• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Truth: either God exists or He don't.

Pilgrim Soldier

Active Member
How exactly do you know these things as facts?

I agree. I think that you are appealing to someone elses imagination. Your beliefs do not originate with you.

You know? How so? Anyway, if he doesn't reveal this truth to those he wants to, which means that there is no objective standard that we can test whether God exists, then his existence isnt a fact.

I don't care about what a book says in the context of our conversation. You said that we can look to creation and obviously see that it was designed and this is proof of your god. My point is that I can just as well come to the conclusion that multiple gods exist based off the "design" argument or some other alternative.

Irrelevent to the point.
Nobody can prove anything to anyone. I've never heard of a single case in human history where someone has proven something to someone else.
IU will give my hose to anyone who can prove anything to me. In order to prove something to someone, both parties must believe the same thing before hand, so in that case they never actually proved anything at all.

I believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, because He said "I am the truth" so the truth is a person. It's not an idea or political movement. Jesus said He enters people and abides in them, so those people have the truth abiding in them.

I don't have any authority to command God to reveal Himself to you, all I can do is pray for you but the choice is still His.
 

Samael_Khan

Goosebender
Nobody can prove anything to anyone. I've never heard of a single case in human history where someone has proven something to someone else.
IU will give my hose to anyone who can prove anything to me. In order to prove something to someone, both parties must believe the same thing before hand, so in that case they never actually proved anything at all.
That is a very weird outlook. If someone asks me to prove that I have a metal ruler, I take it out of my bag and show them, which results in them knowing that I have one. This has happened many times before. So I don't know what you are talking about.

I believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, because He said "I am the truth" so the truth is a person. It's not an idea or political movement. Jesus said He enters people and abides in them, so those people have the truth abiding in them.
So you believe that someone is the truth just because they said so?

I don't have any authority to command God to reveal Himself to you, all I can do is pray for you but the choice is still His.
Well, then it is pointless for you to say that God is true to me isn't it?
 

Samael_Khan

Goosebender
You're absolutely right, God never holds anyone accountable or guilty for their nature. The only reason God punishes people with eternal hell fire is because of their sin.

I'm not sure why everyone who accuses God of unfairness, always conveniently ignored the gigantic elephant in the room. They always ignore the fact that the wicked sinner spent his life in utter sinful rebellion and defiance before God.

God never punishes anyone, because they were born with a nature bent towards sin and rebellion.
I think you meant to take the comma out of the last sentence otherwise you would be contradicting yourself?

My point is that the sin results from their nature. There are sins done because of someones nature, such as alcohol addiction, and then there is sins which are choices, such as murder. God can't hold people accountable for the former sin but can hold people accountable for the latter sin.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
I would like to avoid a long and drawn out, evolution v creation debate here. I found most people are not interested in facts, they are more interested in promoting their own beliefs. So I don't think a long debate will change anyone's mind.

I would just like you to consider the mathematical probability of your of creation by spontaneous natural processes.
I saw this program which deals with this very subject, it lays out the various possibilities and then they calculate their mathematical probabilities. I don't expect you to watch it but I think it would be useful to know these equations, as they may be helpful for any future discussions on the topic.

Yet another video that ignores the reason we 'fit' into the ecosystem of Earth: we evolved here. So of course we are well adapted to being here.

But, there are also a number of statements in that video that are simply false. For example, life could certainly exist if the levels of oxygen or nitrogen were a bit different: in fact, they were different *on Earth* in the past and life did quite well.

The video makes a lot of claims that life could not exist if things were slightly different. But we know things *were* different in the past and yet life did quite well. For example, the length of the day has been changing over geological time. The distance to the moon has gradually been growing larger. The parameters of the orbit of the Earth change over time.

So, no, there is simply NOT the 'fine tuning' claimed in the video. Life does quite well in many different environments. There is life that *requires* a lack of oxygen in the atmosphere. There is life that uses sulfur instead of oxygen. There are species that have more than two genders. There are species live where no light ever penetrates.

