So have you studied the Gospels? It seems like that's what you are insinuating. Well, that's great.
Maybe you might have a good response to this.
If you analyse the Gospel of Matthew, which is the first book of the NT, the oldest manuscript is P1. Its not a full text of the gospel but has about 37 lines in it. The significance of this manuscript is that it contains the inscriptio.
Now as we know in modern times the Gospel of Matthew is called "Gospel of Matthew", but if you look at this manuscript which is the oldest so far found, it does not begin with that title. It begins with "Book of genealogy of Jesus Christ son of David son" which is in fact the title. Which means there is no authorship attributed to this writing. So it is much later that we find the Kata Matthew emerging. Thus, someone, some centuries later started calling it "Gospel", and not only that, began calling it "Matthew". Well hold on, Matthew the name emerged few centuries later according to manuscript evidence, and the word "Gospel" emerged even later.
So can you explain how this book would even be called a Gospel? How do you know it is supposed to be called a Gospel? We can leave the name Matthew aside for now.
Can you explain?
The same way I been explaining to you, you know signs of God from God in form of words to be from God through belief in Nubuwa. Nubuwa Mohammad (s) is the last, but not the only.
Do you know what all Messengers were told when they threatened their cities with destruction? This is just stories of the past, nobody been destroyed, this even when destroyed cities are on open roads close by.
History is one of the arguments Pharaoh argued against Moses, he is saying where all these Messengers in history like you?
It's a classic thing despite all the records all over the earth, whether destroyed cities or texts about miracles in journals if people won't believe in scriptures, to call them stories of the past by historians of the time who most probably are of magog, and nothing has changed. The only thing this century has ample of evidence of destroyed cities and proofs of miracles in history and proofs of Nubuwa all over the earth, but act ignorant, and historians especially are the worse like ostriches who put their hands in the sand and talk non-sense.
You show me when history was ever reliable that I should trust it now.
The way to truth never been to approach it this way.
Nubuwa is independent of rules humans invent in studying authenticity of texts and history.
More over, Resalah is words of the person sent by God paraphrasing God's teachings, and even that is not subject to games of ilmej rijall and historical authenticity. It's light and compliments Nubuwa in a way that you don't need man made rules to know Rasool spoke those words. Sunnah is a miracle in itself - but Quran and Nubuwa way higher miracles as the latter is God's way speaking in proofs and ways that prove insights and miraculous form.
Leave all that history rubbish aside and just read the text itself and let God speak to you because Nubuwa needs listeners and attentive hearts.