a manifestation of the Divine.


That is only true from the perspective of the person's experience of God. It's not true from the perspective of God. God cannot possibly be literally dead inside of anyone, inasmuch as God doesn't have dead parts. God is Life itself. God is being itself. But metaphorically speaking, we may experience that God is absent, or dead in us, even though in reality that cannot be the case. It is only ourselves not seeing or recognizing and experiencing that Life in us.

Think of what David said, "Take not your Spirit from me". From the perspective of his experience of the Presence of God, it would seem like God left him because of his sin. But in actual reality, it is only David who turned his face away from that which is always there. It's like saying take not the sun in the sky away from me. The only way the sun can be taken away, is for you to turn your face away from it, or hide inside of a cave and keep yourself from seeing it. It's always there. It doesn't go anywhere.

Take that very human expression and put it up against this psalm from David as well, where he cleary recognizes the impossibly of God not being everywhere fully at all times.

Where can I flee from your presence? If I go up to the heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there. even there your hand will guide me, your right hand will hold me fast. even the darkness will not be dark to you; the night will shine like the day, for darkness is as light to you.​

All of this perspective of seeing God as outside of ourselves, is simply the human perspective of their personal experience of the Presence of the Divine or the lack thereof. If you can't see God, it's not because God isn't there 100% of the time. It's that your not seeing it. That's all.

David was a prophet and was anointed with the Holy Spirit but imo was not born again of God. That did not happen till after the death and resurrection of Jesus and giving of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. God is present inside everyone because God is everywhere but when someone is born again that person has become a child of God and the Spirit has a different role in that person.


That Presence cannot ever be less of more, controlled like some bucket with a water faucet pouring in more or less of God. All of that is simply an expression of humans opening themselves to what is fully there all the time, or closing themselves off from it.

It's just human language to speak of God coming and going, which is really themselves seeing and not seeing. They externalize their own actions upon God's actions, rather than on their own. The reality is, the onus of of it all is upon them.

Like my analogy about how God is not a block of Swiss cheese with gaps or holes in it where God does not exist, which is an impossibility if God is understood as Infinite, then likewise you don't have "more of God and less of God", in actuality. God is not lumpy. God is not thinned out in places, more here, and less there. God is not a blob which has more accumulated mass in some areas and less in others. God is not material.

When we think of God in terms like that, coming and going, more here, and less there, these are ALL anthropomorphic projections upon God. They are simply ways to talk about God, the way we might about any some of physical creature in our experience of the world, like a tub of water, or a person on the bus sitting next to us. Those are simply mental devices. But when we mistake those as the actuality of what God is, then we confuse ourselves.

There are in fact special ways that God manifests to us. But it isn't God doing something special towards us. It's us opening up in a special way towards God. What really happens, is we open to God and let what has been there in full glory the entire time, to shine through and been seen and experienced. That special manifestation, is actually a special moment for us to see what is there all the time, seen but not seen.

God poured out His Spirit at Pentecost, not as just a presence but as the Spirit that united the person to Jesus spiritually as part of His body and the church and joined to each other as one body and church.
That opening of ourselves is when we accept Jesus as our Lord and Saviour. It is then that we are given the Spirit of adoption to be children of God and the Spirit works differently in us.

Same thing. We see God when we are ready to see God. It's not that God isn't there, and then is there later! :) How can any of that be possible in reality if God is omnipresent? It would mean God is finite and can come and go lack any other created creature, like a dog or a cat.

That wouldn't be God then. That would be "a god". Do you really view God as a god? That's something to think about.

God is present everywhere always BUT it is up to God to reveal Himself to us and not a work that we can accomplish by ourselves just looking within. The door is Jesus, not our own efforts.

So are you saying you do believe God is a god, a limited creature of sorts that is not Infinite and omnipresent? Do you really mean to say that God is not in some places, at some times, but comes and goes and moves around as if God has a body, a form and a shape of some kind with an inside and an outside?

But to the more salient question you ask, "why bother" to look if God is there all the time anyway. The answer is incredibly simple. So you can see God who is there all the time that you aren't seeing right in front of your face. So you may experience that Ultimate Reality! That's why! :)

It's like believing you have nothing, only to open your eyes and see you've have everything all along the whole time. You were only ever lost in your darkened imagination. The "why bother" to look, is so you can be free to know and to love and to enjoy what has been yours the whole time. The why bother, is to for you to find Peace. Even though it's there the whole time, that doesn't mean that you are accessing it for yourself. Cleary, most of our lives were aren't!

Moses could have looked at the bush for years and not seen anything and not heard anything. It is when God wanted to reveal Himself to Moses. God wants to reveal Himself to all of us but through Jesus. That is what the Bible teaches. The Father draws us to the Son and the Son, the one who knows the Father, reveals Him to us.

But we cling to those, because we self-identify with them and call them a part of ourselves, as if they were a limb attached to our bodies. But the more we are willing to face that fire of God, so to speak, the more fully we experience that Infinite that is fully there at all times. It's solely up to us to open that faucet and let it flow. It's not up to God. It's up to us.

Christians have a cooperative relationship with God and we do try to cooperate with what He is doing in and with us. But we cannot force God to reveal Himself.


I agree with this. And the more we can quite it, and the more we surrender, the greater that Light is allowed to be seen and enter into us, as I just said above, up to the point of "take off thy sandals" moments, and beyond, entering into the Holy of Holies, and such. There are no limits to God. Only us who limit God to ourselves.

It is God who sent Jesus so that He can be the door to the Father, to the Holy of Hollies. Whatever we experience before we have Jesus is not God. But God is pleased when people search for Him of course.


There are different ways we experience the Presence of God, is a better way to put it I believe. And of course it is God in us. It becomes a "thy will not mine be done" moment, where I am no more, and all there is is God.

Editing to add:

I'm going to add a quick thought to this question of why it is necessary to look within, as opposed to seeking without in order to find God. Where do you exist? Out there somewhere outside yourself? Do we look all around the house to find ourselves somewhere?

Many do. They try to find themselves in others. They try to find themselves in objects. They try to find themselves in images of the ideal person they want to be. But the one seeking to find themselves, is inside themselves the whole time, simply externalizing themselves in order to see themselves as an object that the subject can try to understand, as if looking into a mirror held in their hands.

Same thing with thinking of God as "out there". God is an internal subjective relational experience. Even if we were to meet God on a bus as a person outside ourselves, it is still the subjective experience of that other that becomes a part of ourselves.

My mother, is a part of me, for instance. If I want to find what my mother is to me, I look into my own heart. I can say this particularly now that she is no longer living in the physical form she had in this life. I can't call her on the phone and talk to her outside of myself. I can't sit with her and see her face now. And it is the same with God, really. Since God doesn't have a body, we seek God in our hearts, like I hold my mother's love in my own heart. It's kind of like that in a way.