The video also gets many things wrong. For example, Newton's 'law' of gravity is not the most accurate description of gravity. Instead, general relativity, due to Einstein, is a better description.

Further, the actual computation of probabilities in the video makes many assumptions that are known to be wrong. I have gone over some above, but a deeper issue is that the 501 different parameters are NOT independent of each other, so a simply multiplication of probabilities is NOT correct. I would also argue that the probabilities given are not even close to the correct values.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
I can only proclaim what I know for a fact, i know the most high God because He has revealed Himself to me so I don't have the problem of doubt or the fear of the unknown.

I'm not appealing to my imagination when I proclaim that there is only One True Creator of all things most high God".

I don't know why He doesn't reveal the truth about Himself to everyone, but I know that He could if He wanted to but it's obvious He doesn't want to.

God said, all those other gods you mentioned above are Demons. Satan is the most powerful creature in the universe, but He can't do anything without God's permission, same goes for all the Demons.

God has described Himself as a jealous God, who wants all the glory and worship for Himself so He destroys all the other gods.

You may hold these beliefs quite strongly, but there is a BIG difference between that and knowing them for a fact. If you really 'know them for a fact', you would be able to supply actual evidence showing them to be the only plausible alternative. But, instead, you give a video that is full of inaccuracies and outright falsehoods. if this is what you base your beliefs on, I am sorry to tell you it isn't what is supported by the science.

As for the rest of your mythology, many people have believed many things about the supernatural for many generations. I have yet to see *any* evidence that supports even the existence of a supernatural, let alone of actual beings that are supernatural.
 

SalixIncendium

अग्निविलोवनन्दः
Staff member
Premium Member
Bhakti is the Sanskrit term for "Path of Devotion". Jnana is the Sanskrit term for "Path of Wisdom". Seva is the Sanskrit term for "Path of Service"

In this way, all people have a chance to work towards liberation, Self Realization, Happiness (or whatever they call their goal)

One path is not higher than the other, just different ways, so that each person can find a way that fits him best

Seva? I've always seen these three paths referred to as bhakti (devotion/worship), jnana (knowledge/wisdom), and karma (service/action).

Can you point me to where the path of service is referred to a seva?
 

Pilgrim Soldier

Active Member
That is a very weird outlook. If someone asks me to prove that I have a metal ruler, I take it out of my bag and show them, which results in them knowing that I have one. This has happened many times before. So I don't know what you are talking about.

So you believe that someone is the truth just because they said so?

Well, then it is pointless for you to say that God is true to me isn't it?
I still have the final say, whether that steel ruler is real or just an illusion so you still can't prove it's real if I don't accept what you claim it to be.

Jesus is not someone, He is all in all. He created the universe and every speck of dust in it so that gives Him special privileges and special credibility. You can think of it as diplomatic immunity.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
I still have the final say, whether that steel ruler is real or just an illusion so you still can't prove it's real if I don't accept what you claim it to be.

Jesus is not someone, He is all in all. He created the universe and every speck of dust in it so that gives Him special privileges and special credibility. You can think of it as diplomatic immunity.

Denying fact is called delusion.
 

Pilgrim Soldier

Active Member
I think you meant to take the comma out of the last sentence otherwise you would be contradicting yourself?

My point is that the sin results from their nature. There are sins done because of someones nature, such as alcohol addiction, and then there is sins which are choices, such as murder. God can't hold people accountable for the former sin but can hold people accountable for the latter sin.
Drunkenness or "alcohol addiction" as you call it is a grievous sin. Children don't drink alcohol, so the drunkard made a decision to rebel against God and abuse alcohol at some point in his life when he was mature enough to deliberately sin against God.
God hates drug and alcohol abuse, as these substances are used in witchcraft. They are used to open the door to Demons.
All sins deserve God's wrath and punishment, it doesn't matter a person murders someone in the heat of the moment or if they plan it for months, they are still murderers and they must be punished as murderers.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Drunkenness or "alcohol addiction" as you call it is a grievous sin. Children don't drink alcohol, so the drunkard made a decision to rebel against God and abuse alcohol at some point in his life when he was mature enough to deliberately sin against God.
God hates drug and alcohol abuse, as these substances are used in witchcraft. They are used to open the door to Demons.
All sins deserve God's wrath and punishment, it doesn't matter a person murders someone in the heat of the moment or if they plan it for months, they are still murderers and they must be punished as murderers.

