questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Stop insulting my intellect. I am scientist.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Stop insulting my intellect. I am scientist.
Start behaving like one then.Stop insulting my intellect. I am scientist.
Or common sense, that nowhere ever will a chimp evolve into a human being by evolutionary processes.Most comments on species evolution by creationists are gibberish, as they have "learned" about their cartoon version of it through creationist propaganda.
So what you’ve just described here is demonic, fleshly, lying works of Satan which are all counterfeits according to Scripture which is described as The Word of God. In the Word of God I have found the One True God and Jesus Christ. I have found Him to be the authentic God and King.Science is also handicapped in the area of magic, sorcery, black magic, witchcraft, mutant powers, alien tech, healing crystal magic, ghosts and detecting angels.
Spiritual matters ARE discerned by spiritual people. Which is why we have 4200 religions and hundreds of Gods and each is the actual supreme true God, witchcraft, magic, remote viewers, mediums who talk to dead people, psychics who predict the future and not one of them can produce any evidence to verify their claims. Spiritual people have figured out if you buy into something and believe it, IT'S TRUE!! Also evidence doesn't matter and science can't test the supernatural. Also science cannot test things that are not real. I guess that's just a weird coincidence?
Sheldon said: ↑
It's not banned, and that's not what proselytising means.
I REPEAT: Stop forbidding to use Bible verses. Bible is alive as anybody is and has right to say own opinion.
For the word of God is alive Hebrews 4:12
It's not banned, this site even has a reference tool for quoting it as part of debate, but not for proselytising.It is all-time low to ban Holy Bible.
Some on here are saying they are an ape, an ape mates with an ape.Proving unequivocally he doesn't understand what a species it, or that apes (uncluding humans) are a taxonomical group and not a single species, and that all living things have shared ancestry.
So what you’ve just described here is demonic, fleshly, lying works of Satan which are all counterfeits according to Scripture which is described as The Word of God. In the Word of God I have found the One True God and Jesus Christ. I have found Him to be the authentic God and King.
@ElishaElijah
Some on here are saying they are an ape, an ape mates with an ape.
Evolution is nothing more than confirmation bias.
Scientist have the same fossils and bones yet come up with different views on the same evidence.
If you read what I wrote you will notice that according to the Bible what he described is demonic activity not the activity from God the Creator.Nope, this is just an obvious no true Scotsman fallacy, where any facts you don't like are labelled as demonic and dismissed with irrational handwaving. Also this rationale can be extremely dangerous as history has shown.
You are banning me from expressing the opinion of the God of the Bible. God wrote the Bible, Bible is not banned. So, I have right to quote the Bible. Even if the question is: "Is LGBTQ membership sin or not?"It's not banned, this site even has a reference tool for quoting it as part of debate, but not for proselytising.
You used an blatantly obvious circular reasoning fallacy, and I don't believe for a minute you are a scientist, your posts show a shocking ignorance of it's methods, that even a laymen like myself can see are embarrassingly wrong. I also never motioned your intellect in that post, at all, so well done.Stop insulting my intellect. I am scientist.
Science cannot test things that are unseen and spiritual. That doesn’t mean they are not real. Spiritually dead people cannot discern spiritual things and that’s what the Bible says about that and my view as well.Also science cannot test things that are not real. I guess that's just a weird coincidence?
Or common sense, that nowhere ever will a chimp evolve into a human being by evolutionary processes.
Genesis explains how we got here and again the way Genesis is explained lines up with the reality of life that we experience presently.
The confirmation bias is evolutionists have a theory so the fossil evidence is seen through that view and so your consensus is just those particular scientists who see evolution as far as Darwin’s theory picture of an ape slowly evolving into a human. Now that has all changed since that’s never been shown to happen and excuses made and terms blurred. Why? Because the obvious unanswerable question is what is the root of the tree, the beginning of life, your ancestor?I thought it was based on confirmation bias, it can't be both can it?
Really? Then you never read it, simple enough that even a child can understand it.No it doesn't, at all, Genesis explains nothing,
If you read what I wrote you will notice that according to the Bible what he described is demonic activity not the activity from God the Creator. What were the facts?
You are banning me from expressing the opinion of the God of the Bible. God wrote the Bible, Bible is not banned. So, I have right to quote the Bible. Even if the question is: "Is LGBTQ membership sin or not?"
joelr said: ↑
Also science cannot test things that are not real. I guess that's just a weird coincidence?
Science cannot test things that are unseen and spiritual.
That doesn’t mean they are not real.
Spiritually dead people cannot discern spiritual things
that’s what the Bible says about that and my view as well.