Think about that particularly about what Jesus said about leaving you, yet "I am with you always, even to the ends of the earth". Where is that, but inside? And what is experienced inside, opens us to see that Love in all that exists, in the entire universe. It's all about our own set of eyes being opened. And the only way to open your eyes, is to subjectively open them. Look within.

Just processing some thoughts to this. Hopefully that makes some degree of sense to others.

The more we open ourselves to God the better for sure but you seem to be saying that the same born again experience is open to all.
 

muhammad_isa

Well-Known Member
If you trust the modern scholarship then you trust people who do not accept miracles or prophecies..
I don't agree.
Modern scholarship, as we might find in wikipedia, is peer reviewed by believers and disbelievers alike.
Wikipedia is not perfect .. no historical account can be.
 

muhammad_isa

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but Jesus was speaking to His disciples when he said that nobody can come to the Father but through the Son. (John 14:6)
Right .. he was preaching to Jewish disciples..
You quote a single verse, as if that is the core of faith.

i.e. if you don't come "through" Jesus, then you cannot succeed
..and he is God and what not..

but reading the whole chapter gives a more accurate impression of the correct interpretation .. it usually does .. context !
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
no religion is the only truth, but truth is found in them all

Do you agree og disagree?

I believe religions may vary without altering the truth. I believe Jesus is the Truth but I wouldn't call Jesus a religion. I believe belief in Him is a religious belief.
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
If Jesus is inside you then you are already going through Him, for everyone else they have to go through Him after they die at the judgement when He will be the judge.
If they are genuinely experiencing God, or the Divine to use a different term for it, then they must be going through that Door, as you understand that to be. If that's the Way to God, and they are coming to God, then they must be going through that Way. Just because it may not be happening the way you think it should be, doesn't mean God's ways are limited to your ways of thinking about it, does it?

I don't know where the Bible teaches that the creation is a manifestation of the Divine.
I can help you out with that. Let's start with John 1:1

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.​

To try to keep this simple, the Word, is the Logos. This Logos is that agency through which God reveals or manifests Himself. All creation is a manifestation of God. It says it right there, that All things were made through the Logos, or the Expression or Expressor, or Manifesting Agent of the Divine, taking the invisible, formless Godhead, and manifesting it into form. All form. Anything that can be known of God, is made known, is manifest through this Logos, the Agent of Manifestation.

This is how the author of John was using it borrowing from Philo of Alexandria's Logos. So when John has the Logos becoming flesh in verse 14, he is saying that this eternal, Divine manifesting agent of God, took on the form of a human and we all could see the glory of this Logos of God in the person of Jesus. Thus the Logos continues his divine role as Manifestor of God, on earth as the perfect human form.

Now compare this view of creation as a manifestation of God with other authors of the Bible. David again in Psalm 19.

The heavens declare the glory of God;
the skies proclaim the work of his hands.
Day after day they pour forth speech;
night after night they reveal knowledge.
They have no speech, they use no words;
no sound is heard from them.
Yet their voice goes out into all the earth,
their words to the ends of the world.​

That is clearly creation as a manifestation of the Divine. It reveals God's glory moment to moment. Take this with what Jesus taught about the lilies of the field,

"Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these."​

Clearly again, even the most simple forms of creation, manifest the Beauty and Glory of God, infinitely beyond the highest expressions of the ego's glory of man in his idea of power and glory. Creation again, is a clear manifestation of God.

While I can continue with much more, I'll just toss one last one in here for the moment. Paul in Romans 1:20:

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse​

Even his eternal power and Godhead. That is exactly what John 1:1-5 is teaching about the Logos revealing, or manifesting God through creation, and in human form as a continuation of that role or function as the eternal manifestor of God.

Note here how Paul is saying that people everywhere, at all times, regardless if they have a preacher telling them things to believe in about God, can in fact see and know God without them, through creation itself? Keep that in mind.

David was a prophet and was anointed with the Holy Spirit but imo was not born again of God.
I'm honestly not sure how someone could be in touch with the Holy Spirit within themselves, and not be "born again". That doesn't make any sense to me. To be honest, I believe the metaphor of Jesus about being "born again", is simply to describe being spiritually Awakened, where we become a "new creature", as Paul puts it. It's point to actual transformation of mind and spirit and body, not just becoming a so-called "believer".

There are plenty of those who 'believe' in Jesus, but are anything but actually 'born again'. They are just the same old egos, except adding "I believe in Jesus" to their list of self-identifications. That's not really truely surrendering, dying to the ego self and rising to the new Awakened spiritual self, whis is what 'born again' really means. Joining Club Jesus, doesn't make anyone actually born again. It's not a group membership thing.

So, was David spiritually transformed, which is what the metaphor of born again means? I'd say so. Wouldn't you? I mean, after all, his words are considered to be scripture, right? ;)

That did not happen till after the death and resurrection of Jesus and giving of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.
I'm familiar with the doctrine of the Pentecostals, as I am a former Pentecostal myself. I don't agree with them in that regard. I found their theology to be lacking.

God is present inside everyone because God is everywhere but when someone is born again that person has become a child of God and the Spirit has a different role in that person.
Now you are agreeing with my point I made from the beginning. It's not that God is not inside of them. It's that they simply are not seeing God.

When we realize the very being of God within us, then we become transformed into that image, not our ego-selves anymore. We die to the old self, and become the new creature manifesting that Divine nature within us, which comes from God or the Source of all creation.

That opening of ourselves is when we accept Jesus as our Lord and Saviour.
That opening of ourselves is when we quit looking to our own egos to find Peace and Ultimate truth and meaning in life, and open ourselves to the Divine. I would avoid this language of "accepting Jesus as our personal Lord and Savior" business that began with Billy Graham in the 1970's, as countless people take that to mean that just by simply deciding to become a Christian, by saying "I believe" that that constitutes being transformed or born again.

I chuckle a bit at that, as scripture says, "You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder." Simply believing, simply by "accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior", is not the thing which makes you a child of God. Being a child of God in practice, is what makes you a child of God. Otherwise, it is of no benefit to you or others. There is no inheritance, so to speak.

It is then that we are given the Spirit of adoption to be children of God and the Spirit works differently in us.
What would be true is if that act of faith, of actually opening themselves up to the Divine, is that it engages that part of themselves that is of God. It's engaging with that, interacting with that, opening to it, that is the transfomative power to actually become "children of God", in who and what we are.

