How could someone be insulted

If a human coerces in science you false preach. You get offended as cult group human ideals is argument by presence a human belief of a human only.

Group position denotes most powerful and richest human.

So if you say words were sophism first used first many lots of words so I could use science. Law said words are evil in fact.

You say O earth Inherited light on one side sun C value. O of God earth planet.

Constant.

As O earth as the body spins rotates inherits C light constant. Itself first a planet only described human word.

As O D involved O poles of O planet involved in lights status.

You aren't O planet earth the God earth body that factually Inherited the light constant only.

So you taught only earth owned the light constant by symbol.C...half body.

Science. Natural only observation by natural humans.

So if you then preach human's owned the light constant is second term not first words is a misappropriation of origin word use applied.

Coercion exact. Was a human stated purpose a diction ary teaching stating no argument allowed about meanings.

As law imposed word meaning first.

Humans laws by its own word use.

The word of God about God was first with God planet only terms. Said human law. For human life's protection versus science of human satanisms.

Valjean said:

I'm insulted when the opinions I post are not attacked by those who don't agree with them.
Isn't the goal to discover the objective truth of things? How am I to correct errors in my facts or reasoning if they're not pointed out by others?

Click to expand...

You are assuming, erroneously I suggest, that because a particular scientific method works for one field of human inquiry or endeavour, it must be appropriate for all. You misuse a principle intended for a specific purpose, when you attempt to make it generic.

“If a theory is found to be non-scientific, or metaphysical, it is not thereby found to be unimportant, or insignificant, or meaningless or nonsensical…Thus the problem which I tried to solve by proposing the criterion of falsifiability was neither a problem of meaningfulness or significance, nor a problem of truth or acceptability. It was the problem of drawing a line between the statements, or system of statements, of the empirical sciences, and all other statements…I called this…the problem of demarcation.”

- Karl Popper

First of all ...
only natural human life exists as terms humans only as their own biological position.

No house no food no water.

Exact place natural.

No science no thesis no false use of human only advice. Science owns no superior status. It is chosen only.

Proven is your claim by destroyer machines attacking earths natural mass of any type including chemicals first.

You preached dusts supported humans biological life no science eas allowed. As science the topic chosen lied.

Natural awareness how to medically assist another human was in nature's and humans presence first...not science.

To own a choice....as the human.

A human builds a machine themselves.

The scientific human used advice then says direct to the human thinking my machines now exists before life.

As if it magically manifested.

That exact use human consciousness doesn't lie using human consciousness says however human consciousness just lied.

Is a humans life warning about terms Christ consciousness.

Christ gases are atmospheric space held and are nothing like as comparable to earths mass.

Said a human scientist.

Theist however says as my machine works I'm proven correct. Two types machines originally designed.

One machine using earths heavens transmitters only...non reactive.

The other machine ground mass reacting that changed their other machines signals. Both machine places temple in pyramid blew up. Proven lying.

Machines blow up when you change the ground mass where a machine came from.

Humans life attacked says you're lying you didn't invent life by a new position the machine and your man thesis.
And then a second reactive be mass equals third position reaction.

Said by that type of teaching three as a theist lying said as a human that their thoughts knew why a human life existed and themed a reaction first.

In a nature ground reaction first exact position a human is killed. Proven wrong the human AI theist who owned his machines before bio life ever existed in biology...as he's a magician.

First machine human living with transmitters biology health harmed only.

Men said after I built church was years after star fall kept burning our heads repetere. Peter.

I said no more science allowed I don't control stars fall. Star fall attacked life 0AD 1000 years later.

Church didn't establish a no science law until it had.

Hence the advice covered both human machine science causes and star falls advice as two evil terms only.

New sciences advice history.

Seeker of White Light said:

I wonder how someone can be insulted by a person who only ask questions, to clerify what the other person actually mean in discussion.

I can understand if someone directly try to offend, that people get insulted, but in a normal discussion?

Click to expand...

I can choose to be insulted or not. Really, IMO has nothing to do with anything you say.

I prefer it control when and where I choose to be insulted.

Many though still let other folks control how they feel.

Nakosis said:

I can choose to be insulted or not. Really, IMO has nothing to do with anything you say.

I prefer it control when and where I choose to be insulted.

Many though still let other folks control how they feel.

Click to expand...

The OP is not about me i do not get insulted easy.

Revoltingest said:

Usually, I find that people take offense because
they misunderstand the intent of the question.
It's a case of projecting their own insecurities
& hostilities upon the questioner.

Click to expand...

I suspect angry folks tend to project a lot.

Seeker of White Light said:

The OP is not about me i do not get insulted easy.

Click to expand...

Ok, I mean "you" in the general sense.

Perhaps better to say IMO has nothing to do with anything someone else says.

Seeker of White Light said:

The OP is not about me i do not get insulted easy.

Click to expand...

Are you sure about that?

Seeker of White Light said:

Are you trying to insult me in a thread about being insulted? Very smart move....

Click to expand...

9-10ths_Penguin said:

Are you sure about that?

Click to expand...

Yes I am sure about that. But I will respond when someone trying to **** me of on purpose

Seeker of White Light said:

Yes I am sure about that. But I will respond when someone trying to **** me of on purpose

Click to expand...

But that's the thing: I wasn't trying to **** you off.

Nakosis said:

I suspect angry folks tend to project a lot.

Click to expand...

Aye, to be ruled by negative emotion
does seem to have that property.

Seeker of White Light said:

I wonder how someone can be insulted by a person who only ask questions, to clerify what the other person actually mean in discussion.

