• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Actor has shown God, hasn't he?

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
No proof given..sorry
You should be. You should be sorry. You have sinned.

It is Nihilism to reply ``there are no proofs'' without reporting mistakes.
Otherwise, it is crazy trolling and bullying, like in the case against Jesus:
``If I said something wrong, show what is wrong. But if I spoke the truth,
why did you strike Me?'' John 18:23.

F. Nietzsche defines Nihilism as rejecting an obvious truth, like 2+2=4.
I have proofs because I was trying to write mathematical proofs, not a
description of how to castrate a cat or something. I explicitly put the word
``proof'' into the text. This proof is unpublished yet, but it is a valid
proof until mistakes are reported. Please do not reply to me in such a
Nihilistic, discriminatory way, saying:

You have no proof, not because we have a report of mistakes, but because
we do not trust you. We rely only upon famous authors and professors of
mathematics. The well-known scientific problems are not for you. They are for
famous, established authors only.

It is natural for ordinary persons to feel distrust and rejection against an
unfamiliar, low score, unpublished author because the true information must
come from a trustful source. This condition for the validity of information has
already been described in the first century: ``Nazareth! Can anything
good come from there?'' John 1:46. But this self-protection instinct is abnormal for
scientific journals; they are the Enterprises of Truth Making with the
duty to deal fairly with such unacknowledged, ``dirty'', unknown authors.
Hollywood is the star-making factory, and the journal is the truth
making factory.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
You should be. You should be sorry. You have sinned.

It is Nihilism to reply ``there are no proofs'' without reporting mistakes.
Otherwise, it is crazy trolling and bullying, like in the case against Jesus:
``If I said something wrong, show what is wrong. But if I spoke the truth,
why did you strike Me?'' John 18:23.

F. Nietzsche defines Nihilism as rejecting an obvious truth, like 2+2=4.
I have proofs because I was trying to write mathematical proofs, not a
description of how to castrate a cat or something. I explicitly put the word
``proof'' into the text. This proof is unpublished yet, but it is a valid
proof until mistakes are reported. Please do not reply to me in such a
Nihilistic, discriminatory way, saying:

You have no proof, not because we have a report of mistakes, but because
we do not trust you. We rely only upon famous authors and professors of
mathematics. The well-known scientific problems are not for you. They are for
famous, established authors only.

It is natural for ordinary persons to feel distrust and rejection against an
unfamiliar, low score, unpublished author because the true information must
come from a trustful source. This condition for the validity of information has
already been described in the first century: ``Nazareth! Can anything
good come from there?'' John 1:46. But this self-protection instinct is abnormal for
scientific journals; they are the Enterprises of Truth Making with the
duty to deal fairly with such unacknowledged, ``dirty'', unknown authors.
Hollywood is the star-making factory, and the journal is the truth
making factory.
You call me a skinner, without k owing me personally, who is bullying whom?

Do you have evidence i have sinned?
Or you just say it, because I have yet to hear your evidence of truth in your paper?

Disagreeing is not the same as sin.

Do you see your self as "better" or less "sinful" than other people?
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
Please look the video.


God's name is Goodness, Fearlessness, Heroism, Love. The fighter in the clip has demonstrated all these names. He has shown God does exist.


Can a fighter or soldier demonstrate qualities of God? I suppose that in some ways he is good, but, in general, God is suppose to be for peace....."thou shalt not kill" . . . "turn the other cheek."
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
You should be sorry because it is sin. Any sinner works for the Angel of Death.


Many were tortured for having what someone perceived to be the "wrong" religion. Many more were scared into religion (burning in hell for all eternity). Many more were labeled as Satanic (or in this case, called the Angel of Death), and some were hung/hanged as witches, drowned in witch tests, or shunned as unchristian. Disagreeing with those in charge of the religion was quite dangerous. Do we now return to those Dark Ages?
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
Angel is perfect:


Satan was an angel, and supposedly more perfect than any other. Yet, it was the perfection that forced God to banish Satan to hell. Satan was challenging God's power, and felt that he was better. Obviously, Satan was cast to hell, perfect or not.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
That's poetry. It's not literally saying life is meaningless.
Solomon said that about life without God long ago, it's like chasing the wind. But his conclusion was that honoring and obeying God is the whole duty of man.

"Out, out, brief candle [suicide]. Life is but a walking shadow--a poor player who struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more. [Life] Tis a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

Theists often claim that God gives meaning to life.

Atheists find them own meanings and joys in life. They are not without meaning.

