• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Daniel 12:2

Brian2

Veteran Member
So Jesus did not directly claim to be God, but because he said God is his 'father' it means that he was indirectly claiming that he is God?

You see what you did there?

I can see what you are saying that I did but you have picked up the tricks of your teachers when you only quote part of what I said and so misrepresent what I said.
 

Triumph

FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Plenty of people have been deceived into believing that Jesus is not the Son of God. He is the Son of God in the way that it is consistent for Thomas to call Jesus "My God". (John 20:28)
Same nature.
Thomas did not call Jesus his God. Thomas was praising his God for resurrecting His son Jesus. Jesus accepted the word Lord only as a teacher. Lord is a expression of respect ( similar to the word Mister) for a man such as a king, prince, military commander, landowner, slave owner and husband. Jesus is none of those but the word "Lord" is also used for a respected teacher and Jesus did accept being called Lord in that context as he faithfully taught the words of God, his Father.
ALL Lords are beneath God because they are all men and God is not a man. Some kings did claim to be the Lord thy God, demanding the right to kill anyone they pleased as if they were a God. What those kings, sons of Abraham, desired to happen they claimed Lord God desired it. Those men wanted the same power over people that the pharaohs of Egypt had that claimed to BE Gods passing the title "God" to their bloodline sons that also claimed to be Gods. Jesus taught no man is a God.
Jesus said no man has seen the face of God and people looked at the face of Jesus often, so Jesus never taught he is God. Jesus did say Angels of children see God's face. God wants people to love and protect all children.
Matthew 18:10
Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.

1 John 4:12
No man hath seen God at any time. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us." Jesus is one with the words he hears from God and taught them correctly and faithfully.
 
Last edited:

Brian2

Veteran Member
Thomas did not call Jesus his God. Thomas was praising his God for resurrecting His son Jesus.

I have heard a number of explanations for what Thomas said to try to make it look as if Thomas was not saying to Jesus "My Lord and my God" and meaning it just as it sounds. So really I don't have to say anything about your explanation.

Jesus accepted the word Lord only as a teacher. Lord is a expression of respect ( similar to the word Mister) for a man such as a king, prince, military commander, landowner, slave owner and husband. Jesus is none of those but the word "Lord" is also used for a respected teacher and Jesus did accept being called Lord in that context as he faithfully taught the words of God, his Father.

The disciples only started calling Jesus "Lord" after His resurrection. That is the context.
It is amazing that you think that when Thomas said "My Lord and my God" the term "my Lord" applies to Jesus but the term "My God" does not apply to Jesus.

ALL Lords are beneath God because they are all men and God is not a man. Some kings did claim to be the Lord thy God, demanding the right to kill anyone they pleased as if they were a God. What those kings, sons of Abraham, desired to happen they claimed Lord God desired it. Those men wanted the same power over people that the pharaohs of Egypt had that claimed to BE Gods passing the title "God" to their bloodline sons that also claimed to be Gods. Jesus taught no man is a God.

Not all Lords were men in those days. I'm sure there were many Lord gods in other religions.
When did Jesus teach that no man is a God? Jesus did teach that the Jewish judges had been called gods (Ps 82, John 10:35)

Jesus said no man has seen the face of God and people looked at the face of Jesus often, so Jesus never taught he is God. Jesus did say Angels of children see God's face. God wants people to love and protect all children.
Matthew 18:10
Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.

1 John 4:12
No man hath seen God at any time. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us." Jesus is one with the words he hears from God and taught them correctly and faithfully.

The Old Testament does say that people saw God. How do you explain that seeming contradiction?
 

Triumph

FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Jesus is the Son of the Father, equal in nature to the Father, whom Jesus calls the one true God.
Correct that Jesus is the Son of the Father, a unique creation unlike any other man on Earth.
Jesus is not "equal in nature" to God because only God is good. Jesus had the sin of wrath, anger when he caused physical harm to men in the temple when Jesus knew God commanded him to love even his enemies as beloved family. Jesus wanted to save their lives and had no intention of killing them but did not teach in the manner of mercy and kindness that God told Jesus to teach. That is a reason Jesus was required by God to show submission and repentance by being water baptized to make himself whole to enable God to forgive him for his unkind acts. What Jesus did is not a deadly sin but it was an offense to God, an act of disobedience.
 