God allowed the purchase of strong drink in Deuteronomy 14:26 for celebration of bringing in the tithes.
 

Pilgrim Soldier

Active Member
Yet another video that ignores the reason we 'fit' into the ecosystem of Earth: we evolved here. So of course we are well adapted to being here.

But, there are also a number of statements in that video that are simply false. For example, life could certainly exist if the levels of oxygen or nitrogen were a bit different: in fact, they were different *on Earth* in the past and life did quite well.

The video makes a lot of claims that life could not exist if things were slightly different. But we know things *were* different in the past and yet life did quite well. For example, the length of the day has been changing over geological time. The distance to the moon has gradually been growing larger. The parameters of the orbit of the Earth change over time.

So, no, there is simply NOT the 'fine tuning' claimed in the video. Life does quite well in many different environments. There is life that *requires* a lack of oxygen in the atmosphere. There is life that uses sulfur instead of oxygen. There are species that have more than two genders. There are species live where no light ever penetrates.

The video also gets many things wrong. For example, Newton's 'law' of gravity is not the most accurate description of gravity. Instead, general relativity, due to Einstein, is a better description.

Further, the actual computation of probabilities in the video makes many assumptions that are known to be wrong. I have gone over some above, but a deeper issue is that the 501 different parameters are NOT independent of each other, so a simply multiplication of probabilities is NOT correct. I would also argue that the probabilities given are not even close to the correct values.
There are highly educated people on both sides of the argument, they have been debating this topic since time began and they will continue to debate it long after we die.

The reality is, nobody can force someone to believe their theory. we're all free to believe whatever we choose to believe. But the cold harsh truth of the ,matter is, it doesn't matter what anyone believes the truth remains unchanged and the truth will have His way no matter what any man believes.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Seva? I've always seen these three paths referred to as bhakti (devotion/worship), jnana (knowledge/wisdom), and karma (service/action).

Can you point me to where the path of service is referred to a seva?
A) EASTERN SPIRITUALITY - Seva
Selfless service or Seva is a service which is performed without any expectation of result or award for performing it. Such services can be performed to benefit other human beings or society.

The idea of selfless service (seva also sewa) is an important concept in a number of religions because God is perceived as having an interest in the well-being of others as well as oneself; serving other people is considered an essential devotional practice of indirectly serving God and living a religious life that is a benefit to others.

"Living creatures are nourished by food, and food is nourished by rain; rain itself is the water of life, which comes from selfless worship and service." - Bhagavad Gita, 3.14

B) All Sikhs are encouraged by their Guru (Guru Granth Sahib) to perform Seva or Selfless Service
Seva in Sikhism
In Sikhism, seva refers to selfless service for altruistic purposes on behalf of, and for the betterment of a community. Sikhs have a tradition of seva. ... Seva is a means to promote humility and demote egoism which is a basic concept of the Sikh religion and is one of three fundamental principles of Sikhism.

C) Seva is a Sanskrit word meaning selfless service. In the Bhagavad Gita it is said "offer all your actions to God (meaning selfless)"
Bg 3.9: Work done as a sacrifice for Viṣṇu has to be performed; otherwise work causes bondage in this material world. Therefore, O son of Kuntī, perform your prescribed duties for His satisfaction, and in that way you will always remain free from bondage.

What is Seva in Hinduism?
Seva is a Sanskrit word meaning selfless service, and perhaps considered the most important part of any spiritual practice. It lies at the heart of the path of karma yoga—selfless action—and asks us to serve others with no expectation of outcome.

