• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#48
lxxxxxx said:
The author of gMark may have put a couple of Paul's teachings into Jesus' mouth.

paarsurrey said:
for instance, please. Kindly elaborate one's points, please.

What I get to know is that while Hellenist Paul faked a vision and thus he became a fake Apostle; his Epistles appeared before the four Gospels - anonymous narrations, most certainly as I understand, please. Right?
By then Hellenist-Paul's associates and Hellenist-Pauline Church got well established and when the four Gospels-narrations appeared they doctored them as per the Hellenist Pauline creeds, it transpires to one. Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#125 (Thread: Are There Any Religious Ascetics On These Forums? )
Paarsurrey wrote :
" Galatians 6:17 "
It is not from Jesus, therefore, it is not a reliable source of guidance for those who follow Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah, in the ethical, moral and or spiritual matters, I understand. Right?

Paarsurrey added:

Moses never gave any such teaching to become ascetics as a messenger/prophet of G-d and he didn't receive any direct Converse in this regard, one gets to know, please. Right?
And (Jesus) Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah was mandated to follow Moses, please, he also didn't receive any such direct Converse from G-d, I understand, please. Right?
If yes, then kindly quote from the direct Converse of God that took place between (Jesus) Yeshua and G-d, please. Right?
Else, Yeshua is not to be accused of giving teachings to live as ascetics, please. Right?

Regards
 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#12
But Jesus didn't die a cursed death on the Cross, I understand, so there is no question of his resurrection from the dead, please. Right?
Please don't feel free to sin, Jesus had not authority to atone one's sins, it transpires, please. Right?
Isn't it an accusation on (Jesus) Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah that he preached dying and rising deity of Hellenism for atonement of sins of the Christians, please? Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?
#4 on "Christ/AntiChrist."

The persecutors of Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah, and his enemies (could be named anti-Christ) when they got confirmed:
  1. that Yeshua had not died on the Cross
  2. and has been delivered in a near-dead position
  3. and after treatment of his injuries inflicted on him on the Cross
  4. in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea
  5. had secretly gone to Galilee
  6. and from there he had migrated from Judea
  7. out the hands of both the Jews and the Romans
they thought of a new plan of revenge to lead astray the despaired followers of Yeshua who were left behind in Judea, one gets to know, please. Right?
This is how the birth of the AntiChrist took place, it transpires from the events that took place afterwards, please. Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#269 on " If Jesus Died..."

BrightShadow said↑
Actually those who believe in the divinity of Jesus:
  1. belong in the "house of Constantine". IMO.
  2. They deviated from the actual teachings of Jesus! IMO
  3. Wishful thinking! There is no such thing as an alternate fact!
  4. Bible clearly indicates Jesus wasn't a God. Jesus denied being God himself.
  5. No need to out-smart Jesus and try and turn him into a God.
  6. A real God would not go up the mountain and pray to himself! [Luke 5:16] & [Matthew 14:23]
Ha, ha! So, he came down - did the usual things just like any prophet would do (preach) then when the rumor started and he was charged with blasphemy - suddenly out of convenience - he decided to announce that he is dying to erase sins!
That is something Constantine wanted people to believe. IMO.
Simple questions can be asked - why Jesus' disciples were sad during the last supper? Why Jesus' companion reached for his sword, drew it out and struck the high priest's guard's ear and slash it off?
If Jesus prepared them and told them the reason why he is allowing himself to die - then why would anyone fight back? Why cut the ear off of the guard?
Even with the innovations - no where in the Bible Jesus claims to be God and asked anyone to worship him! In the contrary - I can show you many verse where he denied being God or implied not being God at all. [John 7:16], [John 12:49], [John 6:38], [John 5:30], [John 17:1-3], [Mark 10:17-18], [Matthew 7:21], [John 20:17], [John 8:42], [John 12:49], [Luke 9:20-21], [Luke 4:11], [John 14:24], [John 14:28], [Luke 22:42], [Luke 22:42], [Luke 5:16], [Matthew 14:23], and many more!
Paarsurrey wrote :

Friend @BrightShadow !

