• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Question for all jehovah's witnesses on here

Frank Goad

Well-Known Member
Is lazarus and the rich man just a parable?Because I found this site that says it isn't.:( The site is right here: THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS (Luke 16) IS NOT A PARABLE This confuses me because I thought the dead know nothing when they die.Like in Ecclesiastes 9:5.The reason I was on this site is I like to look at sites that say the spirit survives the death of the body.So I can talk to other jws and understand the other way around.:)
 

cataway

Well-Known Member
Is lazarus and the rich man just a parable?Because I found this site that says it isn't.:( The site is right here: THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS (Luke 16) IS NOT A PARABLE This confuses me because I thought the dead know nothing when they die.Like in Ecclesiastes 9:5.The reason I was on this site is I like to look at sites that say the spirit survives the death of the body.So I can talk to other jws and understand the other way around.:)
just a parable
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
Is lazarus and the rich man just a parable?Because I found this site that says it isn't.:( The site is right here: THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS (Luke 16) IS NOT A PARABLE This confuses me because I thought the dead know nothing when they die.Like in Ecclesiastes 9:5.The reason I was on this site is I like to look at sites that say the spirit survives the death of the body.So I can talk to other jws and understand the other way around.:)

Frank, if you look at the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, you will find it surrounded by other parables.
Matthew 13:34-35...
"All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds by illustrations. Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them, 35 in order to fulfill what was spoken through the prophet who said: “I will open my mouth with illustrations; I will proclaim things hidden since the founding.” (Mark 4:34; Psalm 78:2)

This is not a real life account of real people because, taken literally, it is ridiculous. It means that heaven and hell are within speaking distance to one another.....and that a drop of water can cool someone's tongue in a fire. There is nothing stating that the rich man was wicked, only wealthy, or that the beggar was righteous...only that he ate the crumbs falling from the rich man's table.

The symbolism is this parable are obvious. The rich man represents the Pharisees as a class. The beggar represents the "lost sheep" who were spiritually malnourished because the Pharisees considered them unworthy of their attention, so they merely existed on the spiritual crumbs that fell from their table. Their appeal was to Abraham, not to God, relying on their Jewish heritage rather than on righteous behavior. (Matthew 3:7-10)

Both died and changed places. This "death" is a change in their status. The Pharisees, formerly in "the bosom of Abraham", a position of divine favor, lost God's favor and it was taken away from them and given to the ones who fed off Jesus' teachings and became his disciples.

The drop of cold water was supposed to sooth the ones facing the fiery anger of Jehovah, but a great chasm was fixed which no one could cross, even if they wanted to....meaning that those who stuck to the corrupted Jewish system would never be able to enjoy God's favor again.

The final words of the parable are also very meaningful...after pleading with Abraham to send someone to their brothers to warn them, he said" ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.’”

The scriptures did not convince those religious leaders of Jesus' claim to be their Messiah, and his resurrection did not convince them either....it still doesn't to this day.
 

Frank Goad

Well-Known Member
Frank, if you look at the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, you will find it surrounded by other parables.
Matthew 13:34-35...
"All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds by illustrations. Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them, 35 in order to fulfill what was spoken through the prophet who said: “I will open my mouth with illustrations; I will proclaim things hidden since the founding.” (Mark 4:34; Psalm 78:2)

This is not a real life account of real people because, taken literally, it is ridiculous. It means that heaven and hell are within speaking distance to one another.....and that a drop of water can cool someone's tongue in a fire. There is nothing stating that the rich man was wicked, only wealthy, or that the beggar was righteous...only that he ate the crumbs falling from the rich man's table.

The symbolism is this parable are obvious. The rich man represents the Pharisees as a class. The beggar represents the "lost sheep" who were spiritually malnourished because the Pharisees considered them unworthy of their attention, so they merely existed on the spiritual crumbs that fell from their table. Their appeal was to Abraham, not to God, relying on their Jewish heritage rather than on righteous behavior. (Matthew 3:7-10)

Both died and changed places. This "death" is a change in their status. The Pharisees, formerly in "the bosom of Abraham", a position of divine favor, lost God's favor and it was taken away from them and given to the ones who fed off Jesus' teachings and became his disciples.

The drop of cold water was supposed to sooth the ones facing the fiery anger of Jehovah, but a great chasm was fixed which no one could cross, even if they wanted to....meaning that those who stuck to the corrupted Jewish system would never be able to enjoy God's favor again.

The final words of the parable are also very meaningful...after pleading with Abraham to send someone to their brothers to warn them, he said" ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.’”

The scriptures did not convince those religious leaders of Jesus' claim to be their Messiah, and his resurrection did not convince them either....it still doesn't to this day.

So what part of this website: THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS (Luke 16) IS NOT A PARABLE made you think they got it wrong?Because I still believe in Ecclesiastes 9:5
 

capumetu

Active Member
Is lazarus and the rich man just a parable?Because I found this site that says it isn't.:( The site is right here: THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS (Luke 16) IS NOT A PARABLE This confuses me because I thought the dead know nothing when they die.Like in Ecclesiastes 9:5.The reason I was on this site is I like to look at sites that say the spirit survives the death of the body.So I can talk to other jws and understand the other way around.:)


Who gave the parable Frank? It was none other than Jesus himself sir. Jesus had not died for our sins yet, therefore the first resurrection had not occurred and no one was in heaven at that time other than he that descended, Jesus Jn 3:13; Rev 20:6
 

capumetu

Active Member
Is lazarus and the rich man just a parable?Because I found this site that says it isn't.:( The site is right here: THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS (Luke 16) IS NOT A PARABLE This confuses me because I thought the dead know nothing when they die.Like in Ecclesiastes 9:5.The reason I was on this site is I like to look at sites that say the spirit survives the death of the body.So I can talk to other jws and understand the other way around.:)


Hi Frank, thanks for asking me sir. I just now seen this as I am still learning how to post here. Yes sir, it is a parable, as you are correct the Bible indicates the dead are not conscious, as well as the resurrection has not yet occurred.

