• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Special Pleading and the PoE (Part 2)

F1fan

Veteran Member
What you responded with was a deflection from what I said.
I said: Just because God can do anything that does not mean God will or should do anything humans want Him to do...
Can you tell me why God should do anything humans want Him to do?
Because if it is to save an innocent life it would be the benevolent thing to do.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Not true. It's been the cornerstone of my opposition to your beliefs/claims. As I note if God knew cancers would eventually evolve in the human genetic process, and it approved this plan, then it intended cancers.
God did not approve any plan, because God has no plans. Only humans have plans. God does not have to plan anything because God knows everything all at once.
So perhaps God is good and humans are bad, and cancers are a way to get rid of many humans. That way your argument can work. No wonder God was killing humans left and right in the Old testament.
The way my argument works is that since God is omniscient and humans are not, God knows more than any human, so God knows the best course of action under any circumstance. Why did you deflect from that? Can’t you admit God knows more than you do?
Almost like God thinks we're pets, and not very fond of us. When my Cat Chester got cancer I spent a lot of money for his treatments. God just sits there and watches the child die despite the hard efforts of doctors to save the child.
Again you completely ignored what I said and deflected.

You are belittling the grace and mercy and bounty of God and what He does for us when He sends Messengers as if it is nothing, because like a small child, you want something else.
Nor benevolent. Assuming humans are special, that is.
You say that because you are not getting what you want, like a small child who did not get a bike from daddy for Christmas. I am sorry you cannot see that.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
And why would God bother sending Messengers? It doesn't care about us. The more you describe your God's attitude towards humans why would we care what God has to say? God is irrelevant to us.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Did God create the world deliberately?

If so, is God omniscient and knew that cancers would develop and affect many humans including children in the creation it was making?

If yes, then isn't God going forward with that creation a deliberate decision that humans will have to deal with cancers when they eventually evolve, and this decision will cause suffering to these humans since God could have created evolution without cancers?

How can God not be responsible for cancers developing when god could have created the world without cancers?

That cancers is something we have to deal with today is directly tied to God allowing them rather than God not allowing them as part of creation.
It is just too bad that God did not create the world they way you wanted Him to but you cannot know MORE than an omniscient God about how to create a world because you are not omniscient, and because you are not omniscient you cannot know the REASONS for everything God created and neither do I because I am not omniscient.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
God did not approve any plan, because God has no plans. Only humans have plans. God does not have to plan anything because God knows everything all at once.
Wow, so now God just made an arbitrary creation, even though it knew what would happen. So it just didn't care what would happen, and surprised itself as it created without a plan.

This is fascinating.

The way my argument works is that since God is omniscient and humans are not, God knows more than any human, so God knows the best course of action under any circumstance. Why did you deflect from that? Can’t you admit God knows more than you do?
Since no God is known to exist, and with me as an inferior being, I don't have adequate knowledge to say it does. What I can say is that our world functions as if no God exists.

You are belittling the grace and mercy and bounty of God and what He does for us when He sends Messengers as if it is nothing, because like a small child, you want something else.
My bad for not being impressed by God's Messengers as little children die of cancer. What was I thinking?

You say that because you are not getting what you want, like a small child who did not get a bike from daddy for Christmas. I am sorry you cannot see that.
I say God isn't benevolent because it would rather send Messengers than cure suffering children.

And I get my new $10K racing bikes from insurance settlements when I get hit by cars (this is actually true), so maybe God is benevolent to me, an atheist.

No, God is still a jerk.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
It is just too bad that God did not create the world they way you wanted Him to but you cannot know MORE than an omniscient God about how to create a world because you are not omniscient, and because you are not omniscient you cannot know the REASONS for everything God created and neither do I because I am not omniscient.
I agree, God should have created a world that isn't so brutal and cruel to some people. Do you agree? Wouldn't you prefer little children not dying?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
So cancer was part of God's design.

God intended for people to get cancer, then.
No, Tb said god had no plan, so cancer was, well it wasn't a mistake since God doesn't make mistakes, but God kew it was creating a world with cancer, and that must be good since God is benevolent. And that makes sense since God just isn't that into us.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
You keep making excuses. Now you won't even consider what we experience in our lives as relevant to whether God is benevolent.

