The so-called Equality Act[sic] has passed the House. One of it’s provisions is to allow any religious congregation that has separate sections based on gender to be open to being sued. In other words, destroyed by litigation.
Instead of being on the defense, each time the Democrats try to pervert the Constitution, the impacted people need to go on the offense, by pushing the law to its irrational limits, but in their own favor. The mistake that is always made by Conservatives ,is to accept the nonsense premises that come from the perverted Left They then stay on the defensive, complaining and back peddling. This allows the criminals to push the nonsense, uncontested, until it becomes the norm.
The way you deal with this is by going on the offense and using the law, in large numbers, in ways that can backfire on the Democrats. The dummies never think these things through, but historically assume they will remain on the offense.
For example, Nancy Pelosi has her own restroom in Congress, and since this restroom is a paid for by tax payer dollars, does she now have to share at risk of litigation? Or did the hypocrites in Congress add provisions to exempt themselves with dual standards? Republican members of Congress, for example, can push this to the limit, since they are inside the security wall of defense, that may have been added to justify her exemption.
Teenage boys, in public high schools, always have sex on the brain. Now they have right to use all female facilities, such as locker rooms, sports, bathrooms and even teacher lounges. They can push the law by pretending to be semi-transient he-shes, for the day or week. This allows them be legal peeping Toms, who can be trusted not to look, for that day.
Gender is now sold as being fluid, so transient is consistent with that. Once enough females get very uncomfortable and fear using the restrooms and lockerrooms, full of transient gender he-shes, they will sue and defeat the law, blaming the Democrats for the cultivation of perversion. They should have known boys will be boys.
The quota system for hiring could be made more complicated if the discriminated males become gender fluid for the day or month up to employment decision. Now this law can be used return the system so it is based on the best qualified "gender fluid", person. Gender is not a choice, but can grab you at anytime, right?
Most of alimony in our culture goes to females. Does this violate the new law, and should all future alimony payments and obligation better reflect the demographics in terms of sex and gender? The fluid gender defense can now be used by the males to alter alimony law. This could be used to peel away female vote, since females will not like losing the dual standard that they currently, have.
The fluidity of gender means you can use this defense when you need it. Any lawyer defense against this fluid choice, can then be used against everyone who claims gender differences. This will force Congress to define gender in a definitive way. The way you deal with this is to require science to set the standard, since they will be trusted to be more objective, than self serving politicians who lie for a living. Hard data will need to be presented so anyone can draw the same conclusions. Science will need to reverse this policy, since this is all nonsense and has no biological and genetic basis. This is all about choice and will power, albeit based on the superego of culture; fad. This fad affects the left more, which is expected, since they are more likely to become herd animals; they like herd orientations like socialism.