What is Seva in yoga?
The word "Seva" is a Sanskrit word often associated with the facet of yoga meaning “service.” However, it is more than just a simple desire to help others. ... It is an expression of compassion for others and a genuine desire to uplift those around you.
@stvdvRFseva
 

Pilgrim Soldier

Active Member
You may hold these beliefs quite strongly, but there is a BIG difference between that and knowing them for a fact. If you really 'know them for a fact', you would be able to supply actual evidence showing them to be the only plausible alternative. But, instead, you give a video that is full of inaccuracies and outright falsehoods. if this is what you base your beliefs on, I am sorry to tell you it isn't what is supported by the science.

As for the rest of your mythology, many people have believed many things about the supernatural for many generations. I have yet to see *any* evidence that supports even the existence of a supernatural, let alone of actual beings that are supernatural.
The most highest God, actually said He hides facts from certain people. He said they will seek diligently but they will never find the truth. His statement has not been proven wrong, even though so called scientists have been trying to prove Him wrong for the past 6000 years they still haven't manages to prove anything.

God said that He has blinded the eyes of the unbelievers, so they can't see the truth and He has closed their minds so they will never understand the truth. I don't know why He does this but I know He has the right to do whatever He wants to and there's no power in the universe to challenge Him.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
The most highest God, actually said He hides facts from certain people. He said they will seek diligently but they will never find the truth. His statement has not been proven wrong, even though so called scientists have been trying to prove Him wrong for the past 6000 years they still haven't manages to prove anything.

God said that He has blinded the eyes of the unbelievers, so they can't see the truth and He has closed their minds so they will never understand the truth. I don't know why He does this but I know He has the right to do whatever He wants to and there's no power in the universe to challenge Him.

It's great when you can just make stuff up and no one can prove you wrong, eh? We haven't even established the existence of God, and yet you have his mind all figured out.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
The most highest God, actually said He hides facts from certain people. He said they will seek diligently but they will never find the truth. His statement has not been proven wrong, even though so called scientists have been trying to prove Him wrong for the past 6000 years they still haven't manages to prove anything.

Isn't that convenient? Those who don't believe will never get the evidence needed to convince them otherwise. And those who believe see evidence everywhere.

How would that be different than simply not existing at all?

Oh...people claimed that God said he hides facts. Whether those people were correct cannot be demonstrated.

God said that He has blinded the eyes of the unbelievers, so they can't see the truth and He has closed their minds so they will never understand the truth. I don't know why He does this but I know He has the right to do whatever He wants to and there's no power in the universe to challenge Him.

Sure, but that hardly makes this being *moral*. If anything, it looks like the morality of a ill-managed elementary school playground.

In any case, not exactly a being worth worshiping.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
There are highly educated people on both sides of the argument, they have been debating this topic since time began and they will continue to debate it long after we die.

And there are those who actually look at the facts and others that try to fit the facts to what they already believe. Guess which side that video falls on?

The reality is, nobody can force someone to believe their theory. we're all free to believe whatever we choose to believe. But the cold harsh truth of the ,matter is, it doesn't matter what anyone believes the truth remains unchanged and the truth will have His way no matter what any man believes.

Yes, the truth will win out whether or not you or I believe in it.

So, the question is where does the evidence point?
 

Pilgrim Soldier

Active Member
Denying fact is called delusion.
What are facts, who decides. We need to establish what something is before we can accept it as a valid thing. We live in a world where there's no such thing as facts, everything is subject to our individual preference. Your facts are not my facts. We all invent our own facts as we go along our merry way.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
What are facts, who decides. We need to establish what something is before we can accept it as a valid thing. We live in a world where there's no such thing as facts, everything is subject to our individual preference. Your facts are not my facts. We all invent our own facts as we go along our merry way.

Testable, repeatable, and falsifiable.
 
Top