That would not surprise me at all. In fact, I would expect it.That's what I can't figure out....what exactly is Fox News' motivation here? I'd bet most of the on-air folks are themselves vaccinated and have taken precautions against COVID.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That would not surprise me at all. In fact, I would expect it.That's what I can't figure out....what exactly is Fox News' motivation here? I'd bet most of the on-air folks are themselves vaccinated and have taken precautions against COVID.
As Colbert put it, reality has a liberal bias. And yeah, Carlson is indeed dangerous. White supremacy groups love the guy.I've noticed this too. The left media seems biased in how it selects stories but on the whole more factual than what I see in right wing media. I think the pundits reveal the biggest divergence. Tucker Carlson is so far out there that I consider him dangerous.
There ya' go....I wonder how many of their viewers know that? I wonder if they'd care?The FOX and Friends hosts revealed they all got their shots this spring, but in recent weeks have been pushing conspiracy theories about how the government will face vaccinations.
Wait....what? Are you saying this is partially Democrat's fault because they haven't shut down Fox News and other right-wing media?It's not just Republicans creating all this.
Remember, the government has all the means to stop all internet news they don't approve of or deem dangerous (as in terrorist like dangerous)
There's a difference between political bias and spreading dangerous misinformation though.I agree they are not quite as bad, but they are still awful. They lost the plot during the Trump admin and were as bad a Fox for completely unrestrained bias.
A while ago I had my kids watch Rachael Maddow with me, and then right after watch Sean Hannity. I didn't say anything and just let them watch, and when we were done I asked them what they thought. They said they were stunned at the differences, and how Maddow's show had a lot of information and expertise (they liked how she brought on subject matter experts and let them talk), whereas Hannity's show was a lot of flashy graphics, name-calling, somewhat childish attacks, and very little actual information. My oldest said the Maddow show was boring because it was like a school lecture, and Hannity's was annoying because it was so juvenile.The UK has it's national media BBC and it is very good. The USA has NPR which is also very good. It seems the TV media is more influential in the USA, and much of that the evening pundits. I've watched a variety of sources. What I look at is the quality of the panels, their language, their claims, how emotional their statements are, and how well they align to what is known as being factual. There is a huge difference in how the right wing media presents it's views versus the left. Both do appeal to different kinds of emotions. But arguably our politics are highly troubling these days and the reality is Americans should be concerned and emotional about the future.
Short term gain, keep the eyeballs glued to the screen.That's what I can't figure out....what exactly is Fox News' motivation here? I'd bet most of the on-air folks are themselves vaccinated and have taken precautions against COVID.
607,000 Americans have died from it.Oh please.
Yeah all conservatives are going to die off from a sickness that kills a tiny percentage of the people that get it.
Supposedly. Out of 328 million.607,000 Americans have died from it.