• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sex, not violence, could've sealed the fate of the Neanderthals

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Sex, not violence, could've sealed the fate of the Neanderthals (msn.com)

More evidence emerges that Neanderthals and Homo sapiens made love and not war thousands of years ago.

The species Homo sapiens (or "wise man") began to evolve about 300,000 years ago, and eventually won out the evolutionary battle and became the only Homo species to reign on Earth about 40,000 years ago. During the early days of human life, another species named Homo neanderthalensis, or more commonly called Neanderthals, co-existed with Homo sapiens. In 2010, a ground-breaking analysis of a Neanderthal genome revealed that the two species could successfully interbreed.

It was once thought that war and violence caused the demise of the Neanderthals. However, a new study out this week in the journal PalaeoAnthropology adds to a growing body of research that proposes that Homo sapiens may have been responsible for the extinction of Neanderthals in a different manner—sex.

The researchers compared the genomes of Neanderthals and present day humans, and discovered that breeding in between the two species could have led to the eventual extinction of Neanderthals. When looking closer at the genomes of a Neanderthal with five modern humans, researchers discovered that Asians and Europeans share roughly one to four percent of their DNA with Neanderthals, while Africans don’t share any. This suggests that modern humans bred with Neanderthals after they left the African continent, but before they spread East to Asia and north towards Europe roughly 250,000 years ago.

So, I guess in scientific terms, the Neanderthals were ****ed.

However, there currently isn't any evidence of Homo sapiens genetics in late Neanderthal genomes dating to between 40,000 to 60,000 years ago. Only 32 Neanderthal genomes have been sequenced, which makes it possible that a lack of Homo sapiens DNA within the Neanderthal genome is simply due to a low sampling.

It is also possible this is due to hybridization—where one species starts mating with another, creating offspring of a new variety. There are plenty of examples of hybrids in nature, such as the liger, which is the offspring of a male lion and a female tiger, or a mule, which is the offspring of a horse and donkey. For some species combinations, it makes a difference which parent is from which species, and often the offspring are infertile.

The lack of mitochondrial DNA (inherited from mother to child) from Neanderthals present in living humans might be evidence that only male Neanderthals and female Homo sapiens could successfully mate. If the researchers’ theory is correct, fewer Neanderthals may have been breeding with one another, opting for interspecies mating. This would decimate populations of the already existing small and scattered groups of Neanderthal families, eventually pushing them towards decline.

"We don't know if the apparent one-way gene flow is because it simply wasn't happening, that the breeding was taking place but was unsuccessful, or if the Neanderthal genomes we have are unrepresentative," said Chris Stringer, the Research Leader in Human Evolution at London's Natural History Museum and study author, in a statement. "As more Neanderthal genomes are sequenced, we should be able to see whether any nuclear DNA from Homo sapiens was passed on to Neanderthals and demonstrate whether or not this idea is accurate."

"Our knowledge of the interaction between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals has got more complex in the last few years, but it's still rare to see scientific discussion of how the interbreeding between the groups actually happened," added Stringer. "We propose that this behavior could have led to the Neanderthals' extinction if they were regularly breeding with Homo sapiens, which could have eroded their population until they disappeared."

Around 600,000 years ago, Homo sapiens and Neanderthals diverged from each other and evolved in very different parts of the world. Neanderthal fossils have been found in Asia and Europe, with some as far from Africa and southern Siberia. Meanwhile, Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, but scientists are uncertain whether our ancestors are the direct descendants of one specific group of ancient African hominins or came about as the result of mixing between different groups spread across the continent.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
See, even homo sapiens women 60,000 years ago had bad taste in the Neaderthals they had sex with. Not much has changed.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Sex, not violence, could've sealed the fate of the Neanderthals (msn.com)







So, I guess in scientific terms, the Neanderthals were ****ed.
"When looking closer at the genomes of a Neanderthal with five modern humans, researchers discovered that Asians and Europeans share roughly one to four percent of their DNA with Neanderthals, while Africans don’t share any. This suggests that modern humans bred with Neanderthals after they left the African continent,"
It suggests there were no Neanderthals in Africa.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
"When looking closer at the genomes of a Neanderthal with five modern humans, researchers discovered that Asians and Europeans share roughly one to four percent of their DNA with Neanderthals, while Africans don’t share any. This suggests that modern humans bred with Neanderthals after they left the African continent,"
It suggests there were no Neanderthals in Africa.

Yeah, in effect as per the modern view there was several waves out of Africa and even some movement back to the Northern parts of Africa.
Then add Denisovans and possible cases of Homo erectus or other variants and it becomes a mess.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
"When looking closer at the genomes of a Neanderthal with five modern humans, researchers discovered that Asians and Europeans share roughly one to four percent of their DNA with Neanderthals, while Africans don’t share any. This suggests that modern humans bred with Neanderthals after they left the African continent,"
It suggests there were no Neanderthals in Africa.

Yes, that is correct. AFAIK, there have been no Neanderthal sites in Africa. All are in Europe and Asia.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
I don't see how it is an either-or situation here. Knowing humans, they had sex with anything convenient and killed whatever they felt like.
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
Yes, that is correct. AFAIK, there have been no Neanderthal sites in Africa. All are in Europe and Asia.

You are correct. Personal DNA testing also bears that out … for now. There is almost no Neanderthal representation from Sub-Saharan Africa. DNA testing, as you probably know is only as accurate as what’s being reported by members of those testing companies: 23andMe, Ancestry DNA, Family Tree DNA, etc. I think most of the reporting is coming from Europe and Western Asia, less from the Americas and East Asia, with very little coming from Sub-Saharan Africa. My own genetic composition reports have changed several times in the eight years since I spit in the vial. As a Sicilian and probable Norman descendant my percentage of North Atlantic dropped and my Western Asian increased. I’m curious to see how numbers shift as more regions of the world join, test and report.
 
Top