Triumph

FREEDOM OF SPEECH
I have heard a number of explanations for what Thomas said to try to make it look as if Thomas was not saying to Jesus "My Lord and my God" and meaning it just as it sounds. So really I don't have to say anything about your explanation.
.

The disciples only started calling Jesus "Lord" after His resurrection. That is the context.

NO, Jesus was called " Lord" throughout his ministry for example:
Luke 6:46
“And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?”

It is amazing that you think that when Thomas said "My Lord and my God" the term "my Lord" applies to Jesus but the term "My God" does not apply to Jesus.

NO it is not, Jesus has to ask advice of God because Jesus lacks knowledge and has to be told information because Jesus does not know everything. Only God knows everything. Jesus said he could pray to God for the use of Angels but Jesus can not command Angels to serve him by his own power. Angels of God love Jesus the Son of God but they obey only the commands of God, the Father. God alone decides how the power of Angels will be used.
Jesus never called himself God and did not want people to worship him even though some people did anyway against the wishes of Jesus. Jesus was compelled to teach prayer is to God the Father creator of all life on Earth not to Jesus, "Our Father which is in heaven." Jesus did not create life, God the Father did, but Jesus does try to save the eternal life of all humans God created on Earth.



Not all Lords were men in those days. I'm sure there were many Lord gods in other religions.
When did Jesus teach that no man is a God? Jesus did teach that the Jewish judges had been called gods (Ps 82, John 10:35)

Sons of Abraham, the temple priests, claim they are BORN holy as Gods under the covenant of Abraham while other men are not.
Like King David, they do any sin they desire to do with no punishment given to them by man. By law the sons of Abraham claim is from Lord God, David is cut off from his people and should be stoned to death for adultery. David did not care what God Commands because David coveted, he committed adultery, demanded war, had innocent people killed, deceived his people, threatened to kill his ruler, satanically mutilated the dead, rejected his first wife, danced naked in front of virgins not caring about their virtue and murdered his own son for wanting his throne. David was so lawless and such a bad father that David was unable to raise a righteous son that proved that fact by raping his sister. David is in no way a blessed by God bloodline ( blood of incest that carries possibility of damaged DNA and birth defects) but David had his scribes write that he is. Woe to those scribes because they receive the same damnation!



The Old Testament does say that people saw God. How do you explain that seeming contradiction?

Jesus said many times, "WOE TO SCRIBES" because what is written about the "royal bloodline" of Abraham that they alone are blessed by God to rule are lies that Abraham, the Father of that Lie he is blessed by God, and Abraham's "sons" that want the throne Abraham had written that belongs only to them, all had scribes write is truth when it is NOT truth." David did not see God but he had his scribes write that he did. God did not give Abraham an oath, covenant, but Abraham had his scribes write that God did.
Jesus called Abraham a devil for lying about God because Abraham was never selected above other men by God. Being exalted was the egotistical desire of Abraham to trick people into believing he is above other men when he is no different than any other man except he proved himself as Evil by lying, stealing, dishonoring his wife, refusing to uphold his vows to God, being incestual, threatening war against peaceful people and demanding war without mercy to steal from people and enslaving the survivors. God never demanded human sacrifice but Abraham wanted his people to believe God did. Abraham did not care if his son burned alive as long as Abraham gets what Abraham wants and Abraham wanted his army to believe he serves God when Abraham did not. Human/animal sacrifice to a God is an evil, pagan ritual and the Living God never accepted any of them but men wanting power over people lied saying their God did.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Correct that Jesus is the Son of the Father, a unique creation unlike any other man on Earth.
Jesus is not "equal in nature" to God because only God is good. Jesus had the sin of wrath, anger when he caused physical harm to men in the temple when Jesus knew God commanded him to love even his enemies as beloved family. Jesus wanted to save their lives and had no intention of killing them but did not teach in the manner of mercy and kindness that God told Jesus to teach. That is a reason Jesus was required by God to show submission and repentance by being water baptized to make himself whole to enable God to forgive him for his unkind acts. What Jesus did is not a deadly sin but it was an offense to God, an act of disobedience.

