People find hope in other religions too. Are you supportive of and extol the virtues of following those as well, because they are good for those who practice them? If the being good for you is the measure of the truth of something, then certainly you must believe in them as well?
Yes, people do join other religions and they express that they find hope in the teachings which may or may not be based on the Bible.
What does that have to do with whether the Bible is good or not? ...and why must I believe in them for the reason they believe?
Oh, I get it.
So you are saying that those religions have teachings that gives people hope and helps people to avoid and reject the vices, along with the problems that go with them. Hence, I should accept them because they are good.
Did I understand correctly?
It's a very good point and sounds very interested. I'm interested in seeing these teachings and the experiences..
I do acknowledge that there are some teachings among Hindus and Muslim, and I suppose, likely Buddhist, that gives good discipline.
Just the same, I acknowledge that there are institutes that give good advice that helps people, and gives them hope.
I like the noble endeavors of the producers of "Super Book", and think they have done an excellent job, in giving children and possibly adults, hope, and good moral direction.
The OP was not made to compare.
However, what I am getting from your argument, is that a few things don't make something good overall, and I think that's a good point.
So in that case, my question
here would follow...
I'm opened to the experience of others.
What proof can you give to show the Bible is bad for us?
I'm not an expert on the Qur'an, but maybe people with more experience can give their side on there being proof it is good for us... although I am not denying that, or supporting it.
Are you in a position to do so?