A wonderful and reasonable post consisting of good points ,I have numbered some of them for the convenience of my friends here, please. I rated one's above post very happily as "winner". Congratulation for writing such a good post, please!

Isn't making (Jesus) Yeshua G-d a heinous accusation on Yeshua by the Hellenist-Paulines, please? Right?
Yeshua would hate it being called God, one gets to understand, please. Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?
#13 Thread on " Christ/AntiChrist. "
paarsurrey wrote:
The persecutors of Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah, and his enemies (could be named anti-Christ) when they got confirmed:
  1. that Yeshua had not died on the Cross
  2. and has been delivered in a near-dead position
  3. and after treatment of his injuries inflicted on him on the Cross
  4. in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea
  5. had secretly gone to Galilee
  6. and from there he had migrated from Judea
  7. out the hands of both the Jews and the Romans
they thought of a new plan of revenge to lead astray the despaired followers of Yeshua who were left behind in Judea, one gets to know, please. Right?
This is how the birth of the AntiChrist took place, it transpires from the events that took place afterwards, please. Right?
Paarsurrey added:
(Jesus) Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah forewarned of rising such a person and his associates as is evident, one gets to know, please:

" The Pharisees are the primary opponent of the righteous through the Gospel of Matthew, and this could be another attack on them. However, Matthew 7:22 seems to make clear that the false prophets are Christian, rather than Jewish. This also could rule out other Jewish sects active in this period such as the Essenes and Zealots. While in later years Christian groups such as the Gnostics would become prominent rivals to mainstream Christianity, Gnosticism was not yet a major concern at the time this Gospel was written.[5] Scholars who see a rivalry between the Jewish Christianity of Mathew and the wider gospel of St. Paul have read this verse as an attack on Pauline Christianity.[6][7]
Matthew 7:15 - Wikipedia:
Isn't it clear that it must be Paul, I understand, please? Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?
#944 Thread on "The Resurrection is it provable?"

SZ said:
No, @paarsurrey openly declares that there was no crucifixion. I guess that is a handy way of getting around the resurrection problem. Most Muslims do not believe that Jesus died from crucifixion. Most say that it never happened. I am not sure if he is Muslim. He may be Bahai' or some other offshoot of Islam. But he does seem to share that belief on Jesus:
Islamic views on Jesus' death - Wikipedia.
OOO
" @paarsurrey openly declares that there was no crucifixion."

Paarsurrey wrote:
My friend @SZ !
I never claimed/said that, please. And there are:

65 Reasons to Believe Jesus Did Not Die on the Cross (the first one is given hereunder)
1. Why crucifixion?

Jews wanted him to be killed through crucifixion, so they can prove that Jesus is not a beloved of God, rather the curse of God is on him. Jews could have killed him easily as they were in hundreds of thousands in number and very strong. If killing should have been their desire, they could have done it easily. Just like they paid thirty pieces of silver to one of his disciples, if they would have paid him more, he might have done this service too. But they wanted him to be crucified so they can prove that he is not from God, rather he is an imposter and a fabricator. If he was from God, then God will definitely save him. May be that was the reason that Jesus was so reluctant to suffer on the cross.

Suggested readings and viewing

25% of Christians do not believe in resurrection and Queen’s former chaplain calls them non-Christians

BBC Documentary: Did Jesus Die On the Cross?

The Most Popular Video in the Muslim Times: Govt of India Documentary on Jesus in Kashmir!

The Best Collection to Introduce Islam to the Fellow Christians

Suggested Reading for the best understanding of personal religion in the 21st century
65 Reasons to Believe Jesus Did Not Die on the Cross
Right?
Strictly speaking there was no "resurrection" of Jesus, rather it was an " accusation" on Jesus by Paul to prove that (Jesus) Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah did not fulfill "Sign of Jonah" and ,therefore, was a false prophet in terms of Deuteronomy (13:5), one gets to know, please. Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?
#4 Thread on " Torath Mosheh Jews and Paul and the Law "

