McBell
Resident Sourpuss
So you should have no problems with proving it is "absolutely false", right?Thats absolutely false.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So you should have no problems with proving it is "absolutely false", right?Thats absolutely false.
I was pointing out to you the deficiencies in your question. You first responded by trying to blame an earlier poster, but of course I wasn't talking about that poster, You've now responded by obfuscation, pretending my posts were not about your errors but something else.So when you tried vehemently to provide research strategies, you had no clue "FOR WHAT"!!
Very good. Good job.
I was pointing out to you the deficiencies in your question.
So you should have no problems with proving it is "absolutely false", right?
You made the claim that it is absolutely false.State what it is that I said is absolutely false clearly and concisely. Go ahead.
You made the claim that it is absolutely false.
Lol. Exactly "what" did I claim is absolutely false? Just saying "it" doesnt mean you understood anything.
So let me repeat, State what it is that I said is absolutely false clearly and concisely. Go ahead.
So you should have no problems with proving it is "absolutely false", right?Thats absolutely false. How could you come up with a false outcome like that? Who in the world makes a "no need" conclusion without a generalisation attempt? On what basis did you come up with the null hypothesis? Is that even a null hypothesis? What are the samples you had identified for this so called null hypothesis?I never had any doubt that we are born without belief so it never occurred to me to conduct an experiment. And since "no entity" or "no effect" is the null hypothesis, there is no need to.
Atheism is again the easier position to hold.
Lol. Sorry mate. This was a ridiculous statement you made. Unbelievable.
So what tune is this song and dance of yours to?
You are an Aerosmith fan, aren't you?
Then why am I fielding atheists left and right on all the threads I start about God?It is not ignorance or ego is it apathy, no one cares about your speculations,
You're very difficult to communicate with ─ the whole point was that you didn't know what it was about, and therefore you needed to tell me before I could reply.Without knowing what it was about!
You're very difficult to communicate with ─ the whole point was that you didn't know what it was about, and therefore you needed to tell me before I could reply.
But I guess like baby Moses you're in denial, so I'll leave you there.
Yeah, whatever. You were wrong, you blame others, that's you, no problem.Nah. Just that you didnt know what it was about. Like a baby you have no clue, so yes you should leave it there.
Yeah, whatever. You were wrong, you blame others, that's you, no problem.
I know you didn't know what you were talking about ─ you told me so yourself.Yeah. So in this exchange of rhetoric, you didnt even know if you are right or wrong. So you think others are just like you. Thats you. No problem.
I know you didn't know what you were talking about ─ you told me so yourself.
See, absolutely nothing to support your claim....I was a big Aerosmith fan. Thanks for the song cut and paste. Very much appreciated. I have this album but not in LP format.
But I dont dance. Maybe you do so you think others do too.
Have a good shake. Bye.
Definitely right.However I suspect the ease of atheism was not your reason for being an atheist. Was it?
See, absolutely nothing to support your claim....
This one:What claim?