Entropy increases with time. It is never zero
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
God discovered by Science
- Thread starter Sophiaa
- Start date
Entropy increases with time. It is never zero
Suave
Simulated character
Welcome to RF.
Pig brains have been kept alive for over 36 hours after the death of the pig's bodies. What if human brains could also be kept alive after the death of the bodies from where they were embodied? What if disembodied minds could be interfaced with power computers connecting disembodied minds to virtual reality worlds? Then who is to say each of us aren't one of these disembodied minds interfaced with a powerful computer by a controller simulating our realities, this being God.
I concur with Nick Bostrom's reasoning why we are very likely living in a simulated reality.
Bostrom argues that at least ONE of the following propositions must be true:
(1) The human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage.
(2) Any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof).
(3) We are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.
Since there is a significant chance that a future generation of technologically advanced post-humans will run ancestor-simulations by powerful computers, then we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.
Indications we might be living in a simulated reality:
1. A particle passing through a double-slit behaves as a wave causing an interference pattern when unobserved, but this same particle doesn't create an interference pattern when its path of travel can be determined by an observer. This collapse of the wave-function could be happening in order to save computational resources necessary for our simulated reality.
2. This mark of intelligence left in our genetic coding might be indicative of an intelligent designer, who may be responsible for the simulation of our reality. Our genetic code's creator has left this mathematical pattern in our genetic code conveying to me the symbol of an Egyptian triangle as well as the number 37 embedded in our genetic code.
Eight of the canonical amino acids can be sufficiently defined by the composition of their codon's first and second base nucleotides. The nucleon sum of these amino acids' side chains is 333 (=37 * 3 squared), the sun of their block nucleons (basic core structure) is 592 (=37 * 4 squared), and the sum of their total nucleons is 925 (=37 * 5 squared ). With 37 factored out, this results in 3 squared + 4 squared + 5 squared, which is representative of an Egyptian triangle.
I would not expect there to be a mathematical depiction of an Egyptian triangle stored within genetic coding if it were a naturally occurring phenomenon. The mathematical pattern of the number 37 being used as a key factor for conveying an Egyptian triangle might related to the gematria value of 37 appearing in the Hebrew language of Genesis 1:1.
3. Theoretical physicist Dr. S. James Gates Jr. claims that a certain string theory, super-symmetrical equations describing the nature and reality of our universe, contains embedded computer codes; these codes have digital data in the form of 0's and 1's identical to what makes web browsers function, and they're error-correct codes.
In conclusion, with the wave-function collapsing in order to conserve computational power of a simulator device, a semantic message in genetic coding, and the computer coding found buried deep within the mathematical equations of super symmetry., seems to me like we are living in a simulation.
Last edited:
setarcos
The hopeful or the hopeless?
By what method do we calculate the potential energy of quantum indeterminacy? If you cannot calculate its potential you cannot calculate a net capacity of zero energy. Prier to the collapse of the field. The particles are not emanating from nothing. They are emanating from something. Something already existent. How then do we calculate the properties of violation of the 1st Law?
Azrael Antilla
Active Member
They are emanating from the fabric of spacetime itself.
Suave
Simulated character
Controller of sims, reality based virtual reality programmer of human consciousness; I just don't know who or what is beyond the simulation.
We Never Know
No Slack
"Energy doesn't talk and give dictations"
One wouldn't think chemical reactions would either yet here we are chatting using energy from those chemical reactions.
Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
"Energy doesn't talk and give dictations"
One wouldn't think chemical reactions would either yet here we are chatting using energy from those chemical reactions.
It wrote the ten commandments and told Jesus to due for people or be doomed?
I know some religions experience energy and use it for say healing but, really, now.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Or perhaps it is you that has no understanding of energy. I think that appears to be the most liklely.
Anyone that tries to attach woo woo to energy does not appear to understand it at all.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That looks like it might be a bunch of word salad. By the way, when I was speaking of "nothing" I was speaking of a case of "zero energy". The actual concept of "nothing" may be impossible in our universe.
Well if science ever discovers God expect it to be a great moment.
"Energy doesn't talk and give dictations"
One wouldn't think chemical reactions would either yet here we are chatting using energy from those chemical reactions.
And quantum dots
We Never Know
No Slack
Experimental proof for the observable universe being a "zero-energy universe" is currently inconclusive. Gravitational energy from visible matter accounts for 26–37% of the observed total mass-energy density.[14] Therefore to fit the concept of a "zero-energy universe" to the observed universe, other negative energy reservoirs besides gravity from baryonic matter are necessary. These reservoirs are frequently assumed to be dark matter.
setarcos
The hopeful or the hopeless?
Entropy, when it "moves" from its current position to its future determination generally goes from less entropy to more in a closed system.
However in an open system entropy can decrease within that system. That is when a net increase in energy is applied to that system. That is how we create new stuff like cars and tv's etc. We increase entropy in one system in order to decrease entropy in another. One can see however that a general increase in entropy in our universe will eventually reach a point at which it is at its maximum. That is a point at which energy has reached its maximum dissemination an no further work is possible. In an open system the amount of entropy increase can be countered exactly by an equal amount of energy input resulting in a net work increase of zero. What I meant...a net increase of entropy in the system of zero.
We Never Know
No Slack
I will have to read a bit on them.
setarcos
The hopeful or the hopeless?
No, the particles may effect space/time by their existent properties but they are not emanating from space/time itself. They simply hold their existence within it.
We Never Know
No Slack
Look at all that are energy from chemical reactions has done.
So you think the universe is an open system? I guess you best let the physicists and cosmologists at cern and the perimeter institute. I see a nobel prize for your insight.
BTW. There ain't no such thing as a free ride, over time cars and tv succumb to entopy just like everything else
Hint... semiconductors
We Never Know
No Slack
When people speak of "the universe" they need to keep in mind we only know around 4%(if that) of the universe. The other 96% we can't see, detect or even comprehend, IOW its unknown.
We Never Know
No Slack
Nanotechnology