David Davidovich
said:
This a speculative question for only Torath Mosheh Jews/Orthodox Jews since it concerns the Christian Apostle Paul. Therefore, there isn't a wrong or right answer to this question. Also, this Christian apostle, at one time was a very pious Torah-following Jew known as Saul of Tarsus. Therefore, I would like to ask: What is your take on Paul's view of the Torah Law of Moses? Also, below is a quote from an article, which will give you an idea of what his viewpoint was of the Law:
click here: What Did Apostle Paul Teach about God's Law? (biblestudy.org)

" this Christian apostle (Paul), at one time was a very pious Torah-following Jew known as Saul of Tarsus. "
Paarsurrey wrote:

Isn't it a wrong premises/assumption/hypothesis as per the Jewish Encylopedia, please?:
SAUL OF TARSUS - JewishEncyclopedia.com
Right?

Regards
____________
#7 David Davidovich
"as well as by his ethical monitions, which are rather inconsistently taken over from Jewish codes of law for proselytes, the Didache and Didascalia. It is quite natural, then, that not only the Jews (Acts xxi. 21), but also the Judæo-Christians, regarded Paul as an "apostate from the Law"** (see Eusebius, l.c. iii. 27; Irenæus, "Adversus Hæreses," i. 26, 2; Origen, "Contra Celsum," v. 65; Clement of Rome, "Recognitiones," i. 70. 73)."
#7 David Davidovich
* Pauline Christianity - Wikipedia
Did Jesus Move to India After His Crucifixion?
 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#13 Thread on " The Problems of Hellenized Judaism and interpretation of Christian Scripture "

Paarsurrey wrote:
My understanding is that Pauline-Christianity's-Priesthood discourages its people to study OT first and then NT, they read it upside down, first they read NT and then OT; is it correct, please? Right?

EF said↑
Just Catholicism.
I have received a standard, strict Catholic upbringing and do not recall anyone teaching me what the Old Testament was about, and nobody encouraged me to read it.
The Catechism exclusively revolves around the Gospels, and the parables.
These were the only books.
Click to expand...
Paarsurrey wrote:

They (the Pauline-Christianity's priesthood) only cling to OT, as it has some prophecies, which they fit on Jesus to add some more credulity to the stuff they have collected that they call Gospels or NT, else, isn't the whole OT just a dead horse to them (the Pauline-Christianity), one gets to understand, please? Right?
Jesus read and mastered the Torah, he could never have adopted such an approach for his people, one could say, right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#59 Thread on " Jesus' Return "

Paarsurrey said:

None of the Pauline-Christianity people of the 45000+ denominations including the JWs and the Latter Day Saints could quote from Jesus that he would come back as a conquering King, as Jesus never claimed it, one, therefore, gets to know from it, please. Right?

Jesus' "Second Coming", since he died naturally (neither died on the Cross nor resurrected from the dead, I understand) is not to be in the physical and material form as those who die never return to this world in physical and material form, please. Right?

Instead of that somebody born of a father and mother was to come in Jesus' character and spiritual status to clear Jesus from all the accusations that have been made against Jesus by the Hellenist-Paul, his associates and the Pauline-Church with reasonable arguments, it transpires, please. Right?

And Jesus' himself explained it, didn't he please. Right?
Paarsurrey added further:

" And Jesus' himself explained it, as to what is meant by Second Coming of a person, didn't he please. Right?"

John the Baptist was asked by a delegation of priests (present tense) "Art thou Elias", he replied "I am not":

John 1:21 "Then who are you?" they inquired. "Are you Elijah?" He said, "I am not." "Are you the Prophet?" He answered, "No."

Matthew 11:14 -15:
14And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come. 15He who has ears, let him hear.…
Matthew 11:14 And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come.

Didn't Jesus declare that John-the-Baptist is in spirit/character/deeds is Elias/Elijah, please? Right?

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad 1835-1908 is therefore Second in Coming of Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah in spirit/character/deeds , it transpires, please. Right?

Jesus did not die on the Cross, isn't it therefore an accusation on Jesus (by the Pauline-Christianity)-that Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah is to come physically from the heaven and will rule as a worldly king, one must say, please? Right?

