RestlessSoul
Well-Known Member
Considerably less improbable than the statistical near-impossibility of our universe developing in just the way it has, to allow galaxies to form and life to emerge in at least one corner thereof.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What does science think will disprove God?And what do Christians think will prove God?
- Thread starter Frank Goad
- Start date
Considerably less improbable than the statistical near-impossibility of our universe developing in just the way it has, to allow galaxies to form and life to emerge in at least one corner thereof.
firedragon
Veteran Member
firedragon
Veteran Member
What does science think will disprove God?And what do Christians think will prove God?Just curious.
As said by Alt above, science cannot prove or disprove God via induction because science has a methodology called naturalism.
The only way for Christians to prove God exists is via philosophical arguments. They can use science as a part of their deduction.
PruePhillip
Well-Known Member
What does science think will disprove God?And what do Christians think will prove God?Just curious.
We don't ask, 'What is your science?'
We ask, 'What is your FAITH.' --- you prove these thing through your personal experience.
firedragon
Veteran Member
If science follows naturalism, how would evidence for a supernatural be presented?
Thats an oxymoron.
firedragon
Veteran Member
I have heard people say this. But it's absurd. No one knows if God performs these so called "miracles" that you are referring to. You are stemming from the wish-maker's dreams. That means, someone wishes he gets a ton of gold to appear in his room. These statements you make are just apologetics.
And you made a claim that "we have found that God doesn't answer prayers or perform miracles". How did your "we" group who ever you are referring to do that?
Can you provide the study data, sample sizes, sampling methods etc??
Thanks.
stvdv
Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Science below mind, God beyond mind
Hence
Science lacks Wisdom to disprove God
@stvdvRF(God)
Last edited:
stvdv
Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Science below mind, God beyond mindAnd what do Christians think will prove God?Just curious.
Hence
To get proof you must go beyond mind
But
Proof is a mental thing at best
Hence
Well...need I say more?
@stvdvRF(God)
Last edited:
First, not "disprove", rather, "demonstrate the strong likelihood of the non-existence of".What does science think will disprove God?And what do Christians think will prove God?Just curious.
Second, what real thing is a "God"?
If, using your answer to that question, we find a real suspect, what test will determine whether it's God or not?
RestlessSoul
Well-Known Member
stvdv
Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
IF above about Science is true
THEN science lacks interest in God
BECAUSE God is beyond measurable
AND
IF Atheist uses Science while debating God
THEN Atheist lacks interest in God
Hence useless to debate for me
@stvdvRF(God)
Segev Moran
Well-Known Member
You cannot disprove God same as you cannot Prove it.What does science think will disprove God?And what do Christians think will prove God?Just curious.
It cannot be disproved as God is a non physical concept and science only deals with the physical "realm".
For the same reason, you cannot prove Gods exsitence.
You can, however, try to prove Gods affect on the physical world, yet it will only prove something beyond the known physical is happening and not necessarily God.
At least with the unicorn you know it's equine, has a single horn mid-forehead and only talks to virgins.
God? It's as though [he]'s only an idea, a concept with no external counterpart ─ indeed, were it otherwise, we could take God's photograph, [he] could appear on TV, give concerts ...
RestlessSoul
Well-Known Member
Science cannot disprove things that are not falsifiable, including the vanilla versions of Gods circulating today.What does science think will disprove God?And what do Christians think will prove God?Just curious.
but it can make them superfluous.
ciao
- viole
RestlessSoul
Well-Known Member
Well, I never said God, gods are not needed. Actually, that is why I think people believe in Them.
So, to be precise, I need to expand. Science can make gods superfluous as explanation of the natural world.
better?
ciao
- viole
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
That depends on what version of science you use. I have another version of science.
No definition in terms appropriate to something with objective existence, only fairytale qualities like omnipotence, omniscience, perfection; never appears, never says, never does; explicable as a sociological and psychological phenomenon but has no characteristics of real objects and entities ─ no just not seen, but not meaningfully described.
At least if you were looking for a unicorn, you'd know one if you found one, and you could bring it back for inspection, make videos and photos of it, and so on.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
I have a different understand of science. So to me, science can neither prove nor disprove the metaphysical version of the supernatural.