• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is There a Trinity in the TaNaKh? Things that make me go "hmmm"

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
KJV:
Gen 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;

Jonathon Targum:

And the Word of the Lord had caused showers of favour to descend upon Sedom and Amorah, to the intent that they might work repentance, but they did it not: so that they said, Wickedness is not manifest before the Lord. Behold, then, there are now sent down upon them sulphur and fire from before the Word of the Lord from Heaven.

Orthodox Jewish Bible Bershis 19:24 Then Hashem rained upon Sodom and upon Amora gofrit and eish from Hashem out of Shomayim;

It would appear that there are two of which the Jonathon Targum called the second - The Word.

Maybe it wasn't so strange for Jewish John to say:

ESV John 1: 18 No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.

God, who is at the Father's side made God known.

Of course, some may disagree... but it makes me go.. "hmmm."

A Jewish author Segal talked about the "Two Powers in Heaven" = He admits to that the Jews believed it in times past.
 
Last edited:

RabbiO

הרב יונה בן זכריה
I can't think of any reason why you would choose to cite to the Orthodox Jewish Bible or quote from it. You do know, I assume, that no Orthodox, modern, Haredi, or Chasidic, no Conservative, no Masorti, no Liberal, no Reform, no Reconstructionist, no Renewal, no Humanist Jew considers the Orthodox Jewish Bible to be either Orthodox or Jewish.

Did you have a reason for doing so?
 
Last edited:

Harel13

Am Yisrael Chai
Staff member
Premium Member
KJV:
Gen 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;

Jonathon Targum:

And the Word of the Lord had caused showers of favour to descend upon Sedom and Amorah, to the intent that they might work repentance, but they did it not: so that they said, Wickedness is not manifest before the Lord. Behold, then, there are now sent down upon them sulphur and fire from before the Word of the Lord from Heaven.

Orthodox Jewish Bible Bershis 19:24 Then Hashem rained upon Sodom and upon Amora gofrit and eish from Hashem out of Shomayim;

It would appear that there are two of which the Jonathon Targum called the second - The Word.

Maybe it wasn't so strange for Jewish John to say:

ESV John 1: 18 No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.

God, who is at the Father's side made God known.

Of course, some may disagree... but it makes me go.. "hmmm."

A Jewish author Segal talked about the "Two Powers in Heaven" = He admits to that the Jews believed it in times past.

Hi @KenS. I'd like to point out a few things. First, as @RabbiO rightly noted, "the Orthodox Jewish Bible" has little to actually do with Orthodox Judaism or Judaism in general. It was made by a Messianic Jew named Philip Goble, and like other pieces of Messianic literature, is an attempt to disguise Christianity within a Jewishy framework in order to convince Jews to convert.

The second point is that as you might have noticed, the Targum Jonathan on the Pentateuch is filled with added midrashic interpretations, which are generally not to be taken at face value. Even academic scholars agree that its author or authors are not to be identified with the author of the much, much older Targum Jonathan on the Prophets. Hence, it is typically called "Pseudo-Jonathan" because there was a time in which it was attributed to the original Jonathan ben Uziel (author of the targum on the Prophets), though that has long not been the case.

Another important thing to note is that oftentimes, when the language of the Tanach used expressions that seemed to add a physical dimension to God, the various classic Targums (Onkelus, Jonathan, Pseudo-Jonathan, Neofiti and Yerushalmi) preferred to ditch literal translations and instead incorporated phrases that made the reader understand that the God was not a physical entity.

This is exactly what is going on here: The verse appears to suggest that God hurtled fire and brimstone down at Sodom and Gomorrah, making it seem as though God has hands. This is of course simply how the Hebrew language works, however there are some people who might get the wrong idea nonetheless. The Targum comes to dispel that notion by saying that it was "the word of the LORD" that did this. What is this word? In other places, the phrase "על פי ה'" (by the mouth of the LORD) is also translated as "by the word of the LORD". From here we understand that what happened to Sodom and the rest was simply due to a vocal command of God.
Then the Targum continues with a midrashic interpretation for the rest of the verse. When it says, later on, "Wickedness is not manifest before the Lord", there is no need to use the alternative "the word of the LORD" because wickedness is an abstract concept, so no physical images come to mind.