Regards
______________
Coming of The Messiah – The world is waiting for saviour
 
Last edited:

Venni_Vetti_Vecci

The Sun Does Not Rise In Hell
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the (whole) Bible?
While Jesus left nothing in writing, nor Jesus dictate anything to anybody. Isn't it a great sinful activity, please?
Right?

Regards

This entire thread is click-bait and the worse straw man I've ever witnessed.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#8 Thread on " Evidence That Jesus Was Plagiarized From Earlier Gods "
O.R.said: (with compliments from Paarsurrey)
View attachment 65241
Jesus Christ Byzantine Portrait c. 7th-11th A.D
Jesus is a mythological character derived from many different gods way before he came to be. let's take a look at a couple of deities that look very similar to him and have done miracles very similar to his as well. Yes, there are many more deities like him but I will only touch base on a couple that I believe resemble the Christ figure the most. And for the sake of keeping this article as short as I possibly can.
DYING AND RISING DEITIES
View attachment 65242
~ Serapis Christus AKA Serapis Christ Portrait c. 100-200 A.D
Created around 300 BC by Ptolemy 1, It is no coincidence that this man deity shares a remarkable resemblance with his complexion to that of Jesus Christ. His last name "Christus" which some people credit him with is also another word for "Christ" hence you can say "Serapis Christ." (masc. Christus = Christ.* Is this still coincidental to you? I don't think so. Ptolemy 1 created him to be the bull of sacrifice, "Apis" and the dying and rising god, "Osiris" to unify the greeks and egyptians in his region.
A quick summary of Apis and Osiris: Apis was a very prominent deity used for bull sacrifice and worship by the egyptians. (Osiris on the other hand is a dying and rising god. Osiris was a dying and rising deity who, in the Osiris Myth, was killed by his brother Set and chopped up into 14 pieces but Osiris' wife Isis was able to resurrect him so that she could have sex with him. She then bore the child named Horus. Immediately after this Osiris went to the underworld and rules it to this day 1.)
So thus the name Serapis was derived. Serpais would then attain these attributes of dying and rising and being the bull of sacrifice (2). Jesus was the sacrificial lamb and was a dying and rising deity as well.
View attachment 65244
~ Dionysus, God Of Wine Pottery c. 400 B.C
He came to be around the 13th century BC. In this work of art, I again can't help but look at him and think of the Jesus figure. He's yet another dying and rising deity. He is also known as the "twice-born" God where the first incarnation of himself was "Zagreus - first born dionysus." After his resurrection he became "Dionysus - the God of wine." There are some that claim he could turn water into wine like Jesus but this could not be corroborated. Even so, it is worth mentioning.
According to the information from the Dionysus | Encyclopedia Britannica n.d) "In Orphic legend (i.e., based on the stories of Orpheus), Dionysus—under the name Zagreus—was the son of Zeus by his daughter Persephone. At the direction of Hera, the infant Zagreus/Dionysus was torn to pieces, cooked, and eaten by the evil Titans. But his heart was saved by Athena, and he (now Dionysus) was resurrected by Zeus through Semele. Zeus struck the Titans with lightning, and they were consumed by fire" (3).
BONUS
Lastly, I want to debunk one REALLY important concept of Jesus. His virgin birth of course.
View attachment 65245
Rhea Silvia And Her Two Sons, Romulus and Remus Statue c. 1400-1499 A.D
Meet Rhea Silvia. She was a vestal virgin which in ancient Rome is a 30 year vow of chastity. According to the story, she was the daughter of king Numitor of Alba Longa who later on was deposed by his younger brother Amulius. Amulius then made her a vestigial virgin so she couldn't have any Claimants to the throne that Amulius now usurped. Some day afterwards something rather unusual unraveled.
She was met by the God of Mars when she went into his grove and he wanted to conceive her two children named Romulus and Remus. After the incident she then went around claiming she had just been raped by the God of Mars and is now pregnant. Then she gave birth to Romulus and Remus (4). And mentioned in Romulus and Remus | Encyclopedia Britannica) "Amulius, enraged over the ordeal, ordered the infants to be drowned in the Tiber River. The guards, having pity on them because of their innocence, decided to raft them down the Tiber River instead. They hit an end down the river and were suckled by a she-wolf and woodpecker which were sacred animals to Mars and were later found by the herdsman Faustulus" (5). It's very similar to the baby Moses story.† Check out the birth story of 'Sargon of Akkad' as well if you want to see what inspired the Exodus story relating to baby Moses.‡
I want to also note that the earliest known manuscript for This virgin birth story about Rhea Silvia dates to the 3rd century BC even though the story is about the birth of Rome which occured in 753 BC. We have no known documents as of now for the Romulus and Remus story dating at the time in which Rome was founded. Wikiped ia Contributors 2022, June 20 - Rhea Silvia. Wikipedia). From a historical standpoint, This is at least 200 years before the purported virgin birth belief of Jesus through Mary and about 300 years before the idea of a Christian virgin birth was penned on paper. Therefore, we can reasonably say that the Christian NT scribes borrowed the virgin birth story from Roman and perhaps even Greek mythology for the sake of their own belief about Jesus. It obviously did not start with Christianity as we can see though.
CONCLUSION
I find no real reason to believe in the Jesus story as the overwhelming amount of evidence points in the opposite direction of him being a real historical figure. And that these ideas of resurrection and a virgin birth were already incorporated into various religious beliefs centuries before Christianity was even a thought amongst the common folk.
~ Only Reason