So humans seem to be trash in your opinion, and therefore also God's opinion since you are speaking for this absent God.
I never said or even implied that humans are trash. How humans interpret what they experience in life and what they see in the world varies widely so that cannot be used to determine whether God is benevolent. All you can have is a personal opinion.
So why should humans bother with being moral in your religious system?
Because that is what Baha’u’llah enjoined us to do.
Yes, I use my intellectual freedom and don't blindly follow an irrational dogma. For someone who keep harping on free will you've given yours up to Baha’u’llah.
The Baha’i teachings are not irrational and they are not dogma. No, not at all. I used my free will to choose to believe in Baha’u’llah.
You work very hard to manipulate scenarios to make the label of benevolent apply to your God. After the last few posts of yours you've thrown humans under the bus because you like your God better than humanity.

I do not have to work on anything. All I have to do is read what Baha’u’llah wrote. He knows more than me because He got messages from the all-knowing God and I didn’t.
You've never offered a test that demonstrates a Messenger is authentic versus a fraud.
I told you there is no such test because if there was everyone would know who Baha’u’llah was. If there was God would not be able to separate the sheep from the goats.
You can believe whatever you want to and I will believe what I want to believe. The difference is that what I believe comes from God and what you believe comes from your own subjective determinations. In other words, it is based upon what you consider benevolent.
LOL, wow. You might as well claim to be God yourself. You are getting desperate.
Not even close. What I believe comes from God through Baha’u’llah, what you believe comes from your own ego.
Honest mortals acknowledge we have no idea if any gods exist.
Some of us honestly do know.
Untrue, you just wrote this "The difference is that what I believe comes from God"
So how could your beliefs be wrong? If your beliefs are from God we SHOULD be taking them at face value.
Didn’t you see the “I believe” in there? I do not expect you to believe what I believe. Can’t you separate you from me?
Well you've set up your beliefs to allow yourself no room to think twice and consider you may be mistaken. And that is a mistake.
I have had over 50 years to think and do research. If I don’t know my beliefs are true after all that time I’d have to be pretty slow.
Religious belief is rooted in emotion, not reason.
That is the fallacy of hasty generalization and a personal opinion. My beliefs are rooted in logic. I have no mushy-gushy feelings towards God, I only defend God because I like logic and I cannot stand to see illogic.
People are religious because they derive emotional reward from the various behaviors.
Good Lord Almighty! Do you think I get an emotional reward from spending all my time on forums talking to atheists? What behaviors? I do engage in any religious behaviors.

I do not care what other religious people do because I am not them.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
It's easy if you admit God is malevolent.
God is malevolent because He won’t do everything you want Him to. That is what it amounts to. How childish is that?
So God created us and just doesn't care. Why would any human with dignity want to worship this jerk?
So if God does not descend to earth on rescue missions, that means God does not care. How utterly illogical. This thread just keeps getting worse and worse.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
And why would God bother sending Messengers? It doesn't care about us. The more you describe your God's attitude towards humans why would we care what God has to say? God is irrelevant to us.
God sends Messengers because He does care about us. That's the only reason.
God is irrelevant to atheists because they don't get what they want and that don't like what God offers them.
They think that it is God's job to rescue them from pain and suffering but that is a misconception, and unless that is cleared up there is no hope that you will see the light.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Wow, so now God just made an arbitrary creation, even though it knew what would happen. So it just didn't care what would happen, and surprised itself as it created without a plan.

This is fascinating.
God knows everything so God knew what would happen and He cared.
My bad for not being impressed by God's Messengers as little children die of cancer. What was I thinking?

I say God isn't benevolent because it would rather send Messengers than cure suffering children.
It is God's job to send Messengers because only God can do that job.
It is not God's job to cure suffering children, that is the job for doctors. Even children know it's not God's job to cure them.
And I get my new $10K racing bikes from insurance settlements when I get hit by cars (this is actually true), so maybe God is benevolent to me, an atheist.

No, God is still a jerk.
I got 100K from an insurance settlement when I was hit by a car and I bought a vacation house. Well, I have to refi my house to buy the new house because it was 165K. Got that on a foreclosure in 2010 and it is worth about 500K now. God did not do anything, I did it all by myself, wheeling and dealing. Now I own three houses in full.

I have three bikes but they are nothing fancy. When I worked in the office I rode my bike to work 24 miles a day, rain or shine. It is a miracle I only got hit by a car once. It is an miracle I was not killed because the driver was going 55 MPH.

Maybe God is keeping us around for a reason. ;)
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I agree, God should have created a world that isn't so brutal and cruel to some people. Do you agree? Wouldn't you prefer little children not dying?
I agree that the suffering should be more evenly distributed. It does not seem fair that some people suffer so much more than others and that is what bothers me most. I have suffered for most of my life and only recently have I had any reprieve. You can see how old I am you know how long that is.