The last point I want to make is that Alan Segal was probably not a religious Jew. According to Wikipedia, he had described himself as a "humanist", so I have currently no reason to believe he was a theist in any form (yes, despite him also describing himself as a "believing Jew". I do not know how one can be both a believer, a Jew and a humanist. They don't all go together). I have not read his book "Two Powers in Heaven", but he is by no means the only Jewish person who has attempted to push theories on ancient Judaism having been polytheistic in some such form or shape. Typically I have found the arguments to be based on a load of assumptions and not fully substantiated. You are, of course, free to accept his theories, though I personally would not use the phrase "He admits to that the Jews believed it in times past" as though he had revealed some big secret that Jews have kept hidden from the world for thousands of years. He, and others, have not. They present theories, some better-developed and some less-so, but theories nonetheless.

Edit: Undoubtedly, there were gnostic Jews in ancient times who held polytheistic views about divinity. But they were the small minority. The "big cheese" exponent of the view in the Talmudic era seems to have been the heretic Elisha ben Avoyah, a former rabbi who went astray (OTD as we modern Jews call it) after studying deep Jewish mysticism when he was not spiritually prepared for it. His deeper studies culminated in a conclusion similar to Marcionism: Two divine entities, one having created the other. Human interactions with the divine have always been with the latter. I won't get into the story too much. I just think it's interesting that at the time, nobody who maintained the mainstream Jewish lifestyle and worldview could also be an exponent of any form of multi-tarianism. The small Jewish sects that had this view were not what we would call Orthodox, and Elisha ben Abuya became a Hellenist (desecrated Shabbat, etc). Some might conclude that this was due to the strong arm of "the rabbis". I, on the other hand, conclude that the two are simply incompatible, and that this has always been the case.
 
Last edited:

74x12

Well-Known Member
KJV:
Gen 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;

Jonathon Targum:

And the Word of the Lord had caused showers of favour to descend upon Sedom and Amorah, to the intent that they might work repentance, but they did it not: so that they said, Wickedness is not manifest before the Lord. Behold, then, there are now sent down upon them sulphur and fire from before the Word of the Lord from Heaven.

Orthodox Jewish Bible Bershis 19:24 Then Hashem rained upon Sodom and upon Amora gofrit and eish from Hashem out of Shomayim;

It would appear that there are two of which the Jonathon Targum called the second - The Word.

Maybe it wasn't so strange for Jewish John to say:

ESV John 1: 18 No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.

God, who is at the Father's side made God known.

Of course, some may disagree... but it makes me go.. "hmmm."

A Jewish author Segal talked about the "Two Powers in Heaven" = He admits to that the Jews believed it in times past.
But according to what codex does John say this?

Even Ignatius(who knew Paul) in his day debated with people who had corrupted versions of the epistles that they had taken words out of. And he tried to tell them that such and such was written; but they said "it's not in here." So he said they had corrupted (altered) versions of the epistles. So apparently people started altering the epistles of Paul and other apostles right away. They probably didn't even wait for the apostles to die before they started altering these writings for their own liking. It's because Word of God is sharper than any two edged sword; so many people can't stand it. They have to change it to fit their own desires because they really aren't his sheep as he said they don't know his voice.

I believe it should say the only begotten Son of God rather than the God who is at the Father's side. That's the textus receptus so I stick with it. Finding new manuscripts is all well and good; but maybe they were rejected for a good reason. Many people believe that because it's the oldest manuscript we've found; therefore it must be right; but that's not necessarily true. It was probably rejected for a legitimate reason and they copied another version that was more trustworthy. Which version has since vanished but at least we have the copy. The textus receptus is the most cherished through the ages and even untold numbers of martyrs died to preserve it. IMO their blood has made it more beautiful. If it was good enough for them then it's good enough for me.

  • The Latin version agreed with only begotten
  • The Greek version agreed with only begotten
  • Even the Aramaic new Testament says only begotten

I'm opposed to all these alterations from new documents they dig up from some ancient trash heap somewhere. The fact they get these from trash heaps and what not other places of questionable character doesn't speak well for them in my opinion.