Bibliography
1. World History Edu. (2022, April 19). Birth, Death & Resurrection of Osiris, the Ancient Egyptian God of the Underworld. Birth, Death & Resurrection of Osiris, the Ancient Egyptian God of the Underworld - World History Edu
2. Serapis Christ. (n.d.). Lost-History. The Dying-and-Rising Gods: Sereapis
3. Dionysus | Powers, God, Parents, Meaning, Symbols, & Facts. (n.d.). Encyclopedia Britannica. Dionysus | Powers, God, Parents, Meaning, Symbols, & Facts
4. Wikipedia contributors. (2022, June 20). Rhea Silvia. Wikipedia. Rhea Silvia - Wikipedia
5. Romulus and Remus | Story, Myth, Definition, Statue, & Facts. (n.d.). Encyclopedia Britannica. Romulus and Remus | Story, Myth, Definition, Statue, & Facts" Unquote

Paarsurrey says:

I agree with one on what I have colored in magenta above. The bibliography at the end is also very useful.
Jesus (not Yeshua son of Maryam or Mariam ) is most certainly a mythical figure created and imposed cunningly on Yeshua (in his absence) and his teachings by Hellenist Paul, his associates and later the Pauline Church, as I understand, please . Right?
Yeshua (son of Maryam or Mariam):
  1. who did not die on the Cross,
  2. and who was treated for his injuries in the room type tomb of Joseph Arimathea
  3. and when fit to travel, he secretly went to Galilee
  4. and who migrated from Judea to the eastwards countries
  5. to convey his message to the Israelite diaspora
is a historic figure, one could Google for it, and one would find a lot of historic clues to that end, one gets to know, please. Right?

Regards
 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#1030 Thread on " Shroud of Turin is from first AD. "
Axxxxx said:
It's supposedly his burial shroud.

Paarsurrey says:
" burial shroud"

I don't agree with the above, please.
It is impossible to be a "burial" shroud as Yeshua's friends knew for sure that though Yeshua was seriously injured yet very much alive, so neither they gave Yeshua a burial bath nor they performed the burial service, one understands , please. Right?

If yes, then anybody kindly quote as to when Yeshua was given the burial/funeral bath and when his funeral service was performed and who lead it, please? Right?

