questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Introduction to debate on the thread title:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Every society in history ... except the Mongols.Introduction to debate on the thread title:
Introduction to debate on the thread title:
Not shame because it is written:It is a shame that the video has religious and political overtones
Families are like fruit trees in an apple orchard. If one apple on one tree is rotten, it's the apple - one bad kid. If many apples are rotten but all on the same tree, it's the tree that's diseased - one bad family. When the whole orchard is producing rotten fruit, it's not the trees, i.e., the families, that are the source of the problem, and focusing attention on them will do nothing to solve those problems.
In this kind of context specifically, because the "point of no return" rhetoric is just an empty lie to scare people in to some kind of action (typically buying a book, giving money to a church or, supporting some webpage).Why are we always passing but never passed point of no return?
Families are like fruit trees in an apple orchard. If one apple on one tree is rotten, it's the apple - one bad kid. If many apples are rotten but all on the same tree, it's the tree that's diseased - one bad family. When the whole orchard is producing rotten fruit, it's not the trees, i.e., the families, that are the source of the problem, and focusing attention on them will do nothing to solve those problems.
Crime and poverty are higher in broken homes. Families that stay together have many advantages and are much less of a burden on the tax payer.
Progressive tend to dump on the nuclear family. We never talk about the negative statistics connected to the broken family, so we can set a contrast. Many people feel sorry and do not wish to seem mean. However, we need to address this to help see the source of many social problems. Which of the two costs the tax payers the most? Which has more crime? Which does better in school and in their future?
One of the biggest problems, the Blacks in America face, is connected to the break up of the nuclear black family. In the 1950's and 1960's the black family was strong since they had to stick together. They were under the microscope of racism. The strong family unit led to the Civil Rights Movement due to the high road example the Blacks of that era, set. Their protests were peaceful. It was not about looting like you see in Democrat run inner cities. It was about mature adults walking in peace and not angry children from broken homes having a temper tantrum.
After that social change, there was a decline in the nuclear family that was triggered by Progressivism. They assume all types of family units were as good as the nuclear family. The result was more and more poverty, crime and social need. Strong nuclear Black families still do much better in many metrics.
What advantage does the low road of broken homes bring to the Progressive movement? Is it the recipe for growing Big Government? Is all the disadvantages of broken homes a way to keep the blacks down, while pretending to be their defender by ? Abortion is also very high among inner city blacks. Mothers are overwhelmed since father wish to be players and not fathers.