More modern, then; the tsunami in Japan back in 2011, Hurricane Katrina, the Joplin Tornado of 2011 (boy, that was a big year for Acts of God, huh?), Mt. St. Helens... Oh, but these are probably out of an omnipotent god's hands, right?
Right, because God is not responsible for them. These are not Acts of God. Humans created climate change by their activities on earth and humans are responsible to clean up their own messes.
Oh I almost forgot, “God is omnipotent so God can do anything” which translates to “God is omnipotent t so God should do everything I want Him to do.”
I never said that humans are responsible for what they are born with or diseases they acquire later in life.
Loki's balls, if you twist any more you're gonna throw your back out. No, but you did say that they are human problems for which humans are responsible.
I said that because that is what they are. You cannot give me one good reason why God should be responsible except “God is omnipotent so God can do anything” which is not a reason why God should do jack squat. Get a dictionary. Ability does not imply responsibility.
Everyone but a few atheists (not all atheists) KNOWS that humans are responsible for human problems. These atheists should be embarrassed but they’re not.
Which doesn't really cover a lot of suffering, when it's all taken into account. Again, do try to explain how humans are responsible for diseases contracted. And better yet:
Humans are only responsible for their moral choices.
Explain how it's a moral choice to catch a disease, or fall victim to a drought or famine. Absolutely heartless.
I never said humans are responsible for diseases contracted, I only ever said that God is not responsible for playing doctor.
Explain why God should address drought and famine. You cannot give me one good reason why God should be responsible except “God is omnipotent so God can do anything” which is not a reason why God should do jack squat. Get a dictionary. Ability does not imply responsibility.
I never said that humans are responsible if that fall victim to a drought or famine, I only ever said that God is not responsible to address these problems. These are human problems and humans are responsible to fix them and they can fix them.
So it is as he intended, yes? There's nothing to fix? Your god is then evil. Fallible through that vileness, and absolutely unworthy of worship or veneration. Bearing such responsibility I would curse his name, scorn his ill-begotten crafts, and spit at the feet of those who come in his name. Luckily for my hospitality, I know that your claims are so much rose-lensed adoration.
There is nothing that God is responsible to fix, as humans are responsible to fix it since they caused it by their actions on earth.
You are not getting what you want so you curse God. Grow up. God should do everything so humans won’t have to do anything just because “God is omnipotent.”
Yes, however a god that can fix injustice and chooses not to is not benevolent.
God cannot fix injustice, humans have to fix it because they are the source of it. All mature adults know that. Grow up.
Oh really now. How nice to have you to tell me what I want and what I expect. What should I have for dinner, blazer?
It is crystal clear what you
want and expect from God because it is written all throughout your posts. You God want to do everything and if He doesn’t you say He is not benevolent and throw a hissy fit like a small child.
You just pass the buck and call us all whining children as though vast and lingering suffering is comparable to [REDACTED] ice cream. It's disgusting, really.
I never compared vast and lingering suffering to ice cream. I said that whiny atheists who expect God to address the suffering are like children who want a different flavor of ice cream.
There is nothing more childish than an atheist who expects God to do everything humans are responsible for, and nothing more disgusting.