Some believe that they should end their lives to join God (Jim Jones cult....Heaven's Gate cult). Some believe that they can kill others for fun (Manson clan (including Reverend Tex Watson)). Perhaps religious dogma leads to harmful ideas? Viewing life pragmatically might be preferable.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
The
That's poetry. It's not literally saying life is meaningless.
Solomon said that about life without God long ago, it's like chasing the wind. But his conclusion was that honoring and obeying God is the whole duty of man.

The theme song of Mash (TV show) say: "Through early morning fog I see, visions of the things to be, and this is what I'd like to find, suicide and peace of mind." The words (not music) were written by the teenaged son of the person in charge of the show. It was about young men seeing their army buddies blow up by mortar fire, and shot with machine guns, and they figured that there was no way out of the war except in a pine coffin. They felt that instant death was preferable to the slow wait of their inevitable fate.

This demonstrates that war cheapens life. We can see from W. Bush's war in Iraq, that killed a million Iraqis (though Iraq had no link to terrorism), that life became worthless and human lives (God's children) became expendible. Violating God's commands ("thou shalt not kill"...."turn the other cheek,"...etc.) results in death and destruction to innocents.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Many were tortured for having what someone perceived to be the "wrong" religion. Many more were scared into religion (burning in hell for all eternity). Many more were labeled as Satanic (or in this case, called the Angel of Death), and some were hung/hanged as witches, drowned in witch tests, or shunned as unchristian. Disagreeing with those in charge of the religion was quite dangerous. Do we now return to those Dark Ages?
The pain and suffering inflicted to theists by atheists is 100000000 times greater.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
Bible does not interpret itself. One needs TRUE Church, which tells you how to understand what the authors of this Ancient Book have meant.

Opinion of Clara Tea:

Should we get advice from PhD theologist Reverend John Hagee, who tells us that we need to pray to Jesus to win the war in Iraq (that is, kill more effectively)? Do the highly educated, who dedicated their lives to God really understand "thou shalt not kill" and "turn the other cheek?"

Should we get advice on charity from Reverend Jim and Tammy Fay Bakker? They elicited donations to stick-limbed starving Africans, then absconded with the money for their mansion (which the conceiled by putting it in their lawyer's name).

When we find highly educated theists who are on their way to hell, should we follow them there? Or, should we find our own paths? Should we interpret the bible for ourselves? After all, it is our character and our judgement that will ultimately decide if we go to heaven or hell.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Atheists find them own meanings and joys in life. They are not without meaning.
Ordinary people, the atheists seem to be ordinary, have devil the tempter and holy angel inside (or outside, by the side of the human) the heart. That is why atheists do not commit suicide out of Nihilism. Recall how pigs in the Bible were killed by spirits.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
Dear lady, please start to read the formulas. They have near zero complexity.

Einstein felt that the lack of complexity of equations of highly involved physics was a sign of God. For example, E = mc^2 is very simple (derived from several pages of calculations and explanations of the physics).

In fact, Einstein had initially rejected quantum mechanics because of its complexity and its reliance on statistics "God playing dice with the universe."

I think that math works without the intervention of God. I think that much of the universe works the way formulas predict (and many of them rely on math). It is as if God made everything work on its own, without his intervention (if God made everything). This gives both theists and atheists ideas about the existence of God (God cannot be proven to exist). It could be that God is intentionally hiding. Why not show himself (probably because that would ruin free choice). Who would choose to disbelieve in God if God proves his existence?
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
In fact, Einstein had initially rejected quantum mechanics because of its complexity and its reliance on statistics "God playing dice with the universe."
How interesting. You are not far from the salvation!

Let me pleasure your sense for new discovery in the ResearchGate file:

Recall that Dmitri Mendeleev -the founder of modern Chemistry- was deprived of
getting the Nobel Prize; hence, even a perfect genius can have ``bad luck'' in
getting Nobel Prize. Recall the Bad Luck of the most gifted actor -in my opinion-
Leonardo DiCaprio to get his first Oscar Award. The exemptions from Cosmic
Censorship mean the Real Singularity, hence destroying the essential law
of energy-momentum conservation. Indeed, there is a chance for such
a ``mind-blowing'' event. So, let us rely on Luck, which does not allow this
Singularity to form or ever touch matter.

Consider the quantum entanglement of two particles.
Albert Einstein -the founder of Quantum Physics- has not accepted this
``spooky action on distance.''
Now I explain the entanglement by using Luck.
If we have measured the spin of the first particle +1, we are lucky enough to
measure the spin -1 of the second particle. However, the probability of the
latter event is 50 %.
 
Top