Simply calling yourself a child of God because you claim belief in church doctrines, isn't the measure of that "adoption". "By their fruits you shall know them", Jesus taught. That's not to say they don't fauter and struggle against the ego, which of course we all do. But if their tree is barren of fruit, and it's all just "believerism", I wouldn't recognize them as authentically people of sincere faith.
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
(continued from previous post...)

God is present everywhere always BUT it is up to God to reveal Himself to us and not a work that we can accomplish by ourselves just looking within.
I'm glad you are acknowledging what I am saying here. This is good. But I would challenge this understanding that is "up to God to reveal Himself to us". That shifts the blame or responsibility over to God. Bear with me a minute here to try to explain this more carefully.

I agree with what you are saying about it is "not a work that we can accomplish by ourselves just looking within". There is the fine line between seeking God being an exercise of the ego to seek to gain for itself, and the act of seeking God in an act of surrendering to God the ego and all it's self-seeking. You are right to say, just simply looking within won't do it. It require looking within, facing the ego, dying to the ego, surrendering the ego, and opening to the Divine itself in order to "find God" within.

In other words, it absolutely is not by our own efforts that we "gain God". It is the exact opposite of that in fact. It is surrendering the ego, getting out of the way, that we find what has been there all along. So "seek and you shall find", is best understood as seek to not seek. Seek to stop trying to attain something for your ego. Seek rather to let go.

Now, with that intention in place, that is where the inner path will take you to finding God. Seek to let go and surrender, but looking within to your own intentions. You have to look at your motives. And that is done by looking within yourself. Read the whole of Psalm 139. That is a prayer of self examination. Look within, "search me" for any of those obstacles and blockages in myself that I may release them to find God.

Search me, God, and know my heart;
test me and know my anxious thoughts.
See if there is any offensive way in me,
and lead me in the way everlasting.​

That is the inner path. But it must not be motivated by the self-interests of the ego. It is seeking Love, for Love's sake, not for you own gain.

The door is Jesus, not our own efforts.
You are correct it is not our own efforts. The door is the Spirit of God. We enter into the realization of God, through self-surrender. The only effort we make, is to make no effort at all.

Moses could have looked at the bush for years and not seen anything and not heard anything. It is when God wanted to reveal Himself to Moses.
The reality is that God becomes revealed to us, when we are ready, not the other way around. I will grant that the timing of certain things may be more than just our own openness and receptivity, the "right time for us". It also may be other people who are "ready" as well. I mean, one could talk about that as when "God was ready", but see it more like when the right conditions were set, that's when it happens of its own accord.

But in reality, I have learned by experience that it's not really something like "waiting on God", as it is actually God waiting on us to be done doing whatever it is we are doing that keeps us from realizing God. God is ready all the time. It's us who aren't. That's the reality of it.

God wants to reveal Himself to all of us but through Jesus.
God does reveal himself to us through many ways. Creation itself reveals God. The teachings of Jesus reveal God. I can reveal God, when I am thus so aligned in my life. You can too. A child can. A bird can. A flower in the field can. Jesus did teach these things. "You are the light of the world". Who do you think he was talking to and what did that mean, other than saying we can and should reveal God?

Why are you limiting God to "only through Jesus". Scripture doesn't teach that.

That is what the Bible teaches. The Father draws us to the Son and the Son, the one who knows the Father, reveals Him to us.
I come back to the Logos. That was God manifesting himself into creation, and it is that creation itself that draws us to God. Further proof?

When I consider your heavens,
the work of your fingers,
the moon and the stars,
which you have set in place,
what is mankind that you are mindful of them,
human beings that you care for them?
It is through all of these ways that God draws us to him, isn't it? But you could call that the Son, if you wish. But don't limit that to just the flesh and blood human from Nazareth. I don't believe that is the best way to understand these things. Clearly, scripture paints a much larger picture than that.

Christians have a cooperative relationship with God and we do try to cooperate with what He is doing in and with us. But we cannot force God to reveal Himself.
Correct. You cannot force God to reveal himself, because he always already is! :) You can however face yourself and see why it is you aren't seeing God. That requires so honest self-examination and soul searching, or looking within, in other words.

It is God who sent Jesus so that He can be the door to the Father, to the Holy of Hollies.
The Logos has always been that Door, even before Jesus was born. People have experienced God long before the Christian church was born. Unless you want to believe they really didn't, that it was less than authentic in some way, for some reason or other?

Whatever we experience before we have Jesus is not God.
Whoa! What? Who are you to say this? Have you ever experienced God? I cannot imagine anyone who has limiting God like that. I can only imagine someone who simply believes in God and not ever actually having any sort of direct experience of the Divine, imagining that it "couldn't be God" for other people who aren't like themselves, because they have the real truth about God, and if they don't think like they do about God, how could it be God then.

My answer to that is to politely say, you are confused, and very wrong. I'd also say, that that lacks humility, and it also dictates to God who should and should not be a genuine child of God based upon your own theological views. Romans 14:4 "Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall"

If someone has claimed an experience of God, regardless of their affiliation with the Christian religion or not, the true test of that is to recognize the fruits that it has born in their lives. It is not, "by their beliefs you shall know them." Jesus taught it is, "by their fruits you shall know them". On what basis do you deny them their experience of God? Please try to explain.

But God is pleased when people search for Him of course.
Of course, God rewards all who seek him. Not just those in the Christian religion, as much as they may like to view themselves as the special chosen ones. "It was the Jews, but now it's us", misses the point of what Christianity was supposed to be about, which breaks down these religious divides of us and them that way.


The more we open ourselves to God the better for sure but you seem to be saying that the same born again experience is open to all.
Yes, I am saying that. Why not?
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
If they are genuinely experiencing God, or the Divine to use a different term for it, then they must be going through that Door, as you understand that to be. If that's the Way to God, and they are coming to God, then they must be going through that Way. Just because it may not be happening the way you think it should be, doesn't mean God's ways are limited to your ways of thinking about it, does it?

It's not a matter of God's ways being limited to my ways, it is a matter of my ways being limited to God's ways. Those who have Christ in them are Christians and everyone else goes through Jesus at the judgement. That is God's way.

I can help you out with that. Let's start with John 1:1

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.​

To try to keep this simple, the Word, is the Logos. This Logos is that agency through which God reveals or manifests Himself. All creation is a manifestation of God. It says it right there, that All things were made through the Logos, or the Expression or Expressor, or Manifesting Agent of the Divine, taking the invisible, formless Godhead, and manifesting it into form. All form. Anything that can be known of God, is made known, is manifest through this Logos, the Agent of Manifestation.

This is how the author of John was using it borrowing from Philo of Alexandria's Logos. So when John has the Logos becoming flesh in verse 14, he is saying that this eternal, Divine manifesting agent of God, took on the form of a human and we all could see the glory of this Logos of God in the person of Jesus. Thus the Logos continues his divine role as Manifestor of God, on earth as the perfect human form.