You do not know that Jesus harmed anybody when He drove the sellers and money changers out of the Temple.
You do not know that He was angry when He did that.
If He was angry you seem to think that anger by itself is wrong.
You seem to think that Jesus was not good, that He was a sinner and so was not the sacrifice free from sin, the lamb without blemish, that could die for the sins of everyone instead of just dying for His own sins.
You seem to think that Jesus was a creation when the Bible teaches that Jesus was not brought into existence. (see John 1:2,3)
 

Brian2

Veteran Member

It is a bit hard to read your post 45. If you edit it so that it appears properly then I can answer it more easily.
 

Triumph

FREEDOM OF SPEECH
I have heard a number of explanations for what Thomas said to try to make it look as if Thomas was not saying to Jesus "My Lord and my God" and meaning it just as it sounds. So really I don't have to say anything about your explanation.



The disciples only started calling Jesus "Lord" after His resurrection. That is the context.
It is amazing that you think that when Thomas said "My Lord and my God" the term "my Lord" applies to Jesus but the term "My God" does not apply to Jesus.



Not all Lords were men in those days. I'm sure there were many Lord gods in other religions.
When did Jesus teach that no man is a God? Jesus did teach that the Jewish judges had been called gods (Ps 82, John 10:35)



The Old Testament does say that people saw God. How do you explain that seeming contradiction?

The contradiction that most people are blind to see is that the Jews worshipped a made by Abraham Lord God that Abraham invented out of his imagination to exalt himself to a throne by telling people they are God's people if they will accept Abraham has a covenant with Lord God so Abraham and his sons could rule as Lord God.
The true creator and Living God, Father of Jesus is not the Lord God the followers of Abraham worship. Those are 2 different Gods and only one is real. God is not Lord God.
Chapter 1 in the Bible presents the Living God, Father of Jesus, and God's outline of creation is finished with people alive for generations before the fake Lord God the Jews worship is presented in Genesis 2:4. Abraham invented his own God just like a Greek man invented Zeus to be his God. There is only one true God but most people do not worship Him even though they do believe they worship God. God is the God that created the humans named Abraham, Issaac and Jacob but Jacobs well has no eternal life in it because those men never worshiped the true God but did worship the fictional God Abraham had his scribes write is Lord God.
True religion did not come with Abraham and Moses because God is not a God of wrath and destruction. Men bring wrath and destruction as they serve fake wrathful Gods that only exist in their imaginations supported by traditions of wrathful, deceitful men. Those men died in their sins and are Dead. God is not a God of the dead but of the living that learn God is love and God is a Father that wants his children to not kill each other. God desires people to love one another with kindness and mercy working differences out by discussion with equality not on a battlefield. Righteousness is not determined by what ruler has the strongest killers.
True religion began on Earth with John the Baptist offering merciful sin removal that removes belief in animal and human sacrifice and Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Son of the Living God teaching the true words of God that offers eternal life.
 
Last edited:

Brian2

Veteran Member
The contradiction that most people are blind to see is that the Jews worshipped a made by Abraham Lord God that Abraham invented out of his imagination to exalt himself to a throne by telling people they are God's people if they will accept Abraham has a covenant with Lord God so Abraham and his sons could rule as Lord God.
The true creator and Living God, Father of Jesus is not the Lord God the followers of Abraham worship. Those are 2 different Gods and only one is real. God is not Lord God.
Chapter 1 in the Bible presents the Living God, Father of Jesus, and God's outline of creation is finished with people alive for generations before the fake Lord God the Jews worship is presented in Genesis 2:4. Abraham invented his own God just like a Greek man invented Zeus to be his God. There is only one true God but most people do not worship Him even though they do believe they worship God. God is the God that created the humans named Abraham, Issaac and Jacob but Jacobs well has no eternal life in it because those men never worshiped the true God but did worship the fictional God Abraham had his scribes write is Lord God.
True religion did not come with Abraham and Moses because God is not a God of wrath and destruction. Men bring wrath and destruction as they serve fake wrathful Gods that only exist in their imaginations supported by traditions of wrathful, deceitful men. Those men died in their sins and are Dead. God is not a God of the dead but of the living that learn God is love and God is a Father that wants his children to not kill each other. God desires people to love one another with kindness and mercy working differences out by discussion with equality not on a battlefield. Righteousness is not determined by what ruler has the strongest killers.
True religion began on Earth with John the Baptist offering merciful sin removal that removes belief in animal and human sacrifice and Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Son of the Living God teaching the true words of God that offers eternal life.

