Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Does it though? I can't help but feel that items like "Soros" and "McAuliffe" require a bit of investigation to parties unfamiliar with them. Not to mention that this title gives absolutely no indication of why the father of the girl was being sought after for jail time. If anything... this is a super vague title that requires a lot of digging to fully understand.Title says it all.
Title says it all.
Actually, No. It really doesn't.
From what I can gather a judge attempted to prosecute someone who had tried to report a sexual assault committed by a trans-person against their daughter in a bathroom. This is obviously an abuse of power and, assuming it is the case, the judge should be removed.
The article claims this judge is "linked" to two people because they donated money to their campaign to become judge, with the implication that somehow makes them responsible for the judges conduct. One of them, Terry McAuliffe has a relationship with the Clintons. And the other, George Soros is a wealthy Jewish financier.
So what I believe you are inferring- and I hope I'm mistaken- is that wealthy jews and far left radicals are engaged in a conspiracy to enforce what conservatives regard as sexual perversions on to the country, by funding a judge who abuses their power to cover-up sexual assault allegations to further the trans-rights agenda. This comes all with the implication that it was intentional for the outset and Soros and McAuliffe are guilty of the abuse of power by association rather than evidence of co-ordinated activity with this judge.
Have I understood this correctly?