Now compare this view of creation as a manifestation of God with other authors of the Bible. David again in Psalm 19.

The heavens declare the glory of God;
the skies proclaim the work of his hands.
Day after day they pour forth speech;
night after night they reveal knowledge.
They have no speech, they use no words;
no sound is heard from them.
Yet their voice goes out into all the earth,
their words to the ends of the world.​

That is clearly creation as a manifestation of the Divine. It reveals God's glory moment to moment. Take this with what Jesus taught about the lilies of the field,

"Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these."​

Clearly again, even the most simple forms of creation, manifest the Beauty and Glory of God, infinitely beyond the highest expressions of the ego's glory of man in his idea of power and glory. Creation again, is a clear manifestation of God.

While I can continue with much more, I'll just toss one last one in here for the moment. Paul in Romans 1:20:

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse​

Even his eternal power and Godhead. That is exactly what John 1:1-5 is teaching about the Logos revealing, or manifesting God through creation, and in human form as a continuation of that role or function as the eternal manifestor of God.

Note here how Paul is saying that people everywhere, at all times, regardless if they have a preacher telling them things to believe in about God, can in fact see and know God without them, through creation itself? Keep that in mind.

Creation teaches about the power and intelligence etc of God but that does not mean that the creation is a manifestation of the Divine in the sense that the Hindu's have,,,,,,,,,,,,,, or do you disagree?


I'm honestly not sure how someone could be in touch with the Holy Spirit within themselves, and not be "born again". That doesn't make any sense to me. To be honest, I believe the metaphor of Jesus about being "born again", is simply to describe being spiritually Awakened, where we become a "new creature", as Paul puts it. It's point to actual transformation of mind and spirit and body, not just becoming a so-called "believer".

There are plenty of those who 'believe' in Jesus, but are anything but actually 'born again'. They are just the same old egos, except adding "I believe in Jesus" to their list of self-identifications. That's not really truely surrendering, dying to the ego self and rising to the new Awakened spiritual self, whis is what 'born again' really means. Joining Club Jesus, doesn't make anyone actually born again. It's not a group membership thing.

So, was David spiritually transformed, which is what the metaphor of born again means? I'd say so. Wouldn't you? I mean, after all, his words are considered to be scripture, right? ;)

The Holy Spirit does different things in different people. In David the Spirit empowered David to be a warrior and King and prophet. In Sampson the Spirit strengthened Sampson to go and fight the Philistines. In a Christian the Spirit joins that person to Jesus spiritually and to other Christians and changes them to become the image of Jesus and love God and neighbour etc and empowers them in whatever gift they have been given for the Church. In a non believer the Spirit draws that person to Jesus and to His teachings.

That opening of ourselves is when we quit looking to our own egos to find Peace and Ultimate truth and meaning in life, and open ourselves to the Divine. I would avoid this language of "accepting Jesus as our personal Lord and Savior" business that began with Billy Graham in the 1970's, as countless people take that to mean that just by simply deciding to become a Christian, by saying "I believe" that that constitutes being transformed or born again.

I chuckle a bit at that, as scripture says, "You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder." Simply believing, simply by "accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior", is not the thing which makes you a child of God. Being a child of God in practice, is what makes you a child of God. Otherwise, it is of no benefit to you or others. There is no inheritance, so to speak.

The whole gospel is what is needed. Not just a head belief in Jesus. That is watering down the gospel. But from belief the rest of the gospel stems. Throwing that out in favor of a more universalist approach is syncretism and misleading people about the teachings of Jesus.

What would be true is if that act of faith, of actually opening themselves up to the Divine, is that it engages that part of themselves that is of God. It's engaging with that, interacting with that, opening to it, that is the transfomative power to actually become "children of God", in who and what we are.

Simply calling yourself a child of God because you claim belief in church doctrines, isn't the measure of that "adoption". "By their fruits you shall know them", Jesus taught. That's not to say they don't fauter and struggle against the ego, which of course we all do. But if their tree is barren of fruit, and it's all just "believerism", I wouldn't recognize them as authentically people of sincere faith.

OK, but at the same time we must allow Jesus to be the judge of people.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
no religion is the only truth, but truth is found in them all

Do you agree og disagree?
Whether a religion is only truth or not is unknowable by mortal man. Humans have limited insight and cannot know absolute truth, which is necessary to know if a religion is the only truth. So your question is unanswerable.
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
It's not a matter of God's ways being limited to my ways, it is a matter of my ways being limited to God's ways.
But what seems to be God's way to me, goes against what seems to be God's way to you. As I said, when we limit what God can do to reflect our ideas of the way God does things, we limit God. That is the whole idea behind Paul's admonishment to Christians to not impose their beliefs about what God wants and doesn't want upon others.

I keep pointing to Romans 14, yet I find most Christians really don't get it. It seems to go into one ear and right out the other, yet it's really clear. I think that's because they are stuck doing just those things themselves, and don't want to see themselves being the subject of that chapter.

Those who have Christ in them are Christians and everyone else goes through Jesus at the judgement. That is God's way.
Can't Buddhists have Christ in them, even if they understand what that is differently in different terms, such as "Buddha mind", or "Buddha Nature"? Or must everyone call it by the right words, and it's the language that matters, not the nature of the spiritual experience itself?

Can't the Christian look at another person who is not a Christian, and in fact see "Christ in them"? Or recognize that what they are calling by another name is in fact the same thing that they themselves are talking about? I personally am able to do that. I don't get hung up on the words we call something. I look at the nature of it. I look at the fruits, as Jesus taught us to do.

Creation teaches about the power and intelligence etc of God but that does not mean that the creation is a manifestation of the Divine in the sense that the Hindu's have,,,,,,,,,,,,,, or do you disagree?
Well, that depends upon how you understand what the Hindus teach. I think there is a great deal of misunderstanding by Christians what the Hindus are actually saying (which I realize there is in fact great diversity within Hinduism itself alone). I think some people understand pantheism in the sense that God is the material world itself, for instance. It's a complex area to understand, and I think there is a great deal of misunderstanding about it.

From the Christian perspective, I see Creation as arising from the Divine as its Source. But I do not see the Source as separate from Creation either. I see God as both fully transcendent to the world of form, yet fully immanent within it. It's a paradoxical view. You do find that view expressed in Christian teachings historically, particularly by Christian mystics, but also within scripture itself, as I have already illustrated.

I do not care for this theology that sees creation as a "reflection" of God. It is much more than that. It is an expression of the Divine, into form. God manifests himself through creation, not bounced off or reflected against it. Those verses I quoted say this. It is an active manifesting, present continuous tense, not a passive echo of a past event in time.

