I wonder why the moderator allows YOU to say my @ss is blowing smoke out???????? And nobody asks you to quote your source. Who cares really? Back to the point:
Planck time or Planck lenght? Please define a UNIQUE definition of time accepted by every scientists in the world and WHY would be unlikly at Planck level for a cherub to act in a wave function. In fact if we believe what religious account explain they can act in a wave function.
You say Hert frequence or the action of hallucinogenic would be detected. Please refer the tests and names of scientists who have been doing tests in that sense with shamans or people who immediately after they take drugs they attempt to kill their kids. This doesn't happen in all cases so how do the scientists knew to make the proper "measures" in the right time?
Cheap argument everytime there's no scientific answer you say repeated experiences must be all lies!
There is no physics in metaphysics you say. I say, there's a lot of metaphysics in a "science" called physics.
If Einstein believed gravity is an illusion due to deformation of space, I'll rather believe HIM than other respected points of view. Or at least wait to see IF (conditional again) IF gravitons are observed or likely to be real than accepting this as fact. It's not a fact, it's another speculation that remains to be check in the future.
The universe is expanding many scientists believe. But not everybody believes that. Some of them think is another illusion created by the curvature of the cosmos. IF (again a conditional, not a fact) IF the universe is expanding (I don't see why not but it's still need to be proved) THAT'S WHY some scientists believe the universe will end in a Big Rip. We don't know if there's gonna be or not a Big Crunch among other reasons cos we don't know if some particles have enough mass permiting the Big Crunch. It's believed not but then again we don't know yet. Until then the ????? is open. Not closed as Q pretends it to be.
The idea of Matrix universe is not done by amateur knowing LESS than Q but experts, so I gave the names and I repeat them again: Jacob B. Bekenstein, professor of Theoretial Physics at Hebrew Univ in Jerusalem, recipient of Rothschild Prize and John Wheeler. Perhaps we need to see your works printed in Scientific American
If those names are not enough, any reader can search physicist David Bohm from London University, expert in quantum field and neurophysiologist Karl Pribram from Stanford University.
Q says: Please dont confuse anthropologists with the likes of Dr. Dan. This guy is the poster child of kooks. Biowarfare, mind-melds with a living extraterrestrial, daily angel visits, designer viruses that incorporate lethal ET strains, stargate transmissions, remote viewing, astrology, Catholic-mysticism, Judaic-kaballa, human subjects, abductions, treaties with extraterrestrials, area-51, abducted when 9 years old, a Ganesh particle that conveys healing and possibly immortality, covert operations, pole shifts, 2012, fate of the planet, black ops, broken bones from heavy-handed handlers, 4" x 1/4" scar up the back of his head. The good doctor has it all. "
No. That's not the case. That's a general statement done to answer anything to disregard the scientists after reading general themes in the site. Dan only studies Ganesh particle.