Kooky
Freedom from Sanity
Where "ideal" is to be taken as the opposite of "real", yes.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Should The Far Right and Right Wing Media Follow Their Own Demands?
- Thread starter sun rise
- Start date
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Hypocrisy is hypocrisy no matter which side does it, but the Pubs seem hell-bent to have a monopoly on it.
Again, if the results of the election were supposedly fraudulent, then why is it that all those Pubs that won won't declare that their results should be audited? I don't see any of the Dems who lost saying they should be.
Therefore, what you post above falls into the "false equivalency" category.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Well of course. I would expect no less of that catch phrase out of you.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
With the above and some other recent comments of yours, I've finally concluded that there is no reason for me to even try and have a serious conversation with you.
So, ...
Kooky
Freedom from Sanity
The difference being that only one "side" has been demonstrated to commit voter fraud and violent action against elected officials.
You may find comfort in the belief that "both sides are bad" so you don't need to apply scrutiny to the people you vote for, but that comfort is not based on available facts.