PureX
Veteran Member
If we're calling that a solution.Sounds like they already found a market solution, then.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If we're calling that a solution.Sounds like they already found a market solution, then.
Admittedly, American political discourse does often look like a caricature of itself from the outside.
Ah, but even if they own their own tractors they are facing AB5 bill depending of the courts.I doubt it. Independents own their own highway
tractors, & often the trailers. This really makes
them a business...not an employee.
You fail to understand who controls interstate regulations....I thought that in America, the government doing stuff to solve problems was "socialism"?
Shouldn't the Market (PBUH) solve all these problems by itself?
Why is that a problem that the free market (PBUI) cannot fix? Shouldn't all of this be trivially solvable with the ingenuity of spirited entrepreneurs with a go getter attitude who would rather work productively rather than whine ineffectually about a problem they could change instead?You fail to understand who controls interstate regulations....
A State can issue CDL licenses to those 18 and over but once they cross a State line federal government rules come into play.
See the Mann Act
You really don't understand do you....Why is that a problem that the free market (PBUI) cannot fix? Shouldn't all of this be trivially solvable with the ingenuity of spirited entrepreneurs with a go getter attitude who would rather work productively rather than whine ineffectually about a problem they could change instead?
Why is that a problem that the free market (PBUI) cannot fix? Shouldn't all of this be trivially solvable with the ingenuity of spirited entrepreneurs with a go getter attitude who would rather work productively rather than whine ineffectually about a problem they could change instead?
Link fails me.Ah, but even if they own their own tractors they are facing AB5 bill depending of the courts.
https://www.joc.com/trucking-logistics/drayage/la–lb-drayage-operators-adapt-ab5-threat_20191231.html
Bad idea. Really bad idea.Drivers with a CDL and are undered the age of 21 can not drive interstate , but can drive the length of CA and TX, to name a few states.
Supposedly, the federal government has known for months that one of the major issues in the supply line is the lack of truck drivers. So, riddle me this why hasn't the Dept of Transportation done something about it? Is it because the Secretary of Transportation has been on maturnity leave for the past 8 weeeks and hasn't brought this problem up or maybe the supply chain problem hadn't reached the critical political point.
At least there is now a bill in the Senate, thanks to Senator Deb Fischer, that would remedy this problem.
Bill Would Allow Interstate Trucking Licenses For 18 Year Olds - Lowest Price Traffic School Laws & Leadership Blog
That makes Hypocrisy a wonderful solution.Sounds like they already found a market solution, then.
AB5 was before Prop22, and that effectively did away with AB5.Ah, but even if they own their own tractors they are facing AB5 bill depending of the courts.
https://www.joc.com/trucking-logistics/drayage/la–lb-drayage-operators-adapt-ab5-threat_20191231.html
So you are saying that those between 18 and 21 do not have any experience on the road?I think drivers should have more experience on the roads so something so big isn't a first experience on the road.
Guess you should do a little homework before making statements.AB5 was before Prop22, and that effectively did away with AB5.
Generally not much, if any at all.So you are saying that those between 18 and 21 do not have any experience on the road?
Except AB5 has basically changed nothing, including the independent contractor thing, and things are functioning under Prop22.This ruling will probably go all the way to the CA Supreme Court and possibly the SCOTUS but AB5 is still a law in CA.
Prop22 was found to be unconstitutional as per CA constitution. Hence there is NO Prop22 in affect.Generally not much, if any at all.
Except AB5 has basically changed nothing, including the independent contractor thing, and things are functioning under Prop22.
I preferred being a contractor.Prop22 was found to be unconstitutional as per CA constitution. Hence there is NO Prop22 in affect.
The Battle Continues: Prop 22 Struck Down, AB 5 Appealed | JD Supra
And your idea that independent contractor "thing"(whatever you mean by that) are functioning is wrong.
Obvously you disagree with the following links:
Gig Workers Fight California’s New Contractor Law
https://www.atr.org/ab5
I live and work in California as an independent contractor. Prop 22 is in effect, it is what operations are functioning under. AB5 made us employees. Prop 22 keeps it as independent contractors. I am am independent contractor amd working under Prop 22 laws.Prop22 was found to be unconstitutional as per CA constitution. Hence there is NO Prop22 in affect.
The Battle Continues: Prop 22 Struck Down, AB 5 Appealed | JD Supra
And your idea that independent contractor "thing"(whatever you mean by that) are functioning is wrong.
Obvously you disagree with the following links:
Gig Workers Fight California’s New Contractor Law
https://www.atr.org/ab5
So you disagree with the article:I live and work in California as an independent contractor. Prop 22 is in effect, it is what operations are functioning under. AB5 made us employees. Prop 22 keeps it as independent contractors. I am am independent contractor amd working under Prop 22 laws.