• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Problem of Dualism in Atheism and Theism

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member

And you could cure me of that ignorance if you'd just provide a SINGLE example of CONSCIOUSNESS existing without a physical brain. But you either refuse to or you CAN'T. I'm leaning towards the you CAN'T option, because all you responded with was a claim that invertebrates have a nervous system. Just so you know, having a nervous system does NOT equate to possessing consciousness.

Care to try again?
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
And you could cure me of that ignorance if you'd just provide a SINGLE example of CONSCIOUSNESS existing without a physical brain. But you either refuse to or you CAN'T. I'm leaning towards the you CAN'T option, because all you responded with was a claim that invertebrates have a nervous system. Just so you know, having a nervous system does NOT equate to possessing consciousness.

Care to try again?
self denial and delusion are not mine to choose or even enforceable on another
 

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
self denial and delusion are not mine to choose or even enforceable on another

Yet you continue to choose self-denial and delusion by making unsubstantiated claims and refusing to provide any evidence to support them. Clearly if you had an example you would have provided it by now, instead of ignorantly suggesting that possessing a nervous system somehow equates to possessing consciousness.

Again, thanks for playing.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
Yet you continue to choose self-denial and delusion by making unsubstantiated claims and refusing to provide any evidence to support them. Clearly if you had an example you would have provided it by now, instead of ignorantly suggesting that possessing a nervous system somehow equates to possessing consciousness.

Again, thanks for playing.
says the dualist
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
if the universe is not conscious then self is not conscious. self is not greater than the universe.

'Greater'? Who said anything about 'greater'?

the reality is the observer isn't separate from the universe. you can't claim to know something about the universe while ignoring the observer who makes the claim and excludes the self that made it. this is what your typical dualist does. this is what you're doing.

You think I'm a dualist? You think most atheists are dualists? That is laughable. If you're going to throw rocks at us, stick to the broad-brush ones with at least some basis in fact.
The majority of atheists who care to examine such philosophies would subscribe to physicalism, in a philosophical sense. That's a monist theory. Not dualism.

Reality is the universe, self cannot be removed from it. cannot be exclusively objective about it. better to observe the observer than make such a claim of objective observance.

I'm claiming objective observance now?

self can't claim the universe isn't conscious because the observer can see parts of the universe is conscious. there is no way of knowing the whole universe is conscious because self would have to be able to control the universe, be greater than the universe, or be the universe, to know that. that isn't going to happen at a human level.

If you're suggesting that the universe contains a whole lot of stuff I don't know about, then I agree. I'd go further, and state that the universe is made up of a whole lot of stuff you don't know about either.

so yes, the universe is conscious on at least different levels given what we know about consciousness in its many forms on earth.

Different levels? So, are you a pluralist now?
 
Top