Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
This question about why UK has never lost a war was posed and challenged on Quora:
Why has the UK never lost a war?
https://www.quora.com/Why-has-the-UK-never-lost-a-war
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Queen Elizabeth II and the Davidic Line
- Thread starter Elihoenai
- Start date
This question about why UK has never lost a war was posed and challenged on Quora:
Why has the UK never lost a war?
https://www.quora.com/Why-has-the-UK-never-lost-a-war
Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
I provided info about British Israelism from wikipedia.
Yes, British Israelism is a White Supremacist Movement. In the same way Black Hebrew Israelites is a Black Supremacist Movement and Ethnic Jewish Movements are Jewish Supremacist Movements. What they all have in common is having Genetics are the determining factor of being Elohim's/God's Superior Chosen people.
Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
Apparently, the English Crest was adopted in 1837. If Knights Templar/Freemason geniuses had in mind to produce Family Tree forgery, it wouldn't be difficult for them to do so.
The English Flag is a Knights Templar/Freemason Flag. Knights Templar/Freemason are Roman Catholic Soldiers. That means England has been under the control of the Universal Roman Catholic Church for centuries.
Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
No, that's Hard Power. With the establishment of the Commonwealth of Nations Britain became increasingly more sophisticated with Soft Power.
Most white supremacists have the sense not to admit it.
Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
Ephesians 4:6
6 One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
If it was not the Will of Elohim/God it would not have happened.
Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
It's belief through Faith rather than conclusive factual evidence.
Given that the British Royal House is of the Davidic Line, the Prophesies concerning Israel are British Prophesies.
Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
Is it possible to be not devoted and a Christian? Does having one Paedophile in the Royal Family make them all Paedophiles? Are you saying that Pedophilia is widespread among the family?
Wrong, she has given 70 years of extremely well paid (including top notch accommodation) service while people children are starving.
I hope you enjoyed spending taxpayers money.
You can be extremely well paid and still give tireless and selfless service to your country. Do you agree with this?
Truth in love
Well-Known Member
Apparently, the English Crest was adopted in 1837. If Knights Templar/Freemason geniuses had in mind to produce Family Tree forgery, it wouldn't be difficult for them to do so.
The English Flag is a Knights Templar/Freemason Flag. Knights Templar/Freemason are Roman Catholic Soldiers. That means England has been under the control of the Universal Roman Catholic Church for centuries.
The Lion and the Unicorn - Wikipedia
Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom - Wikipedia
The elements go back much further. Its a pretty long time to start a fraud. Not beyond the realm of possibility, but it seems a bit of a stretch.
You read what i wrote, don't put words in my mouth
You can be extremely well scrounging and give very little to your country, do you agree with this?
Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
The Claim to the throne of England is Hereditary.
Daniel 4:17
17 This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.
There is a Throne in Heaven and a Throne on Earth. Elohim/God rules in Heaven and on Earth, therefore, the Earthly Throne is Elohim's/God's Throne.
Acts 18:18
18 And Paul after this tarried there yet a good while, and then took his leave of the brethren, and sailed thence into Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila; having shorn his head in Cenchrea: for he had a vow.
When a couple marry they take Vows/Oaths to be Faithful. In the same way entering into a Covenant with Elohim/God means taking an Oath to do the duties of the Covenant and receiving Elohim's/God's promises of said Covenant.
Paul, a Servant of Yeshua Messiah/Jesus Christ, took Oaths.
firedragon
Veteran Member
Yeah. True. You cant teach a horse to understand certain things about what GDP is and how it works.
Very true. You are wrong.
Great. Explained already. I mean, spoon-fed.
Centuries of economic stagnation under a parasitic and bigoted foreign elite who grew increasingly oppressive as they tried to wring ever more money from the population, decreasing per capita GDP, imperial collapse leading to loss of central control, militarisation of society, decades of warfare and rebellion against the Mughals, invasion by the Persian who carried off the equivalent of over $100 billion in loot, grasping warlords fighting each other and oppressing the people = "Doing great"
Here's 18th C historian Ghulam Hussein Khan's take on "doing fine" after the Persian sack of Delhi:
It is from those times must be dated the sinking of rents, the decrease of husbandry, the distress of the people and their detestation of their Rulers. Nor was anything else thought of, but how to bring money to hand by any means whatever. This and this alone became the utmost ambition of all ranks.