Having another god next to the one God the Father (1 Cor 8:6) doesn't make sense when compared to the rest of the scriptures. Jesus is indeed God but one with the Father. Having a separate god next to God is not even the trinity doctrine; it's crossed the line into tritheism. I'm Oneness but I've debated enough trinitarians to know where they stand. They tell me God's nature is a mystery but that you can't go to far or you're tritheist on one hand and oneness on the other.

Well I'm happy to "go to far" (their opinion) and be oneness but still I respect their desire not to be tritheist on the other hand. :p
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
I can't think of any reason why you would choose to cite to the Orthodox Jewish Bible or quote from it. You do know, I assume, that no Orthodox, modern, Haredi, or Chasidic, no Conservative, no Masorti, no Liberal, no Reform, no Reconstructionist, no Renewal, no Humanist Jew considers the Orthodox Jewish Bible to be either Orthodox or Jewish.

Did you have a reason for doing so?
Not really... I use a variety of translations for consideration. Is there one that you suggest I look at? Would be interested.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
The second point is that as you might have noticed, the Targum Jonathan on the Pentateuch is filled with added midrashic interpretations, which are generally not to be taken at face value. Even academic scholars agree that its author or authors are not to be identified with the author of the much, much older Targum Jonathan on the Prophets. Hence, it is typically called "Pseudo-Jonathan" because there was a time in which it was attributed to the original Jonathan ben Uziel (author of the targum on the Prophets), though that has long not been the case.

A

Is there one that you would suggest?
 

Harel13

Am Yisrael Chai
Staff member
Premium Member
what doesn't have a misdrashic interpretation...
Oh, a targum? Onkelus is more straightforward, but as I said, the targums make sure that one doesn't think that God is physical, and that's the case also with Onkelus.
Additional question... Isn't the Talmud all about interpretation?
Essentially, yes.
 

DNB

Christian
KJV:
Gen 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;

Jonathon Targum:

And the Word of the Lord had caused showers of favour to descend upon Sedom and Amorah, to the intent that they might work repentance, but they did it not: so that they said, Wickedness is not manifest before the Lord. Behold, then, there are now sent down upon them sulphur and fire from before the Word of the Lord from Heaven.

Orthodox Jewish Bible Bershis 19:24 Then Hashem rained upon Sodom and upon Amora gofrit and eish from Hashem out of Shomayim;

It would appear that there are two of which the Jonathon Targum called the second - The Word.

Maybe it wasn't so strange for Jewish John to say:

ESV John 1: 18 No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.

God, who is at the Father's side made God known.

Of course, some may disagree... but it makes me go.. "hmmm."

A Jewish author Segal talked about the "Two Powers in Heaven" = He admits to that the Jews believed it in times past.
Hi Ken, no, the substantiations that you put forth are extreme exceptions, they, hermeneutically speaking, do not qualify as grounds to establish doctrine. In all the doxologies throughout the TaNaKh, of all the psalms, prayers and prophecies, written or spoken by the most prominent and eminent men in Scripture, you will be extremely hard pressed to find more than five passages that appear to support your premise. And not one will be didactic nor explicit.

Fundamentally speaking, there cannot be, either functionally or intrinsically, more than one omnipresent, omniscient or omnipotent being in the universe. For, to ascribe such attributes to one, necessitates that there be no other, not without confusion, indistinction or redundancy.

Hear oh Israel, the Lord your God is one. And, before me there are no others - can two entities make such declarations?
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Hi Ken, no, the substantiations that you put forth are extreme exceptions, they, hermeneutically speaking, do not qualify as grounds to establish doctrine. In all the doxologies throughout the TaNaKh, of all the psalms, prayers and prophecies, written or spoken by the most prominent and eminent men in Scripture, you will be extremely hard pressed to find more than five passages that appear to support your premise. And not one will be didactic nor explicit.

Fundamentally speaking, there cannot be, either functionally or intrinsically, more than one omnipresent, omniscient or omnipotent being in the universe. For, to ascribe such attributes to one, necessitates that there be no other, not without confusion, indistinction or redundancy.

Hear oh Israel, the Lord your God is one. And, before me there are no others - can two entities make such declarations?

I don't pretend to understand completely what God can and cannot do or how He can manifest Himself. Within the context of Christian thought, there is just so much that can make one go to a "hmmm.."