Isn't (Jesus') Yeshua's death on the Cross sheerly faked by Hellenist Paul for his own ulterior motives, it transpires, please? Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#25 Thread on " Zeus and Adam."
JDB said:
In a sentence, this thread is about the relationship between Zeus and the first human in the Bible, Adam; and more specifically about Adam's, and Zeus', firstborn sons.
For those willing to read more than a sentence, we can say that until the original sin, Adam appears not to have been strictly mortal himself. It's only after the sin that God kills a mortal creature and gives its flesh to cover up Adam's nakedness after his, Adam's, spiritual covering is removed because of the sin. There's a sense in which the story of Zeus' firstborn son, and the story of Adam's firstborn son, are not just parallel, but where you can't fully understand the nature of Adam's firstborn son, until you're willing to do the hard work of exegeting pagan and Jewish mythology as though they're discussing the same thing.
John

paarsurrey said:
" original sin "

Did (Jesus) Yeshua talk about the "original sin ", please?
If yes, then kindly quote from him for the claim in this issue and the gist of reason given by him in this connection, please. Right?

JDB said:
What if I don't, and I don't, own a red-letter edition of the Gospels? Then, from what I gather, I can't convince you I'm quoting Jesus. Dylan said it's all in the song. You've implied its all in the red ink. I have no red ink edition and thus find myself in the outer regions and the limbo of the lost both of which result in fear and trembling and gnashing of teeth.:D
John
Paarsurrey writes.

The Post one is answering does not mention of the Red Letter Bibles, does it, please? Right?
Even a child would know what has been said by Yeshua while reading a Bible, they have simply made it convenient for everybody, haven't they, please? Right?
One has enough of common sense, hasn't one, please? Right?
One couldn't quote and one can never quote from (Jesus) Yeshua as he never believed in the " original sin" which is a creed imported from Hellenism by the Pauline-Christianity, one gathers, please. Right?
Am I therefore right to say, it is an accusation on Yeshua that he believed in the " Original Sin", please? Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#64 Thread on " Jesus' Return "

paarsurrey said:
" Jesus is coming back as a conquering King "

Kindly quote from Jesus in this connection, please. Right?
If one cannot, isn't it an accusation against Jesus, please? Right?
xxxxxx Wrote:

Rev 17:14 They will make war on the Lamb, and the Lamb will conquer them, for he is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those with him are called and chosen and faithful.”

paarsurrey said:


The verse ( Rev 17:14) reference by one is not from Jesus. Right?
One couldn't quote from Jesus, one may reflect therefore that one is deviated from the path of Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah, it transpires, please. Right?

Regards
_________________
Holy Bible King James Version (Red Letter Edition)
The Roman Catholic Holy Bible with the words of Jesus in red.
World Messianic Bible
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

#11 Thread on " Let's see about the Arch of Titus "

Cxxxxx Said:

The arch of Titus is a monument dedicated to the emperor Titus deification, and the victory of Rome over the Jewish rebellion. No bible needed.
Paarsurrey Says:

Does one mean that Apotheosis, divinization or deification, was common those days in Rome to glorify, a human being who had accomplished something usual, to exalt him to the position of a god. Right?
Does it reflect in any way on the Hellenist-Pauline Christology , please? Right?

Regards
___________
16030661272398488756

The Arch of Titus, showing the "Spoils of Jerusalem" relief on the inside arch
220px-The_Arch_of_Titus%2C_Upper_Via_Sacra%2C_Rome_%2831862188061%29.jpg

South inner panel, close-up of relief showing spoils from the fall of Jerusalem
220px-TitusNorthDetail.jpg

South inner panel, close-up of relief showing spoils from the fall of Jerusalem
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

Post #5 Thread on " Luke 16:19-31.Are more and more people starting to think this story isn't literal?"
Paarsurrey:

Sorry, to start with a verse, some verses preceding yet very much in the context, please, Right? :

15 And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.
Luke 16:15

By "God" in the above verse Yeshua means most certainly "God the Father" neither Yeshua himself nor the Holy Ghost/Spirit, one gets to know, please, Right?
Paarsurrey added:

Mustn't one interpret verses from Jesus, if these or literal/physical or metaphorical, supported by some other clear-cut, unambiguous, straightforward and unequivocal verses from Jesus, else, it will be a disrespect to Jesus, please?
Right?