Little children that die are in God's hands and they were released from this dark and narrow place.
God is like a kind gardener who sometimes transfers children from earth to heaven.

From the death of that beloved youth due to his separation from you the utmost sorrow and grief has been occasioned, for he flew away in the flower of his age and the bloom of his youth, to the heavenly nest.
‘Abdu’l-Bahá, "Bahá’í World Faith (‘Abdu’l-Bahá section)", 83.1

But as he has been freed from this sorrow-stricken shelter and has turned his face toward the everlasting nest of the Kingdom and has been delivered from a dark and narrow world and has hastened to the sanctified realm of Light, therein lies the consolation of our hearts.
‘Abdu’l-Bahá, "Bahá’í World Faith (‘Abdu’l-Bahá section)", 83.2

The inscrutable divine wisdom underlies such heart-rending occurrences. It is as if a kind gardener transfers a fresh and tender shrub from a narrow place to a vast region. This transference is not the cause of the withering, the waning or the destruction of that shrub, nay rather it makes it grow and thrive, acquire freshness and delicacy and attain verdure and fruition. This hidden secret is well-known to the gardener, while those souls who are unaware of this bounty suppose that the gardener in his anger and wrath has uprooted the shrub. But to those who are aware this concealed fact is manifest and this predestined decree considered a favor. Do not feel grieved and disconsolate therefore at the ascension of that bird of faithfulness, nay under all circumstances pray and beg for that youth forgiveness and elevation of station.
‘Abdu’l-Bahá, "Bahá’í World Faith (‘Abdu’l-Bahá section)", 83.3
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
More modern, then; the tsunami in Japan back in 2011, Hurricane Katrina, the Joplin Tornado of 2011 (boy, that was a big year for Acts of God, huh?), Mt. St. Helens... Oh, but these are probably out of an omnipotent god's hands, right?
Right, because God is not responsible for them. These are not Acts of God. Humans created climate change by their activities on earth and humans are responsible to clean up their own messes.

Oh I almost forgot, “God is omnipotent so God can do anything” which translates to “God is omnipotent t so God should do everything I want Him to do.”:rolleyes:

I never said that humans are responsible for what they are born with or diseases they acquire later in life.
Loki's balls, if you twist any more you're gonna throw your back out. No, but you did say that they are human problems for which humans are responsible.
I said that because that is what they are. You cannot give me one good reason why God should be responsible except “God is omnipotent so God can do anything” which is not a reason why God should do jack squat. Get a dictionary. Ability does not imply responsibility.

Everyone but a few atheists (not all atheists) KNOWS that humans are responsible for human problems. These atheists should be embarrassed but they’re not.
Which doesn't really cover a lot of suffering, when it's all taken into account. Again, do try to explain how humans are responsible for diseases contracted. And better yet:

Humans are only responsible for their moral choices.
Explain how it's a moral choice to catch a disease, or fall victim to a drought or famine. Absolutely heartless.
I never said humans are responsible for diseases contracted, I only ever said that God is not responsible for playing doctor.

Explain why God should address drought and famine. You cannot give me one good reason why God should be responsible except “God is omnipotent so God can do anything” which is not a reason why God should do jack squat. Get a dictionary. Ability does not imply responsibility.

I never said that humans are responsible if that fall victim to a drought or famine, I only ever said that God is not responsible to address these problems. These are human problems and humans are responsible to fix them and they can fix them.
So it is as he intended, yes? There's nothing to fix? Your god is then evil. Fallible through that vileness, and absolutely unworthy of worship or veneration. Bearing such responsibility I would curse his name, scorn his ill-begotten crafts, and spit at the feet of those who come in his name. Luckily for my hospitality, I know that your claims are so much rose-lensed adoration.
There is nothing that God is responsible to fix, as humans are responsible to fix it since they caused it by their actions on earth.

You are not getting what you want so you curse God. Grow up. God should do everything so humans won’t have to do anything just because “God is omnipotent.”
Yes, however a god that can fix injustice and chooses not to is not benevolent.
God cannot fix injustice, humans have to fix it because they are the source of it. All mature adults know that. Grow up.
Oh really now. How nice to have you to tell me what I want and what I expect. What should I have for dinner, blazer?
It is crystal clear what you want and expect from God because it is written all throughout your posts. You God want to do everything and if He doesn’t you say He is not benevolent and throw a hissy fit like a small child.
You just pass the buck and call us all whining children as though vast and lingering suffering is comparable to [REDACTED] ice cream. It's disgusting, really.
I never compared vast and lingering suffering to ice cream. I said that whiny atheists who expect God to address the suffering are like children who want a different flavor of ice cream.

