• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is the Republican Party suffering a complete moral collapse?

Is the Republican Party suffering a complete moral collapse?

  • Yes

    Votes: 10 27.0%
  • No

    Votes: 14 37.8%
  • I don't know

    Votes: 4 10.8%
  • They never had a moral center

    Votes: 9 24.3%

  • Total voters
    37

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
A couple of days ago, Donald Trump hosted anti-Semitic and racists Nick Fuentes and Kanye (Ye) West at dinner. Only a couple of Republicans have expressed any negative feelings about a exPOTUS doing such a thing.

In Arizona, today is the last day to certify that last election. Not all Arizona counties are willing to do this -- those who think Republicans should have won -- NO MATTER WHAT THE VOTERS THOUGHT.

Republicans are trying to make it harder for certain minorities (you know, the ones that don't consistently vote Repulican) to vote.

It's endless. It never stops. I can only think that the party that believes itself to be the religious heart of America has simply suffered a total moral collapse -- I suspect because morals are more expendable than power.

I await your vote, and your reasons.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
A couple of days ago, Donald Trump hosted anti-Semitic and racists Nick Fuentes and Kanye (Ye) West at dinner. Only a couple of Republicans have expressed any negative feelings about a exPOTUS doing such a thing.

In Arizona, today is the last day to certify that last election. Not all Arizona counties are willing to do this -- those who think Republicans should have won -- NO MATTER WHAT THE VOTERS THOUGHT.

Republicans are trying to make it harder for certain minorities (you know, the ones that don't consistently vote Repulican) to vote.

It's endless. It never stops. I can only think that the party that believes itself to be the religious heart of America has simply suffered a total moral collapse -- I suspect because morals are more expendable than power.

I await your vote, and your reasons.

I think Trumpism is starting to collapse beneath its own weight.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
No. Trump is not the Republican party.
I presume that the <yes> votes are by posters
who see different moral values as "moral collapse",
eg, anti-abortion.
This differs from viewing more widely agreed
immorality of some of Trump's acts, eg, revenge
against people he sees as political foes.
 
Last edited:

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I think Trumpism is starting to collapse beneath its own weight.

No.
Trump's cult appears to be evaporating.

Yes, the the way it is collapsing, or the reason it is collapsing is all the more evidence of the moral collapse of the Republican Party.

Trump is losing support not because of anything he has said or done, but simply because he cannot win elections anymore. If the Republican Party had a moral centre they would have dumped Trump long ago.

Don't kid yourselves. It they thought they could still win with Trump, they would be lining up behind him and singing his praises.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Yes, the the way it is collapsing, or the reason it is collapsing is all the more evidence of the moral collapse of the Republican Party.

Trump is losing support not because of anything he has said or done, but simply because he cannot win elections anymore. If the Republican Party had a moral centre they would have dumped Trump long ago.

Don't kid yourselves. It they thought they could still win with Trump, they would be lining up behind him and singing his praises.
If Trump gets support because they see him as
a winner, this could be moral due to the alternative,
ie, a Democrat, who'd be worse. This is similar to
Dem support for Bill Clinton, eg, feminists who
looked the other way when he abused women.

But consider why Trump is weaker, which could be
due to getting fed up with his immorality, eg, the
insurrection. This would contra-indicate moral
collapse.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I presume that the <yes> votes are by posters
who see different moral values as "moral collapse",
eg, anti-abortion.
Presume all you like, but I do not see anti-abortion views as "moral collapse." I might think it is misguided, by my lights, because it (usually) considers one thing and one thing only -- the life of an "unborn child."

When I used the term "moral collapse," I meant (Christ-like as I am well known to be :rolleyes:) forgetting to treat others as we would like to be treated.

I ask you, how many Republicans would like a law that made it harder for them to vote? Would they think it fair? And when they do it to others, do they chalk this up under "treat thy neighbor as thyself?" How many Republicans, do you suppose, would like to be villified because of their coloration, their height, their religious beliefs, their desire to have control over their own lives? And if they then support an anti-semite, who thinks....

Oh, drop it. Never mind. This kind of thing can go on endlessly.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Presume all you like...
I have your permission?
Woohoo!
...but I do not see anti-abortion views as "moral collapse." I might think it is misguided, by my lights, because it (usually) considers one thing and one thing only -- the life of an "unborn child."

When I used the term "moral collapse," I meant (Christ-like as I am well known to be :rolleyes:) forgetting to treat others as we would like to be treated.

I ask you, how many Republicans would like a law that made it harder for them to vote? Would they think it fair? And when they do it to others, do they chalk this up under "treat thy neighbor as thyself?" How many Republicans, do you suppose, would like to be villified because of their coloration, their height, their religious beliefs, their desire to have control over their own lives? And if they then support an anti-semite, who thinks....

Oh, drop it. Never mind. This kind of thing can go on endlessly.
I like that last sentence.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
I ask you, how many Republicans would like a law that made it harder for them to vote? Would they think it fair? And when they do it to others, do they chalk this up under "treat thy neighbor as thyself?" How many Republicans, do you suppose, would like to be villified because of their coloration, their height, their religious beliefs, their desire to have control over their own lives? And if they then support an anti-semite, who thinks....

I'm actually concerned that some Republicans, not all, would want that stuff.

Which means that instead of following the Golden Rule, it might be better to follow the Platinum Rule - that is, not to treat others as you want to be treated, but as they want to be treated - in such a case.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I'm actually concerned that some Republicans, not all, would want that stuff.

Which means that instead of following the Golden Rule, it might be better to follow the Platinum Rule - that is, not to treat others as you want to be treated, but as they want to be treated - in such a case.
The problem with what you call the "Platinum Rule" is that you can't actually know how others would like to be treated. Many don't know how to express that, and some are afraid to.

The only think you really know about is yourself (even, I'm afraid, when you don't entirely).
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
An amoralist doesn't look at things this way - there's no possible collapse if one does not make the assumption that some particular set of values is "moral" and some other set is "immoral."

Is that party against basically everything I value, and has that gotten worse not better over time?

Yes.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
I've lived long enough to see many Presidents from Eisenhower to Biden. To me Trump is a symptom. We had Nixon (Watergate), Ford (OK), Bush Sr. (ok from a standard politician) etc.

We've had gaslighting for a long time from "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth", Obama birth certificate, to absolute refusal to work with democrats (compromise), COVID lunacy, tolerating hate groups (refusing to utterly condemn) and so forth.

So to me Trump is a symptom (instantiation) of a long term decay process. There are a diminishing few, Liz Cheney and others, who I disagree with almost totally from a policy statement but who have honor.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I am going to say No. If you asked if they have had a complete moral collapse I would have said yes, but they appear to be on a slow road to recovery.

Not that they are likely to ever be completely moral, but that is a bit too much to ask for of any party.
 
Top