It is a relatively easy parable to understand, especially if you look at who it was said for to hear. Jehovah's shepherds had become quite corrupted by Jesus' day, and really had set themselves up in opposition to him. He was letting them know there was going to be a change of circumstances soon, matter of fact he point blank told them the Kingdom would be taken from them, and given to a nation producing it's fruits.

Here is our understanding of what it means sir:
*** jy chap. 88 p. 207 par. 1-p. 209 par. 3 A Change for the Rich Man and for Lazarus ***
“There was a rich man,” Jesus says, “who used to dress in purple and linen, enjoying himself day after day with magnificence. But a beggar named Lazarus used to be put at his gate, covered with ulcers and desiring to be filled with the things dropping from the table of the rich man. Yes, even the dogs would come and lick his ulcers.”—Luke 16:19-21.
The Pharisees are money lovers, so is there any doubt whom Jesus is illustrating by this “rich man”? These Jewish religious leaders also like to deck themselves out in costly, fancy clothing. And beyond whatever actual wealth they might have, they seem rich in the privileges they enjoy and opportunities they have. Yes, illustrating them by a man clothed in royal purple reflects their favored position, and the white linen reflects their self-righteousness.—Daniel 5:7.
How do these rich, proud leaders view the poor, the common people? They contemptuously consider them ‛am ha·’aʹrets, or people of the land (earth), who neither know the Law nor deserve to be taught it. (John 7:49) That reflects the situation of the “beggar named Lazarus,” who hungers for even the meager “things dropping from the table of the rich man.” Like Lazarus covered with ulcers, the common people are looked down on, as if they are spiritually diseased.
That sad situation has existed for some time, but Jesus knows that the time has come for a great change in the condition of both those who are like the rich man and those who are like Lazarus.
THE CHANGE FOR THE RICH MAN AND FOR LAZARUS
Jesus goes on to describe this dramatic change in circumstances. “Now in the course of time,” he says, “the beggar died and was carried off by the angels to Abraham’s side. Also, the rich man died and was buried. And in the Grave he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and he saw Abraham from afar and Lazarus by his side.”—Luke 16:22, 23.
Those listening to Jesus know that Abraham is long dead and in the Grave. The Scriptures make it clear that no one in the Grave, or Sheol, can see or speak, including Abraham. (Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10) What, then, do these religious leaders think that Jesus means with this illustration? What might he be indicating about the common people and the money-loving religious leaders?
Jesus has just pointed to a change by saying that ‘the Law and the Prophets were until John the Baptist, but from then on the Kingdom of God is being declared as good news.’ Hence, it is with the preaching of John and Jesus Christ that both Lazarus and the rich man die to their former circumstances, or condition, and they experience new positions relative to God.
Specifically, those of the humble or poor class have long been spiritually deprived. But they are being helped by and are responding to the message about the Kingdom presented first by John the Baptist and then by Jesus. Formerly, they had to get by with what amounted to little ‘things dropped from the spiritual table’ of the religious leaders. Now they are being fed with essential Scriptural truths, particularly the wonderful things Jesus is explaining. It is as if they finally are in the favored position in the eyes of Jehovah God.
In contrast, those in the rich and influential class of religious leaders refuse to accept the Kingdom message that John proclaimed and that Jesus has been preaching throughout the land. (Matthew 3:1, 2; 4:17) In fact, they are angered, or tormented, by that message, which points to a coming fiery judgment from God. (Matthew 3:7-12) It would be a relief to the money-loving religious leaders if Jesus and his disciples would let up on declaring God’s message. Those leaders are like the rich man in the illustration, who says: “Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am in anguish in this blazing fire.”—Luke 16:24.
But that is not to happen. Most of the religious leaders will not change. They had refused to “listen to Moses and the Prophets,” which writings should have led them to accept Jesus as God’s Messiah and King. (Luke 16:29, 31; Galatians 3:24) Nor do they humble themselves and let themselves be persuaded by those poor ones who accept Jesus and now have divine favor. Jesus’ disciples, for their part, cannot compromise or water down the truth just to satisfy the religious leaders or give them relief. In his illustration, Jesus describes this reality in the words uttered by “Father Abraham” to the rich man:
“Child, remember that you had your fill of good things in your lifetime, but Lazarus for his part received bad things. Now, however, he is being comforted here, but you are in anguish. And besides all these things, a great chasm has been fixed between us and you, so that those who want to go over from here to you cannot, neither may people cross over from there to us.”—Luke 16:25, 26.
How just and fitting it is that such a dramatic change takes place! It amounts to a reversal of position between the proud religious leaders and the humble ones who accept Jesus’ yoke and are finally being refreshed and fed spiritually. (Matthew 11:28-30) This change will be even more evident in a few months when the Law covenant is replaced by the new covenant. (Jeremiah 31:31-33; Colossians 2:14; Hebrews 8:7-13) When God pours out holy spirit on the day of Pentecost 33 C.E., it will be unmistakably clear that, rather than the Pharisees and their religious allies, Jesus’ disciples have God’s favor.

I am so very sorry I just now seen this. Hope this helps sir.
 
Top