• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Different ways of being human?

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Discuss.

Methinks religions are different ways of being tribal. Being human is independent of religion.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Meerkats don't have religion

They are not tribal in the same ways as humans

Correct they don't have a religion in the same way early humans didn't have what you would call a religion.

A tribe is a tribe
 

Eddi

Agnostic
Premium Member
Correct they don't have a religion in the same way early humans didn't have what you would call a religion.

A tribe is a tribe
Early humans were in a state of nature.

For the most part, contemporary humans are entirely different and are not in a state of nature.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
That's more or less true, if a simplification. For most of human history, there wasn't even a word for "religion" and it was simply who you are, who your people are, and what you did. That is, different ways of being human, in a way.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
We aren't hunter-gatherers

We have long since mastered such things as agriculture and bronze working

And live in settlements

Etc....

And adopted religion. These things dont define humanity.
 

Eddi

Agnostic
Premium Member
And adopted religion. These things dont define humanity.
They define humanity as it is currently, not including isolated hunter-gatherer tribes

Such human societies are structured according to religious identities, which includes Atheism

Different religions are different ways of being human - in societies that have advanced beyond a state of nature

Religions and religious identities are a part of what it means to be a modern human

Including Atheism
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
They define humanity as it is currently, not including isolated hunter-gatherer tribes

Such human societies are structured according to religious identities, which includes Atheism

Different religions are different ways of being human - in societies that have advanced beyond a state of nature

Religions and religious identities are a part of what it means to be a modern human

Including Atheism

So early modern humans were not humans. And ibe been studying them for years.

Human had not changed its definition. Early modern humans (25/30 thousand years ago were still human)

Bull. They are structured via country/continent.

Religion is a method of keeping tribes together.

Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby
 

Eddi

Agnostic
Premium Member
So early modern humans were not humans.
They are not modern humans just as wolves are not dogs, modern humans are domesticated hunter-gatherers

What goes for one does not go for the other

Religion is a method of keeping tribes together.
Atheism has been used to do that

Look at Stalinist USSR or China

Atheism has been used to hold together totalitarian societies

And I would argue that Atheism is tribal, that it constitutes a tribe

It functions just like any religion
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
They are not modern humans just as wolves are not dogs, modern humans are domesticated hunter-gatherers

I'll let you tell the science of anthropology thst it's wrong and needs to start again.

FYI early modern humans (cro magnon) were as human as you and me.


Atheism has been used to do that

Look at Stalinist USSR or China

I see you have not studded the ussr much have you?

Or the reasons for the pogroms against religion (and to a certain extent, atheiem) in totalitarian countries


Atheism has been used to hold together totalitarian societies

Has it? Then why were atheists also imprisoned?

And I would argue that Atheism is tribal, that it constitutes a tribe

The only thing atheists have in common is disbelief in gods, nothing more, nothing less.

It functions just like any religion

No it doesn't.
 

Eddi

Agnostic
Premium Member
FYI early modern humans (cro magnon) were as human as you and me.
Biologically, of course, but not behaviourially

Then why were atheists also imprisoned?
For being free-thinkers!

The only thing atheists have in common is disbelief in gods, nothing more, nothing less.
Then there would be no such things as "atheists" it wouldn't exist as a category of humans, clearly it is, if you can speak of "atheists", if you use that actual word and concept

The fact that there is a unifying factor makes it a tribe, that is defined by both in-group and out-group distinctions

Just as a belief in Jesus defines and unites Christians so too does a disbelief in in God define and unite atheists

Seems very much like a religion to me

No it doesn't
Then how come on RF some atheists fill in their "religion" as "atheist"?????
 
Last edited:

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
The only thing atheists have in common is disbelief in gods, nothing more, nothing less.

Eh, this is oversimplifying a tad. Atheism is always a reaction against the surrounding cultural environment, specifically the prevailing theologies. Because of how religion in the West became dominated by institutional religion, atheism in the West is also a reaction against institutionalized religion. Part of that reaction involves formulation of one's own creeds, ideas, and institutions... which at the end of the day is pretty analogous in form and function to those you find in theistic religions.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Eh, this is oversimplifying a tad. Atheism is always a reaction against the surrounding cultural environment, specifically the prevailing theologies. Because of how religion in the West became dominated by institutional religion, atheism in the West is also a reaction against institutionalized religion. Part of that reaction involves formulation of one's own creeds, ideas, and institutions... which at the end of the day is pretty analogous in form and function to those you find in theistic religions.
Always a reaction?
How would you know that?

I might as well pronounce you a
(Reactionary) afalling saucerist or
aastrologist for saying " Meh, I
don't belive such tosh."
 
Top