It was in such an enfeebled state of the Empire, that there arose a new sort of men, who so far from setting up patterns of piety and virtue, squandered away the lives and properties of the poor with so much barefacedness, that other men, on beholding their conduct, became bolder and bolder, and practised the worst and ugliest action, without fear or remorse. From those men sprung an infinity of evil-doers, who plague the Indian world, and grind the faces of its wretched inhabitants …
Evils are now arisen to such a height, as render a remedy impossible. It is a consequence of such wretched administrations that every part of India has gone to ruin. So that, comparing the present times with the past, one is apt to think that this world is overwhelmed with darkness
Rhetoric ignoring the argument because of identification of a big mistake.
The British enter a country with a biggest GDP in the world, and exit it with a very tiny GDP percentage in the world. A thief.
firedragon
Veteran Member
Cute. The dcvidic bloodline and God's rite was probably the most evil thief to have ever lived.
The English flag is st George's cross who lived hundreds of years before the templars and 1400 years before the freemasons. The freemasons are not a Catholic organisation, never were, though they will allow Catholics into their membership
Augustus
…
Yes, you've illustrated that you have no clue about what is shown by looking at GDP as a percentage of total world GDP shows.
Or that you don't understand what GDP as a percentage of global GDP says about how well governed a society is or what it says about the average person in the society.
Yes, I spoon fed you the reasons it wasn't "doing great".
You ignored them of course and just asserted you are right because you say so.
My big mistake was assuming you could understand basic concepts and engage in rational discussion
You still don't get it...
You don't understand history
You don't understand GDP per capita
You don't understand GDP as a share of global GDP and what factors impact it.
You don't understand the industrial revolution or how it impacted traditional manufacturing.
You don't understand how changes in global trade would have impacted India's economy in any circumstances.
You don't understand that, according to your "logic", the fact Europe has seen a bigger decrease in its GDP share in less than half the time must be evidence of massively declining standards of living and one of the greatest crimes in history.
You do you though...
Last edited:
firedragon
Veteran Member
Strawman. Happens when people make bogus arguments but are too childish.
Strawman. Happens when people make bogus arguments but are too childish.
Happens when people make bogus arguments but are too childish.
Grow up soon.
England invaded a country that was contributing the most GDP and left it poor. A thief. You have tried to make it a "Muslim thing", and that's why you have never addressed Sri Lanka.
For the umpteenth time. As cheap as could be.
Elihoenai
Well-Known Member
John 10:10
10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
I'm Elohim/God Over and Above Country. Having Elohim/God Over and Above Country you do the best for your country.
Having Satan/Devil Over and Above Country you do the worst for your country.
Augustus
…
Nope. Try reading properly next time.
Again it was conquered by a private corporation overwhelmingly funded and fought for by Indians.
After the Raj though, it was left with a higher per capita GDP than the Mughals who you insist were "doing great"
(I think they were both pretty bad)
Seeing as you are incapable of actual argument or logical thought, just vapid, unsupported assertions, further discussion is pointless.
I'll just repeat the findings of an prominent Indian scholar on the impacts of colonial rule on inequality and impoverishment:
In the most accepted view on inequality in colonial India, inequality increased between the propertied and the property-less because of capitalist exploitation and colonial institutional intervention, and between the colonists and the indigenes because of unequal political power. The paper rejects the thesis.. The extractive power of the state is overstated... Colonial economic policies were good for business, and had a weak effect on agriculture. To sum up, there was the emergence of a middle-class that gained from the open trading economy. There was no other pattern of much significance.
firedragon
Veteran Member
Nope. Try reading properly next time.
Again it was conquered by a private corporation overwhelmingly funded and fought for by Indians.
After the Raj though, it was left with a higher per capita GDP than the Mughals who you insist were "doing great"
(I think they were both pretty bad)
Seeing as you are incapable of actual argument or logical thought, just vapid, unsupported assertions, further discussion is pointless.
I'll just repeat the findings of an prominent Indian scholar on the impacts of colonial rule on inequality and impoverishment:
In the most accepted view on inequality in colonial India, inequality increased between the propertied and the property-less because of capitalist exploitation and colonial institutional intervention, and between the colonists and the indigenes because of unequal political power. The paper rejects the thesis.. The extractive power of the state is overstated... Colonial economic policies were good for business, and had a weak effect on agriculture. To sum up, there was the emergence of a middle-class that gained from the open trading economy. There was no other pattern of much significance.
England stole from India, Sri Lanka, and many other countries around the world. But it just happens I know more about India because I have studied it.
India went from the biggest contributor in terms of GDP to the world, to one of the smallest with such a big big population. Thieving, England grew so fast it was amazing. Thief.
I will also "repeat" an Indian scholar. Well, I have done in every single post where you have tried your aunt sally's.
You didn't even understand your own "cut and paste". As you said, you made some "silly" arguments. England was a thief.