I can understand if someone directly try to offend, that people get insulted, but in a normal discussion?

Click to expand...

It feels that way, when these questioning becomes "defeating the opponent" in arguments.

If a man egotistical first theories science ...bible said man was first with God then he theoried maths science cosmic. Zero space mother womb.sophia.

Man and maths. Not natural life.

Not a mother.
Not a woman.
Not female.

Just science.

You get life attacked conjurung para at your side.

Science the scientist.

Science tells the scientist you're wrong.

As words and symbols don't own natural they Infer.

You get insulted when a human says don't choose science as it's artificial.

No natural law is doing what you do. Taking natural created creation by machines into unnatural fixed places natural hadn't.

Then you get an earthquake carpenter that didn't shut off for four days.

What AI means in science. I tried to force change natural law.

As natural had shut off react in reactions.

You say I believe in AI not God as you named God. Any of your subjects you lied about.

So you get upset yet you were taught many times science isn't laws of natural.

Still are the same egotists.

You get recreated in atmospheric evolution is a conscious humans experience re development. Healing.....Maybe you use your bio conscious to make false ideals in natural creation.

Being insulted by your own consciousness human and man owned.

Seeker of White Light said:

I wonder how someone can be insulted by a person who only ask questions, to clerify what the other person actually mean in discussion.

I can understand if someone directly try to offend, that people get insulted, but in a normal discussion?

Click to expand...

It depends how you ask the questions.
When conversing with someone, the most important thing is to understand each language.
You can ask someone for example: "Where was God in the holocaust"...
Some might find it offensive as it is asked with the "hint" idea that God doesn't exist or else the holocaust wouldn't happen (which is not true, btw).
In my POV, the one asking the question, must know how to ask it in the language of the person he asks it, and the person answering should answer it in the language of the person who is asking the question.
This is not an easy task, and this is why we see so many people fighting instead of actually communicating.
You can see it in the news mostly, how the reporters many times ask a question just to pass their own message and not really for the actual answer.

In my human memory female I never argued against our holy spiritual father.

Our brother however did by thinking.

Words. Abnormal words to life's living naturally as natural position word use.

Basic human advice.

Spiritual life human spiritual behaviour human natural love.

Scientists a theist spoke against father human life with gods spirituality by his science themed words.

I had a human female vision. I was in England we were spiritually thinking and trying to stop Hitler.

It was all about the holy grail gods powers.

So he theories as evil men do that the Jewish human DNA was connected to it. When in the vicinity Egypt were a lot of Egyptian tribes DNA owned by sex varied as life body type.

Yet you were all actually Egyptian. You would be insulted if taught that advice. Yet scientists using technology power of God nuclear hurt us all.

So to teach why is to teach the truth yet it can be insulting inferred.

So God was never nuclear God was a term gas spirit in life's bio conscious first place heavens life.

So science never gained God. As our God we live within is our heavens is not ground mass.

Was our human teaching.

We always were with our God.

We don't own sciences evil God terms ground nuclear particle dust mass.

Humans who enjoy evil thinking as selves are by human only personality types first the thinker. So if you know a humans personality type lies first then destroyer humans are supported by rich men to kill us all.

If rich men find these comments insulting is because you deserve it.

Segev Moran said:

It depends how you ask the questions.
When conversing with someone, the most important thing is to understand each language.
You can ask someone for example: "Where was God in the holocaust"...
Some might find it offensive as it is asked with the "hint" idea that God doesn't exist or else the holocaust wouldn't happen (which is not true, btw).
In my POV, the one asking the question, must know how to ask it in the language of the person he asks it, and the person answering should answer it in the language of the person who is asking the question.
This is not an easy task, and this is why we see so many people fighting instead of actually communicating.
You can see it in the news mostly, how the reporters many times ask a question just to pass their own message and not really for the actual answer.

Click to expand...

I don't find it too difficult to speak on a level ground as the individual I'm replying/questioning...

Perhaps it is a result of my own biased perception, but it seems like there's an infatuation with condescending conversation and dramatically attempts at exposal of motives. Counter-speaking is more attractive than cooperatively speaking. I blame politicians/lawyers and their double-speak along with their groupies within the corporate media institutions.

Mark Charles Compton said:

I don't find it too difficult to speak on a level ground as the individual I'm replying/questioning...

Perhaps it is a result of my own biased perception, but it seems like there's an infatuation with condescending conversation and dramatically attempts at exposal of motives. Counter-speaking is more attractive than cooperatively speaking. I blame politicians/lawyers and their double-speak along with their groupies within the corporate media institutions.

Click to expand...

Not sure I understand what you wrote.
Can you give an example?

Segev Moran said:

Not sure I understand what you wrote.
Can you give an example?

Click to expand...

I was simply on a rant regarding conversation and responses that seem intentionally condescending, divisive, or combative. It's my presumption that prominent members within the political and economic spheres have played a direct role in popularizing and romanticizing such styles of conversation.

eg. Overgeneralization of all members of one or more groups as possessing the least desirable traits or ideals held by fringe extremists within the groups' ranks. For example, despite popular belief not 'all liberals are socialist snowflakes' and not 'all conservatives are racist nationalists'.

Seeker of White Light said:

I wonder how someone can be insulted by a person who only ask questions, to clerify what the other person actually mean in discussion.

I can understand if someone directly try to offend, that people get insulted, but in a normal discussion?

Click to expand...

Some people are not interested in discussion and they do not want to answer questions or explain why they say what they do. Some people are here just to make smart-*** condescending comments for attention. Others just want you to agree with what they say with no questions asked.