You seem to be saying things that the Bible does not teach, things that you have made up or that your teachers have made up about the Bible and Abraham and which parts of the Bible are acceptable.
Do you teach the Gospel of the Kingdom and that repentance and the ritual of baptism, without Jesus sacrifice, is enough for the forgiveness of our sins,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or one of those? Which parts of the Bible do you accept and/or reject?
 

Triumph

FREEDOM OF SPEECH
You seem to be saying things that the Bible does not teach, things that you have made up or that your teachers have made up about the Bible and Abraham and which parts of the Bible are acceptable.
Do you teach the Gospel of the Kingdom and that repentance and the ritual of baptism, without Jesus sacrifice, is enough for the forgiveness of our sins,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or one of those? Which parts of the Bible do you accept and/or reject?

Are the words of Jesus enough? Jesus said if you want to KILL HIM then you do not love God or Jesus. In John 8:37 Jesus said the people that DO NOT have the WORD OF GOD in them seek to kill Jesus. That means God is not accepting anyone that kills His beloved son or agrees with his murder for sins he did not commit. If people have Holy Spirit they do not agree with the death of Jesus because it is unmerciful and without love of Jesus or love of the Words of God that Jesus taught.
Want Jesus to die on a cross for sins he did not commit? Why do you not not believe Jesus?

John 8: 47He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

Jesus never said I am going to die to remove sin because his death had nothing to do with sin removal at all. Jesus was forced to make the decision to die to keep the Jews from continuing to kill his disciples and friends thus stop a local war over religion.
Only the liar Pharisee Paul claimed blood sacrifice removes sin even though Jesus taught against blood sacrifice for sin removal even whipping temple priests for doing it. It is highly probable that Pharisee Paul that calls himself the "Hebrew of Hebrews" and a "son of Abraham", was among the Pharisees that Jesus whipped and argued with in the temple.
The Lord God Paul worships is not the God that Jesus worships. God is true Justice and that is the guilty are punished for their actions and the innocent are set free.

Water Baptism is acceptable by God for forgiveness/repentance of sins and not the death of an innocent life. Blood sacrifices are inequity. God sent John the Baptist to stop people from believing in animal and human sacrifice because the true Living God never accepted any of them. Heathens/Pagans sacrifice humans to their Gods and it is a cruel, demonic ritual. Jesus was sent to the Hebrew/ Jews because they were LOST human sacrificers that were so cruel they dashed infants against rocks and burned innocent children alive and owned human slaves. Jews/Hebrews were allowed by their man made religious laws to beat their slaves to death, male or female. Hebrews claimed to be the people of God but were not as they served hundreds of man made religious laws said to be from God but were not. Jesus taught against slavery and against killing children ( thou shall not kill the innocent! ) and against blood sacrifices because none of those acts were ever acceptable to God. Seek Holy Spirit, the Words of God taught by Jesus, and see this is truth.
 
Last edited:

Gezellig

Member
So with continued revelation (new light) it did become clear that the use in the Bible of ruach and nephesh and pneuma and psyche extended beyond what the JWs would have us believe.
.
Our spirit knows our mind. The souls of martyrs are seen in heaven.
Our soul lives after our body is killed.
..

Let's assume this is so. Then what about Ecclesiastes 9:5, 6?
"The living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing...
their love, their hatred and passions have passed... ."
Then you can see verse 10.
Another similar verse in the 10th chapter is the second part of the 14th verse.
 
Last edited:
Top