Now, some Hindus may see it that way as well. Some Buddhists do as well. And all that does is confirm that there is in fact a mystical intuition, or realization about the nature of the Divine shared by the great sages and mystics of religions the world over. I do not limit God to one religion only. I believe do that is human hubris and arrogance. It's "I'm special and better than them'ism". Believing in God, is believing in God, in whatever way that person understands that to be.

The Holy Spirit does different things in different people. In David the Spirit empowered David to be a warrior and King and prophet. In Sampson the Spirit strengthened Sampson to go and fight the Philistines.
That's true of any human being where Spirit enacts their authentic individuality to be a unique expression of the Divine through them. Some become musical composers, others great teachers, others wonderful parents, etc.

In a non believer the Spirit draws that person to Jesus and to His teachings.
You're saying inspiration of the Spirit of God in people's lives, only happens when they join the Christian religion? Otherwise, it's only just their egos and nothing compared to Christian art and literature and music, and act and deeds of kindness and compassion? It's only valid and genuine if they are Christians first? You don't see a problem with this?

The whole gospel is what is needed. Not just a head belief in Jesus. That is watering down the gospel. But from belief the rest of the gospel stems. Throwing that out in favor of a more universalist approach is syncretism and misleading people about the teachings of Jesus.
Why is accepting that people outside of the Christian religion can and do have equally valid spiritual lives, if not even greater, to be throwing out what I just said about finding the inner path of surrendering the ego? If that is what they are doing, then they are in fact following the Gospel in actions, if not in name. It what they do that matters, not what they believe or say of the words or language or ideas about God they have and use.

Now as far as that term syncretism goes, do you understand what that is? It's a merging together of a new religion or culture by blending parts of other religions or culture into it. In reality, the Christian church itself is syncretic. What I am talking about is not syncretism, nor is it eclecticism either. Nor is it Universalism in the sense of Christian Universalism that everyone will eventually become Christians. It could be understood as universalism in the sense that the truth has many names. In that sense, sure. But why not?

Why does understanding that others understand these same spiritual principles that Jesus taught in different terms and contexts mislead people? What Jesus taught is valid. And the fact that others teach it as well, in fact validates it even more! It doesn't say, don't believe Jesus, believe Buddha instead. It doesn't invalidate Jesus to say that Buddha realized the same truths that Jesus taught. I don't understand what the issue is.

The only issue I can see is if you confuse the Christian religion as a entity, with Jesus himself. In other words, it's not really about following the things Jesus taught to do. It's about becoming a Christian in the religious sense. But then are you really believing in Jesus, or in Christianity?

OK, but at the same time we must allow Jesus to be the judge of people.
Then this means you are going to look at the fruits that others bear, regardless of their different beliefs and religions as the sole criteria, and leave the judging to God?
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
(continued from previous post...)


I'm glad you are acknowledging what I am saying here. This is good. But I would challenge this understanding that is "up to God to reveal Himself to us". ...................

That is the inner path. But it must not be motivated by the self-interests of the ego. It is seeking Love, for Love's sake, not for you own gain.

God wants to lead us forward in knowledge of Him and it is always for our own gain but is best if our motives are altruistic. But can we change our motives?

God does reveal himself to us through many ways. Creation itself reveals God. The teachings of Jesus reveal God. I can reveal God, when I am thus so aligned in my life. You can too. A child can. A bird can. A flower in the field can. Jesus did teach these things. "You are the light of the world". Who do you think he was talking to and what did that mean, other than saying we can and should reveal God?

Why are you limiting God to "only through Jesus". Scripture doesn't teach that.

Jesus speaks to Christians being the light of the world and so Jesus should shine from us.
Imo the closeness of a relationship to God is so much better for a Christian than others who are not God's children.

I come back to the Logos. That was God manifesting himself into creation, and it is that creation itself that draws us to God. Further proof?

When I consider your heavens,
the work of your fingers,
the moon and the stars,
which you have set in place,
what is mankind that you are mindful of them,
human beings that you care for them?
It is through all of these ways that God draws us to him, isn't it? But you could call that the Son, if you wish. But don't limit that to just the flesh and blood human from Nazareth. I don't believe that is the best way to understand these things. Clearly, scripture paints a much larger picture than that.

Jesus, being God, is so much bigger than just the man Jesus of Nazareth and He fills the whole universe.
In the scripture you used we are shown our insignificance in relation to God who nevertheless loves us. So we are shown truths about God. It is all to lead us to Christ and that close relationship.

Correct. You cannot force God to reveal himself, because he always already is! :) You can however face yourself and see why it is you aren't seeing God. That requires so honest self-examination and soul searching, or looking within, in other words.

But looking within at yourself and not at God within.

The Logos has always been that Door, even before Jesus was born. People have experienced God long before the Christian church was born. Unless you want to believe they really didn't, that it was less than authentic in some way, for some reason or other?

It was authentic but nobody was a born again child of God without the Spirit of adoption.

Whoa! What? Who are you to say this? Have you ever experienced God? I cannot imagine anyone who has limiting God like that. I can only imagine someone who simply believes in God and not ever actually having any sort of direct experience of the Divine, imagining that it "couldn't be God" for other people who aren't like themselves, because they have the real truth about God, and if they don't think like they do about God, how could it be God then.

My answer to that is to politely say, you are confused, and very wrong. I'd also say, that that lacks humility, and it also dictates to God who should and should not be a genuine child of God based upon your own theological views. Romans 14:4 "Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall"

If someone has claimed an experience of God, regardless of their affiliation with the Christian religion or not, the true test of that is to recognize the fruits that it has born in their lives. It is not, "by their beliefs you shall know them." Jesus taught it is, "by their fruits you shall know them". On what basis do you deny them their experience of God? Please try to explain.

I should not have denied anyone their experience with God. God has no doubt given many people who are not Christians or Jews, experience with Himself.

Of course, God rewards all who seek him. Not just those in the Christian religion, as much as they may like to view themselves as the special chosen ones. "It was the Jews, but now it's us", misses the point of what Christianity was supposed to be about, which breaks down these religious divides of us and them that way.

Jesus took away the law which divided and made the us and them, but the accepted gift of faith is a requirement for participation in the gospel. But I am not saying that those who are not Christians are automatically not saved in the final judgment. No doubt many non Christians live a better life than many Christians.

Yes, I am saying that. Why not?

For me it contradicts the teaching of the New Testament and so I understand the things you are saying in other ways and do not make the gospel irrelevant or the necessity to go through Jesus one way or the other.
 

Davi Carvalho

New Member
no religion is the only truth, but truth is found in them all

Do you agree og disagree?

