• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why did God create homosexuality?

DNB

Christian
Here you have made a judgment that clearly demonstrates your complete misunderstanding of a homosexual union, wrongly assuming that is is not a relationship of mutual love.
Here you have showed a lack of wisdom by not being able to equate an act with an intent. Bastardizing God's creation by creating a union between two incompatible and antithetical, physiologies and organs, shows contempt for one's maker.
Don't assume there's love, just because there's sex or a relation. That's an extremely naive and insidious remark.
 
Last edited:

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
The only reason that my sentiments may hurt someone, is because there are these constant bleeding-hearts like yourself, that just cannot accept a moral accusation. You construe my views as bigoted or homophobic. Like I said, I'm just as guilty, but admit it.

God's austerity under the Old Covenant, was meant to illustrate the egregious nature opf sin and how desensitized that we have become in, first, discerning it, and secondly, denouncing it. Once that this has been established, i.e. our awareness has been enlightened, God is prepared to be merciful if we repent and refrain from these insidious behaviours - Jesus died for our sins.

Hurt as in get in verbal abuse, killed, indoctrinated, where people loose their sense of self, or forced to act/be a certain way when they are inherently not.... that's different than just getting defensive over an opinion and wake up fine the next morning.

I know all that. Just saying god killed people for sexual perversion. Homosexuality and homosexuals are irrelevant in this.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I said 'engage', not invite in my home.
...I have been overly Christ-like in this conversation. Suffering the incessant and exasperating remarks by you and your cohorts, who prefer to debate over semantics rather than principle and fundamentals - penises were made for vaginas, and men should not dress like woman.

It's literally not semantics. Homosexuality in the 21st century (even 20th century) is not the biblical definition.

If you want to talk about that word you'd have to use the actual definition. If you want to talk about the morality of same-sex sex, use that. Homosexuality is no longer seen as a disorder, mental illness, or illegal. I don't see it that way and I do know quite a few christians that don't see it that way thank goodness (speaking of those who use the term homosexuality correctly).
 

DNB

Christian
Hurt as in get in verbal abuse, killed, indoctrinated, where people loose their sense of self, or forced to act/be a certain way when they are inherently not.... that's different than just getting defensive over an opinion and wake up fine the next morning.

I know all that. Just saying god killed people for sexual perversion. Homosexuality and homosexuals are irrelevant in this.
I agree with God's decision to kill all those that He deemed worthy of death. Every single one of us deserve to die immediately, and flippin' yes, including myself.
I do not love my neighbour as I ought to, I do not love God as I ought to, I don't appreciate Jesus as I ought to, I am a worthless, flippin' scoundrel - I am in dire need of a saviour. I am a sick pervert who cannot walk down the street without looking at a woman with lascivious and inappropriate eyes, in the wrong areas of her body. Do you think that I feel that I am better than anyone else on this forum, or whosever's actions that I denounce?

My vehemence and indignation stems from the fact that people like you keep calling sinful actions as harmless and inconsequential. You promote sick behaviour. You probably even think that you're a pretty good person.
 

DNB

Christian
Actually, no. One because homosexuality (hetero/bisexual) only refers to the sex of both parties and two, I can't endorse someone to not be themselves and how they were born. It's doesn't make sense.
In your avatar you look like you're about 3 years old, how did you gain such a vocabulary in such a short period of time? Are you older than you look?
 

DNB

Christian
It's literally not semantics. Homosexuality in the 21st century (even 20th century) is not the biblical definition.

If you want to talk about that word you'd have to use the actual definition. If you want to talk about the morality of same-sex sex, use that. Homosexuality is no longer seen as a disorder, mental illness, or illegal. I don't see it that way and I do know quite a few christians that don't see it that way thank goodness (speaking of those who use the term homosexuality correctly).
So you believe that rocks have a spirit?
 

DNB

Christian
In other words @DNB the words you use determine the nature of the conversation. I'm sure you don't live in the 1900th century when talking about anything scientific and medical related topics, no?
I don't think that there has been a 1900th century, ...nor will there be (just my opinion)
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
The human owned medical no argument biology.

An adult human man. An adult human woman. Have sex to reproduce human life.

Holy human baby. Healthy babies firstborn babies. Firstborn of human always innocent no matter what environmental changes of God occur.

The relativity teaching.

Two of bodies said of any species. Is natural balanced life. Continuance of life is the topic subject.

No argument as it is medical correct.

No relationship of that mutual natural pairing human life is defined as one human theme just one self one consciousness with no stated sexuality.

Science knew it said we won't go on. We will die out.

No says the homosexuals we surrogate babies. Is not a correct balanced human answer.