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Isn't it a phenomenon as foretold by the Second Coming, please?:
Post #143 Thread on " Is the United States just not mature enough to deal with radical fringe madness? "

#32
“Yajuj [Gog] and Majuj [Magog] are two peoples who have been mentioned in earlier scriptures. The reason why they are so called is that they make extensive use of Ajij [fire], and would reign supreme on earth and dominate every height. At the same time, a great change will be ordained from heaven and will usher in days of peace and amity” (Lecure Sialkot, Ruhani Khazain, Volume 20, Page 211) written in 1904
https://www.alislam.org/urdu/rk/Ruhani-Khazain-Vol-20.pdf#page=237

And:

“I have also proved that it is essential for the Promised Messiah to appear at the time of Gog and Magog. Since Ajij, from which the words Gog and Magog are derived, means ‘fire’, God Almighty has disclosed to me that Gog and Magog are a people who are greater experts in the use of fire than any other people. Their very names indicate that their ships, trains and machines will be run by fire. They will fight their battles with fire. They will excel all other people in harnessing fire to their service. This is why they will be called Gog and Magog. These are the people of the West, as they are unique in their expertise in the use of fire. In Jewish scriptures too it was the people of Europe who were described as Gog and Magog. Even the name of Moscow, which is the ancient capital of Russia, is mentioned. Thus it was preordained that the Promised Messiah would appear in the time of Gog and Magog.”(Ayyam-us-Sulh, Ruhani Khazain, Volume 14, Pages 424-425) written in 1899
https://www.alislam.org/urdu/rk/Ruhani-Khazain-Vol-14.pdf
Right?
_____________
AhmadiAnswers | Dajjal And Gog And Magog
Paarsurrey :
So, both contending world super powers, Gog (Russia) and Magog (America) have melted like mountains of salt. Right?
" God Almighty has disclosed to me"
Not only G-d had direct Converse with the Second Coming as is evident from the above quotes from him, but G-d also showed truthful dreams/visions to his son the Second
Caliph/Successor of him:
" Twenty-four years ago I saw in a dream that I was standing in the middle of a vast plain and a monster in the form of a huge serpent was approaching in the distance. Its proportions might have been as much as twenty yards in length and a thickness of the trunk of a giant tree.
As the monster approached, it seemed that it had started from one end of the earth, devouring everything along the way.
When it reached the point where I was standing, it turned towards an Ahmadi, who started to run to escape the reptile. At that moment, I grabbed a big staff and started to chase the monster in order to rescue the Ahmadi.
But I found that the monster was running so
fast that I had no chance of overtaking it. All the same, I continued to run, and then I saw that the Ahmadi had reached a tree, which he started to climb in haste. But before he could climb high enough, the reptile reached him and swallowed the Ahmadi in a single mouthful.
Then the monster turned in anger at me for having tried to rescue its prey. But as it ran to attack me I saw the frame of a charpai (Indian bedstead) lying close to where I stood. As soon as the serpent came close, I jumped on to this frame and managed to stand astride on its two opposite bars. As the reptile came closer, I heard some people asking me how I could hope to fight it when the Holy Prophet (sa) had said that there was no one who could subdue it.
I realized then that this monster was none other than the Gog and Magog to whom this hadith referred and that the monster was in fact the dajjal. At that point, I raised both hands towards heaven in prayer for God’s help and protection. Responding to the Ahmadis by my side who had pointed out to me the futility trying to fight the monster, I said that I did not seek to fight it through my own powers, but through the power of prayer; and that victory by this means was not precluded by what the Holy Prophet (sa) had said.
As I prayed, I noticed a change was coming over the serpent, just like little mountain insects that start to melt when salt is poured over them. I noticed that it had started to lose its fire and speed, until it became completely dormant. It then assumed a jelly-like form, which melted into watery liquid that began to flow away.
I turned to my companions and said, ‘Did you observe the power of prayer? Of course, I did not have the strength to overcome the danger I faced, but my God certainly had the power to remove it’. "
Islam Ka Iqtisadi Nizam” or "The Economic System of Islam" 136-137, written in 1945 by Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad, the Second Khalifah Head of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community .
The Economic System of Islam
Right?

Regards
___________
#143
 
Top