Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Like if a teacher asks a class why the Holocaust was bad and one kid says "Because it killed innocent people for no reason.", but then another kid says "But my dad says the Jews are out to take over the world and we need to finish what the Nazis started." So, healthy discussion?
I just said talking about horrific events in an education environment and even encouraging opposing views (whether one agrees or not since it's about education not political correctness) is healthy.
You brought up how efficient the Germans were at doing the Holocaust, and I asked you numerous times how it was efficient, but you avoided answering me. I'm still curious what students could learn about efficiency using the example of the Holocaust, so what were your thoughts on that? You mentioned it quite a few times, so it wasn't a one time mistake.
I didn't mention Germans, nor used that word.
I was going by the OP.
They talk about Holocaust, WW1, and so forth in classrooms all the time. I'm not sure if they have open discussion about it.
Like I said, open discussion without being reprimanded for opinions in an education environment shows that students can voice their opinions without political correctness. Discussing various opinions opposing and not isn't against the law and if they decide to have it in the classroom make an opt out option like they do with abortion topics and sex education.
I don't entertain thoughts on genocide in the Holocaust. My point was just in general. Professors don't need to focus on genocide as the topic of discussion (age depending). Opposing views doesn't mean opposing views to genocide.