As we are given signs first. Then the bio form can change into a non reproductive human type body.

Changes to the human life was why it was challenged. Reality notified women began to be unable to conceive also. Another corresponding sign.

Then past skeletal bodies prove human DNA biology can deform into cellular dysfunction.

So who theories one only by intent?

Science does.

Science does not theory for sexual variations.

Was why the bible was written against nuclear maths occult theists and irradiation bio chemistry causes.

It was a medical status that said should not be occurring it is not natural.

Human psychic consciousness seems to verify what our bodies notify us of. That hierarchy seemed to own and want human population removal.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
So you believe that rocks have a spirit?
The human biology notified DNA bio chemistry mind change into homosexual expressions a cause said being stoned was due to irradiation of stones radiation falling out of the heavens.

Never God owned was an occult nuclear human science cause. Genesis DNA leaving exiting as an exodus of the ground baring or denoted as becoming naked.

Losing water and spirit fused coverage.

Humans eviction from the earth garden.

By occult nuclear dust of stone conversions.

Dusts already owned by sun cause a huge irradiation separation into a particle. God earth once owning a higher earth God crystalline fusion we taught was Atlantis fusion.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Nope, you made a bunch of false accusations that I ignored.

Just tell me when you are ready to admit when you are wrong.
You said it was too long to read. How can you know it was false if you did not read it?
If you think that any of what I said is false then why not explain why you think it is false?

Wrong about what? I am not wrong when I say you do not answer my questions because that is a provable fact. I might be wrong about why you do not answer them, but I cannot know why you do not answer them unless you tell me. If you ignore my questions and change the subject that is called deflecting.

I am not going to admit I am wrong unless I have been proven wrong. If you tell me why you cannot answer my questions other than not wanting to get egg on your face then I will admit I was wrong. To say my questions are silly is not an answer.

There can be no discussion when one person won't even communicate, when all the expect from the other person is admitting they are wrong. That is not a discussion.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
When science in espionage is a bunch of humans who aren't living anyone elses human experience. Yet by man advice gets and wants their human family answers.

Not their own experience as one self or even the group.

Also wants their human experiences as that one self as the other one human they don't own.

That is when family realise how evil you are. By choice and themes.

Aren't you researching human consciousness which has been a collective advice of billions upon billions of one human selves?

And dont you want it to be just AI for machine themes claiming as I now own by his man detail God Christ and his consciousness. Energies.

Claiming not any human family in a life lived want as natural expressions in reality but any type of particle in energy you can exploit?

As the reasons for non stop interviews.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
That is a scripture you'll see often to argue about marriage related issues. Its over used and is taken out of context often. The bit there is talking about problem the Corinthians are having during some kind of distressful time, and Paul is talking about a compromise under strange conditions. I can't say anything about extra-canonical resources on Paul such as scholars but generally this verse is the only one in which Paul doubts the importance of marriage. Other church fathers though very much oppose marriage if you can stand to be single, but I am operating under the assumption that Paul predates them and is not influenced by writers such as Jerome. Jerome is very anti-sex. He absolutely believes people should never have sex if we can avoid it, but he's not in the canon. I will continue to believe Paul is pro-marriage.

It says Paul was not married. He is asking others to be like him if they can. pretty explicit.

Whom are we counting as scholars? Am I a scholar, too?

I dont know who you are.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
LOL! Oh my! A classic attempt to shift the burden of proof.
I have no burden of proof since I am not trying to prove anything to anyone.
I am sorry but you have it backwards. You have no reliable evidence for your beliefs. I do not need evidence when no reliable evidence has been presented.
The evidence has been presented dozens of times. Whether YOU consider it reliable or not is a moot point. Evidence is evidence.
The null hypothesis is disbelief.
I have no problem with your disbelief so why do you have a problem with my belief?
You are not going to prove that my belief is false with a personal opinion so why continue telling me I am wrong?
And you are misusing logical fallacies. The fact that many people have explained to your is not an argumentum ad populum.
It is an argumentum ad populum when you say many people have told me I am wrong so it must be true that I am wrong. You now have a chance to wiggle out of this if you say that those many people are not necessarily correct about me being wrong.
You have been wrong. Terribly wrong. We are not debating that. We are discussing how you can have a reasoned discussion with others.
You have not proven that I am wrong or terribly wrong so that is just a personal opinion, an egotistical bald assertion. Show me some proof that I am wrong and then we will have something to discuss.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
WWJD? For those trying to be like Jesus - seems like they would also dedicate their life to ministry and trying to serve others, rather than getting married and having kids?
Some Christians do just that, but it is not expected of everyone.
 
Top