I have a highly intelligent co-worker who, one day mid-fall, surprisingly started up a political discussion with me. I tend to much straddle the line until I know where my conversation partner stands with respect to politics. Anyway - he was talking about how crazy the protests and riots were during the summer, and this was during the time that Trump was starting to hint about what he would or wouldn't accept given election results. At a certain point he remarked that he thought that if Trump won, there would be likely be more protests and riots from "extreme leftists", but I replied that I thought that it was actually more probable that if Trump lost, there would be some form of violence from the other side. His response was an incredulous and breathy "Really?" I remember having a moment's thought at that time that his opinion must be quite severely influenced by the sway of the media he chooses to listen to. What seemed like an old-hat type of thought to me, based on clear and continual presentation of evidence by Trump himself was received as this improbable, nigh-impossible thing... and yet here we are.
We nearly did have no violence. But the bizarrely
feckless approach to security by Congress, The
Sergeant At Arms, & the Pentagon enabled MAGAs
to explode into the Capitol.
This reminds me of a friend's theory....
Everyone who gets onto the national political stage
must be very very smart. So anything that goes wrong
is intentional. I counter by saying they're just people...
....mere human beings with all the usual failings.
Not all are smart. Not all are thoughtful.
And even smart people make mistakes.
I say the Jan 6 debacle shows vulnerability to incompetence.
Sure, sure, Trump & minions caused it. But they weren't
alone in culpability.