-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Harriet Hageman defeats Liz Cheney in Wyoming primary
- Thread starter Shaul
- Start date
Apparently you don’t know the definition of the word fact.
Oh no not Godwin’s law again
,that’s nothing to worry about but Sarah Palin is being let loose again,good luck.
This is cause for needlessly invocation of Hitler?Oh no not Godwin’s law again
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Projection.
No the word fact does not mean projection.
Well if the shoe fits why not?,I think Hitler was better at history though.
Time for...
I think flippant comparisons to the uniquely evil person of Adolf Hitler are wrong.
I don't view those who propagated the lies of the Bush administration about Iraq and WMDs as "honest." That she's honest in one instance doesn't erase her record of being otherwise.
Who said she alone does? I criticize others who voted for that war and/or promoted it, including Biden and Hillary Clinton. The focus of this thread is Liz Cheney, though, not any of the others who did similarly concerning the Iraq War.
No, one terrible decision doesn't make someone irretrievably evil, but a terrible decision followed by a series of actions to promote and defend that decision puts a huge question mark on someone's moral integrity, empathy, and honesty.
People who have made decisions as terrible as Liz Cheney's don't simply get to say "oops!" and get away scot-free after contributing to half a million deaths. I view human life as far too valuable to allow that.
You don't believe it possible that Cheney believed
Bush's representations about Iraq & WMDs?
Hillary apparently believed them, & voted for that
war too. Moreover, you were quite harsh to those
of us who voted for Trump in order to keep that war
monger out of office. And now, you oppose Trump's
strongest foe, thereby empowering him for another
run at the presidency.
I think you've some priorities to sort out & clarify.
It is possible she did initially. Whether she still believed them later on when she was still endorsing the war is a different story.
Did she ever publicly acknowledge her mistake in voting for the war or apologize for it? Not that an apology would bring back the lost Iraqi lives, but it would still be better than nothing at all.
Politicians generally don't admit mistakes or apologize.
(So that's a useless ad hoc standard for criticism.)
Although your alternative to Cheney, ie, Hageman did
admit her error of opposing Trump. She now fervently
supports him. And she was the alternative to Cheney.
Do you really believe that Hageman is the lesser of those
2 evils?
Ok how about Silvio burlusconi of Italy or Marine le Pen of France or Victor Orban of Hungary,they’re similar too.
Time for...
Do we really want Godwin's Law and Rule 34 in the same thread? It would go bad very fast.
I'd prefer to avoid Hitler.
But if he is to make an appearance, then let it be dancing Hitler.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you were projecting your faults upon others. Again.