DNB
Christian
Are you trying to be oblivious?What is unconventional is the frankly weird interest you are taking in what other men do in bed.
My concern is the promotion of acts that lead to destruction.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you trying to be oblivious?What is unconventional is the frankly weird interest you are taking in what other men do in bed.
Yes, since God is immutable, and that His character is not contingent upon circumstance, we understand that the prohibitions and precepts that He deems righteous, are inherently so. Not to mention that either wisdom or experience teaches us of the hypocrisy of theft, the cowardice and weakness of lies, the lack of control of vice, the apathy of 'looking out for #1', ...
eg: One who doesn't tell the truth, can't handle the truth. The empty can makes the loudest noise. One who steals will not tolerate another stealing from them. A liar falsely and inconveniently assumes that everyone else is lying, because that is what they will do in the same situation, ...
There's an insanity to corruption.
I spoke of many things, predominantly my views were based on biological, and the resulting behavioral pattern, reasons.Well that is rather funny, given that you seem to get your views regarding sexual orientation from popular examples of such (go back to your post), apart from some religious text which you might swallow without thought - and not coming from actual evidence. Desperate? Look in the mirror, chum!
No you are pushing ideas because you have a book written in the iron age which you appear to think gives you the right to tell others what they should do in bed.Are you trying to be oblivious?
My concern is the promotion of acts that lead to destruction.
Tell me do you think your churlish little insults represent your religion and god well?I spoke of many things, simpleton, predominantly my views were based on biological, and the resulting behavioral pattern, reasons.
Why do you atheists always play the religious card, never, ever once have I brought that into the conversation worth mentioning?
looking forward to it.... ...a lot of your terminology is over my head, but we'll see what happens...Oh I’m a big fan of the first horn. Whenever we get into some philosophical tussle over the aseity-sovereignty paradox it just makes it that much easier on me
Earth to justanatheist, earth to justanatheist, please come in if you are there...?No you are pushing ideas because you have a book written in the iron age which you appear to think gives you the right to tell others what they should do in bed.
Homophobia is common in gay men who are surrounded by a hating environment. It's a method used to prove to everyone they're not gay.What is unconventional is the frankly weird interest you are taking in what other men do in bed.
No, but they do represent your nonsense and inability to follow a conversation, well.Tell me do you think your churlish little insults represent your religion and god well?
Your presuppositions are making you delirious, eh?True I am very good at avoiding baby rattles when certain types of christians lose it, they are often from very insular little communities and are not used to having their opinions challenged.
looking forward to it.... ...a lot of your terminology is over my head, but we'll see what happens...
Earth to justanatheist, earth to justanatheist, please come in if you are there...?
No, but they do represent your nonsense and inability to follow a conversation, well.
Your presuppositions are making you delirious, eh?
The interesting thing is that in the UK some of the views expressed and opinions offered would be getting perilously close to hate speech.This thread’s dangerously close to getting moderated, I suggest we all chill for a minute or it could hit everyone involved
Interested in this, have you discussed this in other threads, could you point them out?It’s a little paradox regarding the aseity of God (to exist a se is to exist without any dependency on anything else, to exist unto itself) and God’s sovereignty. I present the argument when someone makes claims that trigger the problem; wrong claims such as “God is the foundation of logic.”
Interested in this, have you discussed this in other threads, could you point them out?
Is that the religious branch of biological and behavioural science, since I doubt you will find any of the natural sort who would entertain or support your views. Your religious bias is obvious. That is why it is brought into the argument. Without such, you might be more inclined to look at evidence impartially and without judgment, if that were possible. But like many, you are more likely not to be able to do so since religious dogma is perched on one shoulder telling you what to think.I spoke of many things, predominantly my views were based on biological, and the resulting behavioral pattern, reasons.
Why do you atheists always play the religious card, never, ever once have I brought that into the conversation worth mentioning?
I was talking about compulsive desires, and if we chose to succumb to them.
Many people are violent in sex also, so there is a correlation - just for the record.
Abnormal =/= bad. Abnormal can be bad, but sometimes it's just neutral, with no moral connotation: consider left-handed people, when so many people are right-handed across nearly every culture. That's abnormal, but not bad.
So abnormality might be a necessary condition for moral wrongness, but it is not a sufficient condition.