• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

World is rapidly becoming bad and mad. Is it good a thing?

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Is it a Good Thing that the World is becoming bad and mad?

First of all the World has always been a bad place to be for some people.

Second: the problem that seems to be bothering you @questfortruth belongs in the political spectrum. I think.

Third, the world can never be mad. People are them that get mad. Do I see many, many, many, many, more mad people around? Yes, I call them "zombies". Sometimes, it seems to me that they might eat my brain if I were ever to offer it up for them to eat it. I won't because it is too gross, in my opinion.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Who is? What elite? Why do you think abortions wouldn't happen without "them", what is wrong with women deciding what happens with their own bodies? What's wrong with Satanism, you can't insist your beliefs are respected and others are not. What wrong with LGBT? No matter who is "in charge" people would still be born gay, and they harm no one.
Atheists is the elite because they have divine powers. There are two gods: satan and Real God. The atheists have fully accepted one of the two gods. Hence, they are absolute elite.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
It's a little bit odd, I think, introducing an amendment that can have zero effect. If, as Senator Dubious Rubio asserts, only biological females can get pregnant, then pregnancy services cannot possibly avail anyone else. Therefore, such an amendment wouldn't save a nickel. As such, it can only be deemed trivial and meant to be a nuisance.[/S]
 
Last edited:

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Who is? What elite? Why do you think abortions wouldn't happen without "them", what is wrong with women deciding what happens with their own bodies? What's wrong with Satanism, you can't insist your beliefs are respected and others are not. What wrong with LGBT? No matter who is "in charge" people would still be born gay, and they harm no one.
I say, too much coffee for you.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
To change gender and sexual orientation is OK, but to tell that you mean something is deluded?

That's a false dichotomy fallacy if ever there was one. Why is it wrong for someone suffering from gender dysphoria to live their lives in a way that makes that happy and fulfilled?

We each subjectively give our lives meaning, the people we love and who love us, and the things we enjoy, our hopes and plans and the pursuit of happiness, but I see no objective evidence there is any overarching meaning to life, either humans or any other animals. That we must find ourselves.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
That's a false dichotomy fallacy if ever there was one. Why is it wrong for someone suffering from gender dysphoria to live their lives in a way that makes that happy and fulfilled?

We each subjectively give our lives meaning, the people we love and who love us, and the things we enjoy, our hopes and plans and the pursuit of happiness, but I see no objective evidence there is any overarching meaning to life, either humans or any other animals. That we must find ourselves.

It is for the reduction of population. Genocide.

That's a spectacularly stupid claim, I don't think you know what genocide means, or what gender dysphoria is. People have a right to choose how they live their lives, why should you get to dictate that to them.

You also didn't address your false dichotomy fallacy. You failed to answer why it is wrong for someone suffering from gender dysphoria to live their lives in a way that makes that happy and fulfilled? You also failed to address the fact that there is no objective evidence there is any overarching meaning to life, either human life, or any other animals.

Give debate a try for once.
 
Last edited:

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
What do atheists have to do with the unborn?

Earth does not want them. True or false? (I have to say true most of the time). But, does God wants them? I tend toward the sanctity of life so yes, they are God's babies. God will have them (even if it means that some of the people will starve due to a lack of enough food for everybody.)

Atheist represent a small percentage of the population.

You can only say gods whatever if you can show a god exists otherwise it's just and empty comment.
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Atheist represent a small percentage of the population.

You can only say gods whatever if you can show a god exists otherwise it's just and empty comment.
Is thaT NEW NEWS OR OLD NEWS, IN UPUR OPINION?

So so you know, I don't care. If you can give me a confounding reason, then, I might. I just don't. OK?
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Is thaT NEW NEWS OR OLD NEWS, IN UPUR OPINION?

So so you know, I don't care. If you can give me a confounding reason, then, I might. I just don't. OK?

It's fact in my opinion.

I realise this. It happens a lot, its when they do care that the fun starts
 
Top