The Bible shows in Romans 2:14-15 that God has put a moral law in the hearts of everyone. So the sense of good and bad, right or wrong is universal, whether if you serve God or not. This way, every religion man-made will hold some moral values, hence some truth. However, the whole truth can only be found in Jesus Christ, as He said in John 14:6: "Jesus answered: I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
no religion is the only truth, but truth is found in them all

Do you agree og disagree?
I would agree that you can find SOME truth in all religions. However, given their competing truth claims, they cannot all be completely true. I would say that some religions have more truth than others. For example, I'd really much rather a person not be an Aztec tearing out still beating hearts.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
But what seems to be God's way to me, goes against what seems to be God's way to you. As I said, when we limit what God can do to reflect our ideas of the way God does things, we limit God. That is the whole idea behind Paul's admonishment to Christians to not impose their beliefs about what God wants and doesn't want upon others.

I keep pointing to Romans 14, yet I find most Christians really don't get it. It seems to go into one ear and right out the other, yet it's really clear. I think that's because they are stuck doing just those things themselves, and don't want to see themselves being the subject of that chapter.

I don't think Romans 14 is about the same things we are talking about. Romans 14 is about judging fellow Christians in what they eat and drink and if they see certain days as days to be observed. We are talking more about whether a person who is not a Christian is in the same boat as a Christian. Has a non Christian got the Holy Spirit. Can they produce fruit of the Spirit.

Can't Buddhists have Christ in them, even if they understand what that is differently in different terms, such as "Buddha mind", or "Buddha Nature"? Or must everyone call it by the right words, and it's the language that matters, not the nature of the spiritual experience itself?

Can't the Christian look at another person who is not a Christian, and in fact see "Christ in them"? Or recognize that what they are calling by another name is in fact the same thing that they themselves are talking about? I personally am able to do that. I don't get hung up on the words we call something. I look at the nature of it. I look at the fruits, as Jesus taught us to do.

Sure non christians can keep the requirements of the Law and of God imo but they cannot have the fruits of the Spirit when they don't have the Spirit.

Well, that depends upon how you understand what the Hindus teach. I think there is a great deal of misunderstanding by Christians what the Hindus are actually saying (which I realize there is in fact great diversity within Hinduism itself alone). I think some people understand pantheism in the sense that God is the material world itself, for instance. It's a complex area to understand, and I think there is a great deal of misunderstanding about it.

From the Christian perspective, I see Creation as arising from the Divine as its Source. But I do not see the Source as separate from Creation either. I see God as both fully transcendent to the world of form, yet fully immanent within it. It's a paradoxical view. You do find that view expressed in Christian teachings historically, particularly by Christian mystics, but also within scripture itself, as I have already illustrated.

I do not care for this theology that sees creation as a "reflection" of God. It is much more than that. It is an expression of the Divine, into form. God manifests himself through creation, not bounced off or reflected against it. Those verses I quoted say this. It is an active manifesting, present continuous tense, not a passive echo of a past event in time.

Now, some Hindus may see it that way as well. Some Buddhists do as well. And all that does is confirm that there is in fact a mystical intuition, or realization about the nature of the Divine shared by the great sages and mystics of religions the world over. I do not limit God to one religion only. I believe do that is human hubris and arrogance. It's "I'm special and better than them'ism". Believing in God, is believing in God, in whatever way that person understands that to be.

Believing in God is believing in God but faith in Jesus as God's Son and our Saviour is not believing in God, it goes further.
Imo the scriptures you posted do not show divinity in the creation.
Humanity was made in God's image and we all have that image to a certain extent so we can see Christ in all people to an extent but that does not make all religious teachings into the truth.


That's true of any human being where Spirit enacts their authentic individuality to be a unique expression of the Divine through them. Some become musical composers, others great teachers, others wonderful parents, etc.

Sure we are human and have human capacities and some can be musicians or teachers etc


You're saying inspiration of the Spirit of God in people's lives, only happens when they join the Christian religion? Otherwise, it's only just their egos and nothing compared to Christian art and literature and music, and act and deeds of kindness and compassion? It's only valid and genuine if they are Christians first? You don't see a problem with this?

I think the Spirit was poured out on all flesh after Jesus and the Spirit has a hand in bringing people to Jesus and imo in leading them to live lives in accordance with the teachings of Jesus.
I don't see art and music etc as part of what the Spirit inspires in non Christians.

Why is accepting that people outside of the Christian religion can and do have equally valid spiritual lives, if not even greater, to be throwing out what I just said about finding the inner path of surrendering the ego? If that is what they are doing, then they are in fact following the Gospel in actions, if not in name. It what they do that matters, not what they believe or say of the words or language or ideas about God they have and use.

Now as far as that term syncretism goes, do you understand what that is? It's a merging together of a new religion or culture by blending parts of other religions or culture into it. In reality, the Christian church itself is syncretic. What I am talking about is not syncretism, nor is it eclecticism either. Nor is it Universalism in the sense of Christian Universalism that everyone will eventually become Christians. It could be understood as universalism in the sense that the truth has many names. In that sense, sure. But why not?

Why does understanding that others understand these same spiritual principles that Jesus taught in different terms and contexts mislead people? What Jesus taught is valid. And the fact that others teach it as well, in fact validates it even more! It doesn't say, don't believe Jesus, believe Buddha instead. It doesn't invalidate Jesus to say that Buddha realized the same truths that Jesus taught. I don't understand what the issue is.

The only issue I can see is if you confuse the Christian religion as a entity, with Jesus himself. In other words, it's not really about following the things Jesus taught to do. It's about becoming a Christian in the religious sense. But then are you really believing in Jesus, or in Christianity?

I can see what you are saying about people following the truth in their particular religion and so will be judged on that, Jesus and His words being the truth.
However being a Christian is about that and about the Spirit of Truth living in us, it is about having Jesus in us,,,,,,,,,,,,,, the hope of glory.
Col 1:27 To them God has chosen to make known among the Gentiles the glorious riches of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory. 28 We proclaim Him, admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom, so that we may present everyone perfect in Christ.…
Christians are the royal priesthood for teaching the truth, and the salt and light of the earth to spread some light around. To keep people on track according to the truth, when they are going astray. True we have not fulfilled our rolls really well over the years probably but that does not negate the truth of it.

Then this means you are going to look at the fruits that others bear, regardless of their different beliefs and religions as the sole criteria, and leave the judging to God?

We all need to do that but at the same time to be that light and priesthood and no doubt that sometimes involves speaking to people about their lifestyle and deeds in relation to how the gospels tells us we should live.
 

muhammad_isa

Well-Known Member
I can see what you are saying about people following the truth in their particular religion and so will be judged on that, Jesus and His words being the truth.
What about me then?
Will I be "alright" ?

