Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes: by having no ethics or scruples whatsoever.
Nobody could ever do that and be at peace with themselves, there would be too much inner conflict. Everyone has values and boundaries, they would have to be going against those to be at peace with everyone.
In what way? Not sure I understand
How about if one accept others as they are without trying to change them to what we our self want others to be?
Yes, you may need to conflict with someone but it should come from a place of peace and love.
Probably not. Most people are basically good even when they're different from us or even disagreeable. Most. Some, however.
I personally could never accept someone who is a terrorist or has hurt a child or animal without remorse. I can not accept business owners that don't respect their employees. I can not accept entitled drivers that cut people off and risk lives by driving like an idiot.... Acceptance is a great thing, but it would be unhealthy to accept everyone.
Personally I tend to avoid conflicts as much as possible, I don't like conflicts
Sound like not accepting their action, but can you accept them as fellow human beings?
I mean that if a person has deeply-held values, they'll occasionally encounter people who are in opposition to those values.
Or to be open and accepting others value or views
I agree that negative thoughts may arise, but maybe the trick is to understand why those thoughts arise in our mind?
Right, but without conflicts wouldn't aggressive evil rule the world. Hitlers would love to rule the world without opposition.Personally I tend to avoid conflicts as much as possible, I don't like conflicts
*facepalm*
Possible. But it achieves nothing other than being considered a fool in this material world.