• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

WHY, somebody please tell me, WHY is Hunter Biden a matter for Congress?

Should Congress be investigating Hunter Biden?

  • Yes (please say why)

    Votes: 4 17.4%
  • No (please say why)

    Votes: 2 8.7%
  • If he's done something illegal, why not let the justice system deal with it, like everybody else?

    Votes: 17 73.9%

  • Total voters
    23

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I don't watch dog and pony shows especially when they are nothing more than political stunts....and this goes for both sides.
Impeachment of President Trump was known to result in failure in the Senate from the get go......hence dog and pony show/political stunt
Jan 6 hearings was dog and pony show. Only the DOJ and courts can charge and convict in this case.....hence dog and pony show/political stunt

As far as the OP question.
I want to know why this was covered up by 99% of the media until after the 2020 and 2022 elections.
How much of what has been uncovered by real journalist point to misconduct of then VP Biden.
However, again the only thing the committe can do is shine a light on the data on the laptop....
Biden can not be impeached for his activites prior to taking office as the President. Hence these hearing are dog and pony shows/policitcal stunt.
Hunter is under investigation by DOJ in Delaware, let see what becomes of that.
Well, that certainly was a lot of words to say "No, I did not watch the Jan 6 hearings and therefore, I am uninformed on them."
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
OK, whatever makes you day.
However, am entitled to my own opinion, and you yours; however unlike you I will not disparage your beliefs.
One is an informed opinion, while the other isn't.
If you're cool with being the latter, I'm really not sure what to say.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
It is nothing personal e, But an opinion on something you haven’t seen doesn’t have much value.

21 Beloved Movies, Reviewed By People Who Haven't Seen Them
I didn't have to watch the trial in the Senate to know it wasn't going anywhere and I didn't have to watch the dog and pony show about the Jan 6 hearing to know they were nothing more than political theater. I am quite aware of the unlawful actions of demonstrators on Jan 6th, but the House has no judical authority over citizens.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Do you have an opinion on a nuclear explosion? Have you ever seen one live?
Well I did see that nuclear explosion that occurred during the Jan 6th committee hearings.

Did you see that one?

No, I guess you didn't see that.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
That is not what he previously had said. Matter of fact, he repeatedly has referring to it as a "witch hunt" and has smeared Garland as a "leftist".
He said the January 6th Committee is/was. That particular Committee is a rogue aberration. That is different from saying all Committee investigations are.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
He said the January 6th Committee is/was.
Clearly, it is not.

That particular Committee is a rogue aberration.
For you to stoop to such a low, especially for one who is an educator, is appalling. The committee has the right to do this per the Constitution, and some Pubs do agree that it needed to be done.

The reality, which you are avoiding, is that there has been some Pub support, plus the vast majority of witnesses are Republicans who have direct links to Trump. To defend depravity is depravity in and of itself, especially since it's now clearly obvious what Trump in general has been doing and why he's been doing it.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
He said the January 6th Committee is/was. That particular Committee is a rogue aberration. That is different from saying all Committee investigations are.
Just the committee investigations into him.

Am I wrong? Has there been an investigation of Trump, or the Trump administration, or Trump businesses that Donald Trump has not called a witch hunt?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I didn't have to watch the trial in the Senate to know it wasn't going anywhere and I didn't have to watch the dog and pony show about the Jan 6 hearing to know they were nothing more than political theater. I am quite aware of the unlawful actions of demonstrators on Jan 6th, but the House has no judical authority over citizens.
Of course it was not going anywhere. Since you do not seem to follow politics much let me give you a quick recap. In the House where it was the House's duty all sorts of evidence against Trump was found, even though the Republicans either did not want to participate or openly opposed attempts to find evidence. The vote for impeachment was pretty much along party lines. Then it was the Senates job to try the case with evidence from both sides, except because the Republicans would not participate there did not appear to be any for Trump. Thinking for some odd reason that this was totally unfair, the Republican leadership did not allow the presentation of evidence.

Now let's say a friend of a judge is brought to a trial for a very serous charge and for some odd reason that judge does not allow the prosecutor to present any evidence. What would you call that court? By the way the answer is the same if only the prosecutor is allowed to present evidence too. I ill let you think about tit, but put the answer in a spoiler for you:

A kangaroo court.

A person that was likely to be guilty is let off in a kangaroo court when the prosecutor is not allowed to present evidence.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Just the committee investigations into him.

Am I wrong? Has there been an investigation of Trump, or the Trump administration, or Trump businesses that Donald Trump has not called a witch hunt?
Did you just admit that there have been several Congressional Committees that targeted President Trump?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
...there have been several Congressional Committees that targeted President Trump?
And for good reason that some Pubs agree with as well.

BTW, what do you think about Trump's meeting over lunch with two Holocaust deniers that are also notorious anti-Semitics? Now he's claiming he didn't know they were, but even some Pubs ain't buying that story.
 
Last edited:
Top