I believe that Jesus' words are the truth .. but I do not believe in creeds and dogma, that are voted in by Bishops, as necessarily being the truth. :)
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
What about me then?
Will I be "alright" ?

I believe that Jesus' words are the truth .. but I do not believe in creeds and dogma, that are voted in by Bishops, as necessarily being the truth. :)

By following the truth it was more of a following the morals of the gospel thing than believing in Jesus and whom the Bible tells us He is and why He came to earth.
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
God wants to lead us forward in knowledge of Him and it is always for our own gain but is best if our motives are altruistic. But can we change our motives?
Yes, we can change our motives. That's the very point of looking inward. As Psalm 139 petitions God to examine his heart for impure motives, that is a prayer of openness, or surrender asking to see in ourselves whatever hinders us from spiritual release. It is asking God to illuminate these areas for us to see and understand and surrender.

What I am talking about seeking for the sake of the ego, versus seeking for the sake of God, is not altruism. It's seeking authentic Truth for its own sake, as an act of authentic love. We lead with our spiritual intention. That's what this inward path does, is to shed light upon all these hidden places in ourselves where our ulterior, self-seeking and self-serving desires in service of the ego and its needs lay.

To expose these to the Light, is a frightening thing. It is as Paul says, that in that day, "I will know even as I am known". It's being laid bare and facing all those things in ourselves we disown or try to protect from exposure, even to our very own consciousness minds. Or should I say, particularity to our own conscious minds?

It's difficult to describe this, but if you have ever had any sort of direct confrontation in these deep interior spaces within us with that very Light of the Divine itself, what I'm saying would be easily recognized. We don't really understand ourselves on the inside.

That is why practices that take you inside, such as a contemplative prayer, or meditation, are critically important to spiritual growth and development. People don't realize what is hiding in the deep recesses of their own psyches that hinder and block themselves spiritually.

Jesus speaks to Christians being the light of the world and so Jesus should shine from us.
Imo the closeness of a relationship to God is so much better for a Christian than others who are not God's children.
Actually, Jesus spoke to his disciples, not to Christians from some local church. ;) There is a difference here. And anyone who follows the path to spiritual liberation that Jesus taught, is his discipline. "For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.”

He does not specify which religious group they belong to. If you meet a Samaritan who worships on a different mountain, or a Buddhist who meditates under a tree, or a Hindu in his temple, or a Roman who loves God under a different name, and they are doing naturally the will of the Father, then they are in fact following Jesus, even if they have never heard of him. That's who Jesus recognizes as family. That's what he says.

But looking within at yourself and not at God within.
Not exactly what I meant. You look within to examine your own heart and soul before God, to find that which creates obstacles to liberation in God. When those obstacles are removed, you find God within your own heart and soul, and then from there, you see God in all the world, from there you are transformed from the inside to the outside, just as Jesus said, "Make clean the inside of the cup first, then the outside will become clean".

Let's take Jesus teaching on the two greatest commandments. The first is "love God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength." That means you connect with your inner person. All of those, your heart, your mind, your soul, and your strength, are interior, subjective realities.

So look within. Go within. Open yourself from within, to God, to the Divine, to the Source, to Spirit, and then you become transformed from the inside first, which then naturally flows outward to the outside as expressions of that new, transformed inner reality. And the 2nd commandment becomes the natural byproduct of the first. You naturally will love your neighbor as yourself, because you have been made a vessel of love.

That is why you look inside. That is why you search the heart. That is why you practice meditation. You have to first encounter and engage with the Divine within you, in order to "Make clean the inside of the cup first."

It was authentic but nobody was a born again child of God without the Spirit of adoption.
This doesn't make any spiritual sense at all. If anyone has an authentic encounter and transformation though the Divine, they are born again. That's what born again means. It means rebirth into a new spiritual awakened person. If that happened, then that's happened.

Being "born again" is not some legal status thing on a piece of paper or some idea in a preacher's minds. It is an experiential reality. If they don't have that experiential reality yet, then I'd say keep searching their life for those obstacles within them that block that transformation from happening. If you have been transformed in actual experiential lived reality (not an idea on paper), then that is the Spirit of adoption. You recognize yourself and are recognized as a child of God, or the Divine.

I should not have denied anyone their experience with God. God has no doubt given many people who are not Christians or Jews, experience with Himself.
Thank you for retracting that statement. And if they have that experience, and if they follow that experience and seek God in their own ways as best they can, as we all do, regardless of the religion they were born into, then "God is no respecter of persons", meaning God doesn't say you have to part of the "right religion", in order to be following that Truth which is apparent to everyone through the Creation, through Nature herself.

"Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law." ~Ro. 2:14​

Even though they do not have the Christian religion, they are fulfilling the Law of the Divine in themselves. Even Jesus said of the pagan Roman Centurion, that he had greater faith than anyone he had seen in all of Israel. He embraced his faith more than all those of his own religion, even though he was as many would say, "in the wrong religion". Jesus transcended religion. God transcends religion.

Jesus took away the law which divided and made the us and them, but the accepted gift of faith is a requirement for participation in the gospel.
That's exactly right. Then why are Christians saying that these people of other religions need to convert to the Christian religion, when Christ himself recognized the faith of others in other religions? It's about faith in God, not religious membership. Faith transcends religious identities. It exists in all religions, in all cultures, and in all humans, if listened to within themselves.

But I am not saying that those who are not Christians are automatically not saved in the final judgment. No doubt many non Christians live a better life than many Christians.
This is true that many non Christians are more "Christians" than even Christians are! Meaning, they are about truth and sincerity and love and compassion from the heart, instead of leaning upon their religious identities and associations. "Greater faith have I not seen in all of Israel," said Jesus about the pagan Roman centurion.

But I would try to shift your thinking away from this "final judgement" thinking. "Salvation", is not some future thing, but a present reality in every moment. We are either living life spiritually awakened, or we are not. That's what is important. That's what matters. And some future judgement, in however you want to understand that, is happening cumulatively in every moment.

Focusing on the future, is a distraction, an avoidance, to living life in the present. One of my favorite verses of the Bible is when Jesus says, "I am come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly". It's that abundant living, in the present continuous tense, that is the real "salvation".

It is living life in freedom. That is the spiritual life. And who we are today, how we have cultivated the soil of our lives, digging into the soil, looking within, that allows that spiritual reality to grow and flourish and determine that future "final judgement".

Spirituality, a spiritual life is something we must participate within. It doesn't happen to us from outside of us. It grows from within us, from the Divine as the Source, as us tending to the stones and weeds in our inner gardens where spirituality grows outward, from the inside of the cup, to the outside.

