• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

To choose a dharmic religion

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic ☿
Premium Member
If you had to convert to a dharmic religion, which religion would you choose?
Sikhism, Hinduism, Jainism or Buddhism?
If I had to convert, my nature would be to rebel and reject them all. I'd still be Buddhist, but would probably be even more of a hermit about it.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
But isn't there a variety of Hindus and Buddhists? We could be considered a different variety of these.
You believe in God and a messenger. Buddhists will reject you out right for believing in God and soul. Hindus will reject you for being exclusive, one God, one message.
 
Last edited:

Truthseeker

Non-debating member when I can help myself
You believe in God and a messenger. Buddhists will reject you out right.Hindus will ask you for proof, of which you have none.
Yes, of course they do. I'm entitled to my own opinion, and they are entitled to theirs. Live and let live.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Allow me to correct your bits of misunderstanding point by point, friend Aup. :)
1. Ask Bahais if they consider Bahaollah to be the God. Krishna is God himself as per Hindu belief.
2. "With this said, I think Buddhism does speak of Ultimate Reality in apophatic terms, all of Reality being empty of inherent existence and arising through the Law of Cause and Effect.": That is not Bahai belief. They believe in existence of God and of soul.
Yes, of course they do. I'm entitled to my own opinion, and they are entitled to theirs. Live and let live.
So Buddhistws reject you and you reject Buddhists. "To me my belief, and to you yours". What is the commonality?
As for peace and brotherhopod, I do not know who really means it and who is faking it.
People kill others while talking of peace.
 

Truthseeker

Non-debating member when I can help myself
Yeah, everyone is entitled to his/he opinion, however outlandish they may be - till the time when Bahais get their world militia. After that disagreements will not be accepted. :D
Sling forth your slander or misunderstanding all you want. It doesn't affect me.
 

SalixIncendium

अग्निविलोवनन्दः
Staff member
Premium Member
Probably not. But isn't there a variety of Hindus and Buddhists? We could be considered a different variety of these.

You can call yourself a Hindu and/or Buddhist all day long. Most of "variety of Hindus and Buddhists" are unaffected by that. I certainly am. That said, don't expect too many to accept your claim to their religion as valid. I certainly don't.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Sure, but it should teach to do things and not to do things.
Yamas and niyamas, codified by Patanjali, are the restraints (don'ts) and observances (dos) of the Hindu religion. They're considered the first two steps of yoga, which is the process to merger or closeness with God, not to be confused with the western stretching exercises wrongly termed yoga today.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
You believe in God and a messenger. Buddhists will reject you out right for believing in God and soul. Hindus will reject you for being exclusive, one God, one message.
Hehe. Yup a mango could be considered a make of car.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Yamas and niyamas, codified by Patanjali, are the restraints (don'ts) and observances (dos) of the Hindu religion. They're considered the first two steps of yoga, ..
  1. Yama (The five abstentions): Ahimsa (Non-violence, non-harming other living beings), Satya (truthfulness, non-falsehood), Asteya (non-stealing), Brahmacharya (celibacy, fidelity to one's partner), and Aparigraha (non-avarice, non-possessiveness
  2. Niyama (The five "observances"): Śauca (purity, clearness of mind, speech and body), Santosha (contentment, acceptance of others and of one's circumstances), Tapas (persistent meditation, perseverance, austerity), Svādhyāya (study of self, self-reflection, study of Vedas), and Ishvara-Pranidhana (contemplation of God/Supreme Being/True Self).
 

Truthseeker

Non-debating member when I can help myself
You can call yourself a Hindu and/or Buddhist all day long. Most of "variety of Hindus and Buddhists" are unaffected by that. I certainly am. That said, don't expect too many to accept your claim to their religion as valid. I certainly don't.
Why should it affect you? I don't expect that at all.

As to being Hindu or Buddhist, I overstated what I was trying to say. What my position actually is, is that I accept Hindu and Buddhist as valid. They are stages of the religion of God in a particular part of the world.
 
Top