Take for example:

Ex 3:2 There the angel of the LORD appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on fire it did not burn up.
3 So Moses thought, “I will go over and see this strange sight—why the bush does not burn up.”
4 When the LORD saw that he had gone over to look, God called to him from within the bush, “Moses! Moses!” And Moses said, “Here I am.”

Here we have the angel of the Lord that appeared to Moses and yet the one who spoke was the LORD Himself. A duality of power, it gives the sense of.

Interestingly enough God said "take of your sandals for the place you stand is holy" (paraphrased) - the very same words that were spoken to Joshua to which I assume is the same personage.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
The last point I want to make is that Alan Segal was probably not a religious Jew.

That is true... but what I am saying is that he dealt with the fact that religious Jews did put the thought forward in times past.
 

Harel13

Am Yisrael Chai
Staff member
Premium Member
That is true... but what I am saying is that he dealt with the fact that religious Jews did put the thought forward in times past.
Oh, okay. It seemed like you were saying: Oh look, there's even a religious Jew who backs me up on this. I understand now.
 

moorea944

Well-Known Member
I don't pretend to understand completely what God can and cannot do or how He can manifest Himself. Within the context of Christian thought, there is just so much that can make one go to a "hmmm.."

Take for example:

Ex 3:2 There the angel of the LORD appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on fire it did not burn up.
3 So Moses thought, “I will go over and see this strange sight—why the bush does not burn up.”
4 When the LORD saw that he had gone over to look, God called to him from within the bush, “Moses! Moses!” And Moses said, “Here I am.”

Here we have the angel of the Lord that appeared to Moses and yet the one who spoke was the LORD Himself. A duality of power, it gives the sense of.

Interestingly enough God said "take of your sandals for the place you stand is holy" (paraphrased) - the very same words that were spoken to Joshua to which I assume is the same personage.

Well, the one who spoke was the angel. God was speaking through the angel. God manifestation. God revealing himself in people. We see that God worked with many people. Esp, Jesus. Also in the wilderness, God told Moses that there would be his angel there to watch over them. "My name is in him"...... The angel was also given the power to forgive their sins. Same with the apostles, they were eventually.... given that power too.

2 Cor 5 God was in Christ reconciling the world back to him. So we see that God was working through his son here to bring mankind back to God.
And how are we reconciled back to God, it is by Jesus's death. (Rom 5)
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
KJV:
Gen 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;

Jonathon Targum:

And the Word of the Lord had caused showers of favour to descend upon Sedom and Amorah, to the intent that they might work repentance, but they did it not: so that they said, Wickedness is not manifest before the Lord. Behold, then, there are now sent down upon them sulphur and fire from before the Word of the Lord from Heaven.

Orthodox Jewish Bible Bershis 19:24 Then Hashem rained upon Sodom and upon Amora gofrit and eish from Hashem out of Shomayim;

It would appear that there are two of which the Jonathon Targum called the second - The Word.

Maybe it wasn't so strange for Jewish John to say:

ESV John 1: 18 No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.

God, who is at the Father's side made God known.

Of course, some may disagree... but it makes me go.. "hmmm."

A Jewish author Segal talked about the "Two Powers in Heaven" = He admits to that the Jews believed it in times past.
The Tanakh refers to "God's Spirit", so... :praying: & :heart:.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
The Tanakh refers to "God's Spirit", so... :praying: & :heart:.
That is a great point.

I am reminded of Joel 2:28 And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions:

It gives a hue of a portion of God... if not part of God. A third manifestation?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
It gives a hue of a portion of God... if not part of God. A third manifestation?
And I think it may show somethig else that I posted not too long ago, namely what about people who lived before Jesus, before Christianity, before Judaism, or in other areas untouched by them? As time has gone on, I more and mofre tend to believe that "God's Spirit" drives the quest for seeking God or Gods.

I personally don't posit that all religions are equal, but it has led me to accept all who seek God(s) as probably barking up the right tree. There's even room for agnostics using this approach because "I don't know" is a legitmate belief all of us likely have had at one time or another, and it's still natural, and actually good to a point, to question. Jesus reconized this when talking with Thomas and the Others.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Proof that even a blind chicken gets a worm once in a while.
Did I tell you my son-in-law's last name (and now the last name of my daughter) is Chicken? I will tell you what, that name flies!
 
Top