• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Fascism Test

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
What do you mean by that? Could you elaborate? :)
I speculate....
The game's creators believe that valuing a person based
upon contribution is a fascist trait. I agree with valuing
people that way, but I oppose government's valuing
people that way.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
What question(s) do you think might have affected your score?


Don't know really. I'm quite socialist, but would deny that socialism and fascism have much at all in common. Besides, I didn't answer yes to any of the state interventionist questions.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I speculate....
The game's creators believe that valuing a person based
upon contribution is a fascist trait. I agree with valuing
people that way, but I oppose government's valuing
people that way.
I fully disagreed with all the statements regarding imperialism, racism, warfare.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
I speculate....
The game's creators believe that valuing a person based
upon contribution is a fascist trait. I agree with valuing
people that way, but I oppose government's valuing
people that way.
I very much doubt that. I think it's just total whackass because even answering those as strongly disagree it still said I'm 40% fascist.
My conclusion is it doesn't like minds capable of thinking a question out and pondering the meaning of it. As with the question I posted, I can't really agree or disagree with it because I agree with one part of the question but disagree with the other part. Yes, the state is ultimately the only entity capable of granting or revoking a right. A just state would allow Bender to tell it to bite his shiny, metal arse over his rights being violated and accept it as what a healthy society looks like.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
32%. but not fascist.

"fascism is really a mix of communism, socialism, conservatism, and liberalism" , or as you say, total bollocks.
The Great Council of Fascism was made up by nationalists, socialists, liberals, republicans, monarchists, who all pretended to agree on everything. They all had their differences but for the Duce's sake they always found a compromise.
Source: Italy's history.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
I very much doubt that. I think it's just total whackass because even answering those as strongly disagree it still said I'm 40% fascist.
My conclusion is it doesn't like minds capable of thinking a question out and pondering the meaning of it. As with the question I posted, I can't really agree or disagree with it because I agree with one part of the question but disagree with the other part. Yes, the state is ultimately the only entity capable of granting or revoking a right. A just state would allow Bender to tell it to bite his shiny, metal arse over his rights being violated and accept it as what a healthy society looks like.
I disagreed that a State grants rights. In the US, the constitution is clearly worded: the State guarantees rights that you already, inherently, hold. I'm aware that many people word it (and believe) differently, but by doing so they are part of the fascist problem.

Perhaps the makers of the quiz believed along those lines.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I don't like some of these questions.
The individual cannot really claim any rights against the state, since it is the state that grants him these rights in the first place.
Well, yes I do firmly believe it is the state who grants rights as it is also the state who can take them away, reinstate lost rights, or create all new rights.
But a just state is one where these rights are firmly held and the individual can claim these rights.
I think otherwise, but that is because I think of the "state" as basically "us." That is, we collectively decide what we will tolerate -- and as we tolerate what we used to think intolerable, it becomes easier to tolerate more.

That, I think, is why the overturning of Roe v. Wade was so disconcerting after 50 years.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
That test clearly proves that Fascism is socialism by 50%...because I fully agreed with all the statements that are for state intervention in the economy. What about you? Did you? ;)


Ah and I fully disagreed with uncontrolled capitalism...etc...laissez-faire...that stuff
Did you also agree that between individual and the state, the state is more important?
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I very much doubt that. I think it's just total whackass because even answering those as strongly disagree it still said I'm 40% fascist.
My conclusion is it doesn't like minds capable of thinking a question out and pondering the meaning of it. As with the question I posted, I can't really agree or disagree with it because I agree with one part of the question but disagree with the other part. Yes, the state is ultimately the only entity capable of granting or revoking a right. A just state would allow Bender to tell it to bite his shiny, metal arse over his rights being violated and accept it as what a healthy society looks like.

I am convinced that Americans tend to have a misconception about what Fascism is.
Especially the economic part of Fascism.
Your test results are 40% fascist because you have surely agreed on the economics part, that is made up of socialism, welfare state, state interventism.
Fascism is light years away from Republicans' vision of economy.
It is socialist-like.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Did you also agree that between individual and the state, the state is more important?
Yes, I fully agreed with that.
The common good is superior to the individuals' wishes.
This is basic principles of administrative law, by the way.
 
Last edited:
Top