For me it contradicts the teaching of the New Testament and so I understand the things you are saying in other ways and do not make the gospel irrelevant or the necessity to go through Jesus one way or the other.
I think you read that coming through Jesus, or the Christ, means converting to the religion in his name. Do you believe the religion to be the Door instead?
 
Last edited:

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I don't think Romans 14 is about the same things we are talking about. Romans 14 is about judging fellow Christians in what they eat and drink and if they see certain days as days to be observed. We are talking more about whether a person who is not a Christian is in the same boat as a Christian. Has a non Christian got the Holy Spirit. Can they produce fruit of the Spirit.
Alright. While Romans 14 is talking to Christians about the correct attitudes they should have towards one another in their differences within the church body, do you believe that attitude should end at the door of the church and not apply to everyone in their own spiritual attitudes of their hearts to the world at large? Think about that for minute.

How is it spiritually wrong to judge your fellow Christian in your heart, but not spiritually wrong to judge others outside the church? Judging is judging. And like unforgiveness, it harms the one doing it primarily, regardless who the object of their unforgiveness, or attitudes of judgements are directed. Not doing those things, means it's unhealthy for yourself and for those you do it to, regardless of whether they are those you call your friends or not.

So, as I read Romans 14, I see it as a spiritual attitude everyone should take. Who are we to judge where someone is at in their relationship with God, or their spiritual path? For the same reasons we might not understand why someone thinks not eating pork is important to their faith, but we should recognize that they are sincere in their belief and are otherwise doing the will of God by "loving their neighbor as themselves", I think it more than wise to not pass judgments on others who themselves have different ideas about God, like that fellow Christian with his beliefs about certain holy days, or those who belong to other religions with their own different ideas about God just as well.

The bottom line is, it is not who has the right beliefs, but who has the true faith in their hearts. Who bears spiritual fruit? If they are bearing fruit, then who is it about to try to get them to change their ideas about God to match your own? Isn't that about the ego instead?

Sure non christians can keep the requirements of the Law and of God imo but they cannot have the fruits of the Spirit when they don't have the Spirit.
And then since they do have the fruits of the Spirit, then with your argument, you must acknowledge that they do in fact have the Spirit. Then we are in agreement. They cannot produce the fruits of the Spirit without the Spirit. And since they do produce the fruits, they have the Spirit within them.

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
I'll repeat that again. Since they are in fact bearing fruit like this in other religions, this is evidence that they do in fact have the Spirit within them. "A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit," said Jesus. If they are bringing forth good fruit, then they are a good tree. "You shall know them by their fruits". That's the focus. You don't judge a book by its cover. You judge it by the value of the content within its pages.

Believing in God is believing in God but faith in Jesus as God's Son and our Saviour is not believing in God, it goes further.
I always say their is a difference between spirituality and faith, and beliefs. The deeper one goes in faith, the more we see how beliefs divide, yet Love unites. Faith is about the heart. It's about Love.

Imo the scriptures you posted do not show divinity in the creation.
Again, what do you understand that to mean when I say that creation is an expression or a manifestation of the Divine? The Divine is manifest through creation. It is revealed and exposed through creation. "Through" is the word used in those verses I quoted, and it is how I understand that to be.

Let me give a simple analogy. You see letters on a page. The letters are lines and shapes that have certain unique forms that you learn to recognize and combine into patterns that convey meaning to you. Right? But those lines or forms only have existence or any reality at all, because they have the paper they are printed on, or the white space on your screen. Without that formless backdrop, form would not exist let alone have any meaning. You cannot see black letters on a black background, can you?

God, or the Source, or the Ground of Being, is formlessness itself. In Christian parlance, the Logos is that mediating principle, that Thought, that Word, that Idea, that takes that Formless Source, and manifests it into form. All creation arises from or out of that Formless Source, or Godhead, or "The Father", through that Logos, as the mediator between formlessness and form, into the material world of form. Or you could say letters on a page.

So when I say God is manifest through form, I mean just that. It's not that the letters, or the forms themselves are God as Godhead itself. But they are not separate from God, just as the letters on a page are not separate from the page they are written upon.

They are inextricably united. The letters have no existence without the emptiness or formlessness of the page. And if one hopes to understand the nature of God, we have to see that God is much more than just letters on a page, or words in a holy book. Reality is both form and formlessness.

I more than easily see this within those passages I quoted for you. God is revealed through everything in Creation itself. All form arises from the Formless, though that mediator between formlenesses and form, that "Son" or the Logos", which is the Divine itself manifesting, and mediating between "man and God", or formlessness and form.

Now interestingly enough, you find this same Christian understanding of the Divine, of creation within Hinduism and Buddhism and Taoism as well. These are mystical realization about the nature of the Divine Reality, or God, upon which various teachings come from, such as the gospel of John.

Humanity was made in God's image and we all have that image to a certain extent so we can see Christ in all people to an extent but that does not make all religious teachings into the truth.
Of course not all religious teachings lead into the Truth. Just look at the teachings of the Westboro Baptist church and the Phelps family as one glaring example of that! Clearly, no one religion has all the truth. Each has a piece of that Truth. As I say, God transcends religions.

I can see what you are saying about people following the truth in their particular religion and so will be judged on that, Jesus and His words being the truth.
However being a Christian is about that and about the Spirit of Truth living in us, it is about having Jesus in us,,,,,,,,,,,,,, the hope of glory.
And the Buddhists understand this as their Buddha nature, or Buddha mind. Christians call it Christ Consciousness. Hindus call it the Atman. It's different fingers all pointing to the same Realization.

We all need to do that but at the same time to be that light and priesthood and no doubt that sometimes involves speaking to people about their lifestyle and deeds in relation to how the gospels tells us we should live.
I think it's an error to focus on someone's so-called "lifestyle". I can easily see that being what Paul was talking about in Romans 14, focusing on the superficial exterior differences as if that is what God actually cares about, which God really doesn't. I've known plenty of "perfect lifestyle" Christians who are as Jesus called others like that, as "whitewashed tombs, all clean and white on the outside but full of dead rotting bones inside."

I personally look to the heart of the person, not their dress, not their styles, not the language, not their religious symbols, not their religious identities. That I believe to be is how God see everyone, as "no respecter of persons". It's what's in the heart that is the Truth or not. "By their fruits you shall know them".
 

muhammad_isa

Well-Known Member
Believing in God is believing in God but faith in Jesus as God's Son and our Saviour is not believing in God, it goes further..
It IS believing in God .. through Jesus Christ.

Jews believe in God through Moses.
Muslims believe in God through Muhammad.
Peace be on all three.

All praise is for God .. I believed in God through Jesus, and this was strengthened by faith through Muhammad as well.

I am known as Muhammad Isa.
.. i.e. Muhammad Jesus :D
 
Top