There is nothing more childish than an atheist who expects God to do everything humans are responsible for, and nothing more disgusting.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
What we do expect is that if your god wants to be called and considered the Prime Example of what is good and just, he needs to set that example. Right the injustices and environmental harms that we cannot fix.
Humans can fix injustices and environmental harms and they are 100% responsible to fix them since they created them.
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
Right, because God is not responsible for them.
What utter hogwash... So tell us then, what, exactly, does your god do? Climate change did not cause the tsunami, nor Katrina, nor Mount St. Helens. Tornadoes are as common to the Midwest as they come. You cannot rationally take only the good and completely ignore the bad that your god supposedly does. (Isaiah 45:7)

I never said that humans are responsible for what they are born with or diseases they acquire later in life.
Oh, so we're repeating ourselves now? Okay.
I think you should go to a country steeped in suffering, surrounded by those overburdened with poverty, famine, and sickness, and be forced to do nothing more than tell them to cheer up and that it's not so bad. You know, like a mother would do to a child whining about bloody ice cream.
All those problems that humanity faces are human problems for which humans are responsible.
Plain as day.

You cannot give me one good reason why God should be responsible
I think you need to understand what it being said, and what exactly is being expected.

No one is expecting your god to give us a kushy life. No one expects your god to give us a Corvette and $50,000. In your example, we don't want the [REDACTED] chocolate ice cream. What we do expect is that if your god wants to be called and considered the Prime Example of what is good and just, he needs to set that example. Right the injustices and environmental harms that we cannot fix. Be a good god. Otherwise he's a charlatan, a pretender, and at most evil.

You are not getting what you want so you curse God. Grow up.
Way to not read everything, blazer. But I'm beginning to expect that. No, I don't even curse your god. He's not worth that much effort. You also assume much about what I want, and my degree of comfort. You're trying desperately to make this about us, when really it's about your claims.

God cannot fix injustice,
Then your god is not all-powerful.

All mature adults know that. Grow up.
For as much as you like to sling fallacies around like so much confetti, very often you have engaged in this. Ad hominem. Act your age.

It is crystal clear what you want and expect from God because it is written all throughout your posts.
I would have thought it clear, but it's more clear that you're not actually reading what we write. I want nothing from your god, and expect nothing. Your claims, on the other hand...

I never compared vast and lingering suffering to ice cream.
Yes you did. And I'm not an atheist. After all this time, get it right.

So God is a man?
Do you understand what a metaphor is? I would assume so, given that all your prophets speak in them.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
What utter hogwash... So tell us then, what, exactly, does your god do? Climate change did not cause the tsunami, nor Katrina, nor Mount St. Helens. Tornadoes are as common to the Midwest as they come. You cannot rationally take only the good and completely ignore the bad that your god supposedly does. (Isaiah 45:7)
So God should have stopped the tsunami, and Katrina, and Mount St. Helens just because humans did not cause them? Why should God intervene in the natural world?

What does God do? God rules and maintains the universe of which earth is only a small part.

“Baha’is believe in an almighty creator who has fashioned the universe and has made man in his own image; they believe in a non-created cause of all existence, in a single God. The word ‘God’ is a symbol for that transcendent reality by which all existence is ruled and maintained. What we call God is not, as the critics of the concept of God believe, a product of human imagination, a creation of the mind, a fanciful invention which has no reality, or a reflection of particular social and economic circumstances.”
(Udo Schafer, the light that shineth in the darkness, p. 19)


7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

That means that God makes it possible for light and darkness, peace and evil.
No, I don't even curse your god. He's not worth that much effort.
Then your god is not all-powerful.
God could only fix it by (a) overriding the free will of humans or (b) taking away human free will

The 100 dollar question you cannot answer is why God should fix injustice when humans can learn to be just. They do not need God.
I would have thought it clear, but it's more clear that you're not actually reading what we write. I want nothing from your god, and expect nothing. Your claims, on the other hand...
Why do my claims bother you if they are so false? I am not bothered by what others believe that I consider false.
Do you understand what a metaphor is? I would assume so, given that all your prophets speak in them.
Then explain the metaphor and what you sought to convey by it.
 
Top