Secret Chief
nirvana is samsara
My bad. Didn't realise the OP had a link. D'uh.Sorry, I'm not sure what you're asking.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
My bad. Didn't realise the OP had a link. D'uh.Sorry, I'm not sure what you're asking.
Nothing odd at all. It was a hypothetical to try to demonstrate your bias against and stereotyping of Christians. I suspect you feel one way about one situation (religion) and a different way of it we’re race. In other words, you belief or disbelieve the allegations in a lawsuit based merely on your preconceived notions about particular groups.Seems an odd one since race has nothing to do with it, and it's a very safe bet the person in question is Christian or Muslim.
I don't deny I'm biased against it. Nor do I hide that I do consider myself an anti-Christ. That's why I keep bringing up stories and examples and links to support my claims, things that give me no reason to doubt the OP.Nothing odd at all. It was a hypothetical to try to demonstrate your bias against and stereotyping of Christians. I suspect you feel one way about one situation (religion) and a different way of it we’re race. In other words, you belief or disbelieve the allegations in a lawsuit based merely on your preconceived notions about particular groups.
I don't deny I'm biased against it. Nor do I hide that I do consider myself an anti-Christ. That's why I keep bringing up stories and examples and links to support my claims, things that give me no reason to doubt the OP.
And of course not all of them are such cretins, but it still stands they believe in a god who wants so many of us dead. A god who stands for and permits things we see and heinously cruel and illegal. Some Christians may not be bad people, but their "holy book" still uses the term "righteous" to refer to a man who volunteered his daughters to be gang raped. They still promote a book that promotes values that inherently and fundamentally incompatible with modern values, such as freedom of religion.
Nothing odd at all. It was a hypothetical to try to demonstrate your bias against and stereotyping of Christians. I suspect you feel one way about one situation (religion) and a different way of it we’re race. In other words, you belief or disbelieve the allegations in a lawsuit based merely on your preconceived notions about particular groups.
And none of that has anything to do with whether THIS particular Panera manager said or did the things alleged in a lawsuit. Maybe he did. Maybe he didn’t. And most likely, the company will settle the case before we ever find out, not necessarily because there is liability, but perhaps because settling early is more cost effective than protracted litigation.I don't deny I'm biased against it. Nor do I hide that I do consider myself an anti-Christ. That's why I keep bringing up stories and examples and links to support my claims, things that give me no reason to doubt the OP.
And of course not all of them are such cretins, but it still stands they believe in a god who wants so many of us dead. A god who stands for and permits things we see and heinously cruel and illegal. Some Christians may not be bad people, but their "holy book" still uses the term "righteous" to refer to a man who volunteered his daughters to be gang raped. They still promote a book that promotes values that inherently and fundamentally incompatible with modern values, such as freedom of religion.
Whatever the Bible says about rape is irrelevant to this particular lawsuit. Or are you suggesting that the allegations against the Panera manager MUST be true because of what the Bible says about rape???She quoted the bible (about rape), and that is not a preconceived notion.
Oh, so you believe the allegations too?She should shrink his head, which would, of course, verify that her religion is real, and it would make his voice much softer and higher in pitch.
It is supporting why I do not doubt the OP. To me I see nothing that seems made up or fabricated, and I'll keep going on to support my claim if you want.And none of that has anything to do with whether THIS particular Panera manager said or did the things alleged in a lawsuit. Maybe he did. Maybe he didn’t. And most likely, the company will settle the case before we ever find out, not necessarily because there is liability, but perhaps because settling early is more cost effective than protracted litigation.
I am merely pointing out Christians have all sorts of justifications for their wickedness in the Bible. And, indeed, for many centuries women in the Christian West did suffer from their being no concept of domestic abuse and rape. Women are, after all, according to the Bible, supposed to be subservient to men to be fully submissive to them.Whatever the Bible says about rape is irrelevant to this particular lawsuit.
She should shrink his head, which would, of course, verify that her religion is real, and it would make his voice much softer and higher in pitch.