• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Red Giant Sun

Regiomontanus

Ματαιοδοξία ματαιοδοξιών! Όλα είναι ματαιοδοξία.
The Sun puts out a solar wind of particles, and you can come up with an average rate per thousand years. That rate might relate to its surface temperature, surface activity, surface area. Over time this will slightly decrease the mass of the Sun and therefore its gravitational force, but by how much?

Is the Sun Losing Mass? | by Brian Koberlein

The above article says its losing 174 trillion tons per year. You just multiply that by 5 billion years (or however many years) and then recalculate the strength of the Sun's gravitational pull. Then you can recalculate the shape and size of the planetary circuits.

Over the lifetime of a star like ours (spectral type G2), that mass loss is about 0.06% of what it started with. So planetary orbits will not change a huge amount.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Yes and no. The accretion disk of gas and dust around an active black hole is hot. But the BH event horizon itself is very cold (and BHs do not always have accretion disks anyway).
I am not talking about a black-hole. Sun will never be a black-hole. It will finally be a white dwarf and then a blacfk dwarf. No event horizons involved.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
It would appear that science generally accepts that the sun will eventually become a red giant, consuming the planets closest to it.

Red Giant Stars: Facts, Definition & the Future of the Sun | Space

Which leaves me with the following question:

The planets of the solar system stay in orbit because of the sun's gravity. Why would it be concluded that as the sun expands that the gravitational pull would remain constant and the planets would remain in their orbit. Wouldn't it stand to reason that as the sun expands, the sun's gravity would weaken resulting in orbit of the planets expanding outward?

Why or why not?
For this simple Newtonian physics is accurate enough. The mass of an object that one rotates around is all that matters. Well as long as one is not inside that body. When it comes to orbits the Sun can be treated as a point mass for the planets. Again, you are going to have some minor relativistic problems with Mercury's orbit if one does so, but for this discussion. that error is negligible.

I could go over the math, but it is covered by the Shell theorem:

Shell theorem
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The gravity from a spherical object acts as if the whole mass is concentrated at the center.

So, while an expanded sun would be less *dense*, it would still have the same *mass* (excluding loss from the higher solar winds at that point). And so the gravitational effect of anything *outside* of the sun would remain the same.

Now, the surface of the sun would be at a larger distance from the center, and so the 'surface gravity' would be lower, but that isn't what is relevant for the motion of the planets.
Darn! Two hours too late:D
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Even though I doubt humans will be living on Earth when all this happens, but what kinds of effects might we see when Mercury and then Venus are consumed? Would either of those being destroyed cause problems? I suspect by then the Earth will be too hot anyway but ...
 

Regiomontanus

Ματαιοδοξία ματαιοδοξιών! Όλα είναι ματαιοδοξία.
I am not talking about a black-hole. Sun will never be a black-hole. It will finally be a white dwarf and then a blacfk dwarf. No event horizons involved.

Correct. Your edit to your previous post has clarified that you were not referring to BHs.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Even though I doubt humans will be living on Earth when all this happens, but what kinds of effects might we see when Mercury and then Venus are consumed? Would either of those being destroyed cause problems? I suspect by then the Earth will be too hot anyway but ...

Not particularly. First of all, the expanded sun will be huge but not very dense. There would be some increase in the friction in their orbits, so they would gradually spiral in to the center, but that would take a fairly long time to do. The temperature at the surface of a red giant is 'only' about 3-4000K, so would not even cause the break up of those planets.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Correct. Your edit to your previous post has clarified that you were not referring to BHs.

One amusing aside is that if the sun were replaced by a BH of the same mass, the orbits of the planets would not be affected. The gravitational effect at a distance would be the same.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Not particularly. First of all, the expanded sun will be huge but not very dense. There would be some increase in the friction in their orbits, so they would gradually spiral in to the center, but that would take a fairly long time to do. The temperature at the surface of a red giant is 'only' about 3-4000K, so would not even cause the break up of those planets.
So almost as hot as a good Finnish Sauna:

95393965-beautiful-nature-interior-home-finnish-sauna-room-background-inside-the-sauna-hot-stones-in-the-bath.jpg
 

Regiomontanus

Ματαιοδοξία ματαιοδοξιών! Όλα είναι ματαιοδοξία.
Even though I doubt humans will be living on Earth when all this happens, but what kinds of effects might we see when Mercury and then Venus are consumed? Would either of those being destroyed cause problems? I suspect by then the Earth will be too hot anyway but ...

Many of the details of what exactly will happen are not clear. However, in 'just' 2 billion years or so (a few billion years before it leaves the 'main-sequence') the sun will have heated up enough to boil off the oceans here. So when the sun does eventually run out of hydrogen to fuse and then, eventually, create a planetary nebula (new estimates show the sun is barely massive enough for that to happen), our planet will be long dead already.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Not particularly. First of all, the expanded sun will be huge but not very dense. There would be some increase in the friction in their orbits, so they would gradually spiral in to the center, but that would take a fairly long time to do. The temperature at the surface of a red giant is 'only' about 3-4000K, so would not even cause the break up of those planets.
I was also forgetting about the increase in heat from the Sun, such that Earth would be uninhabitable long before the Sun expands. :oops:
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Many of the details of what exactly will happen are not clear. However, in 'just' 2 billion years or so (a few billion years before it leaves the 'main-sequence') the sun will have heated up enough to boil off the oceans here. So when the sun does eventually run out of hydrogen to fuse and then, eventually, create a planetary nebula (new estimates show the sun is barely massive enough for that to happen), our planet will be long dead already.
A mere billion years according to some, but perhaps we will have found some piece of rock on which to shelter. :D
 

Suave

Simulated character
It would appear that science generally accepts that the sun will eventually become a red giant, consuming the planets closest to it.

Red Giant Stars: Facts, Definition & the Future of the Sun | Space

Which leaves me with the following question:

The planets of the solar system stay in orbit because of the sun's gravity. Why would it be concluded that as the sun expands that the gravitational pull would remain constant and the planets would remain in their orbit. Wouldn't it stand to reason that as the sun expands, the sun's gravity would weaken resulting in orbit of the planets expanding outward?

Why or why not?

Based on the amount of solar mass lost as sol converts her mass into energy, I've figure the Earth's orbit is approximately 1.5 centimeters further away from the Sun than what the Earth's orbit had been during its previous orbit. This means the Earth's orbit around the Sun will be at an average distance of 150.1 million kilometers in a few billion years. However, the Sun's surface will have expanded to a radius of 150.1 million kilometers after exhausting her hydrogen by then and subsequently make contact with Earth.
 

Suave

Simulated character
Or vastly improved air conditioner technology:p

In a thousand generations from now, Tau Ceti will be approximately 10 light years away from Earth. This would be within a hundred years range of a multi-generational fusion propelled rocket ship travelling an appreciable fraction of light's speed. The mean surface temperature of Tau Ceti E with an Earth-like atmosphere would be approximately 154 degrees Fahrenheit. [1] Higher elevation regions a couple of miles above Tau Ceti E's sea level would be hardly bearable at nearly 100 degrees Fahrenheit without air conditioning. Yes, improved air conditioner technology would be needed there.
  1. Giovanni F. Bignami (2015). The Mystery of the Seven Spheres: How Homo sapiens will Conquer Space. Springer. ISBN 9783319170046., Page 110.
 
Top