• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Did Christ Have An Ego?

Zaha Torte

Active Member
On that final point we'll have to disagree, because I think the fact that the dogmatic Jesus considered physical death to be caused by sin as opposed to chemical decomposition as attested by the fossil record shows His knowledge was manmade not from God, and once one can see that Jesus knowledge did not come from God any more than yours or mine did, the only place left for His claim to be the only way to God to have come from is the human ego.

Therefore in my opinion it is proven Jesus claim is the result of human ego.
Would you mind referencing where Jesus said death came from sin? Are you sure He was not talking about "spiritual death" which is another term for sin?
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
True but I don't say that. I say that Adam and Eve were refused any access to the tree of life in the garden of Eden and so died.
I think you are not taking a detailed biblical summary into account in your marketing. For example in Genesis 5:5 it claims Adam lived 930 years.
That's hardly a natural lifespan for a human of His time subject to the same laws of chemical decomposition as everyone else.
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Would you mind referencing where Jesus said death came from sin? Are you sure He was not talking about "spiritual death" which is another term for sin?
Ah ok, so in your version of the dogmatic Jesus He died on the cross to save us from spiritual death, not physical death. You sound more like a Baha'i than a Christian.
 

Zaha Torte

Active Member
Ah ok, so in your version of the dogmatic Jesus He died on the cross to save us from spiritual death, not physical death. You sound more like a Baha'i than a Christian.
So - you're unable to provide a reference?

I believe that Jesus came into our world to save us from both physical and spiritual death.

He offers a universal redemption from physical death to all through His willing sacrifice and a conditional salvation from sin (spiritual death) by suffering the penalties of our sins.
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
So - you're unable to provide a reference?

I believe that Jesus came into our world to save us from both physical and spiritual death.

He offers a universal redemption from physical death to all through His willing sacrifice and a conditional salvation from sin (spiritual death) by suffering the penalties of our sins.
If He offers universal redemption from physical death, then according to my understanding of the word universal it means for everyone including non-believers in which case we can wait for Jesus to prove that He has the power to resurrect dead people to believe in Him.

But I still think the story makes no sense.
If Jesus death on the cross is to pay for human sin, and physical death has nothing to do with sin but is merely the product of chemical decomposition then Jesus death on the cross won't affect physical death.
 
Last edited:

Brian2

Veteran Member
Prophecies themselves are fake. I think, Jesus as presented in Bible is fake, though there may have been a different real Jesus, a rabbel rouser promising a Jewish kingdom.

Is this conviction because you do not believe in a God and so have closed the door to the possibility of the story of Jesus being true and so the prophecies having been fulfilled?
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
I think you are not taking a detailed biblical summary into account in your marketing. For example in Genesis 5:5 it claims Adam lived 930 years.
That's hardly a natural lifespan for a human of His time subject to the same laws of chemical decomposition as everyone else.

According to the genealogies it is a natural life span at that time but which went down over time till after the flood God said I think 120 years should be more normal and later God dropped it further.
It is not known exactly how long ago Adam lived or exactly how long ago the flood was, but nobody now was alive then to know how long people lived.
Estimates these days could very well be wrong.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Ah ok, so in your version of the dogmatic Jesus He died on the cross to save us from spiritual death, not physical death. You sound more like a Baha'i than a Christian.

Jesus died on the cross to save us from all death, spiritual and physical.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Is this conviction because you do not believe in a God and so have closed the door to the possibility of the story of Jesus being true and so the prophecies having been fulfilled?
Prophecies are ****, and yes, I am a strong atheist, but what I believe about Jesus is because of the history of the region at that time. There were scores of such upstarts showing the 'correct way' and many rebellions against established Jewish authority and Romans. Masada is a prime example. Jesus was just another Rabbel-rouser who failed.
Wikipedia has various lists of people who have claimed to be Moses, Jesus, Imam, Mahdis, Prophets or Saints in Abrahamic religions since no proof is required. The situation is especially bad in Shia Islam. Wiki page on 'Claimants to Mahdis' says:
"According to seminary expert, Mehdi Ghafari, more than 3,000 Mahdi claimants were in prison in Iran in 2012."
This is a sort of Covid in Abrahamic religions. Hinduism too has various 'Bhagwans', Yogis, Swamis. Many of them are criminals and charlatans or they have been propped up by criminals and charlatans.
 
Last edited:

Brian2

Veteran Member
Prophecies are ****, and yes, I am a strong atheist, but what I believe about Jesus is because of the history of the region at that time. Thee were scores of such upstarts showing the 'correct way' and many rebellions against established Jewish authority and Romans. Masada is a prime example. Jesus was just another Rabbel-rouser who failed.
Wikipedia has various lists of people who have claimed to be Moses, Jesus, Imam, Mahdis, Prophets or Saints in Abrahamic religions since no proof is required. The situation is especially bad in Shia Islam. Wiki page on 'Claimants to Mahdis' says:
"According to seminary expert, Mehdi Ghafari, more than 3,000 Mahdi claimants were in prison in Iran in 2012."
This is a sort of Covid in Abrahamic religions. Hinduism too has various 'Bhagwans', Yogis, Swamis. Many of them are criminals and charlatans or they have been propped up by criminals and charlatans.

Yes charlatans and egoists are around in large numbers it seems, but your opinion of Jesus does not seem to be based on the gospels at all, which do not show a rabble rouser, but a teacher of love for enemies who judged only the hypocrisy of the Jewish leaders and the lack of faith of the Jews in the face of His signs and wonders.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Yeah, I don't say that Jesus was a charlatan or criminal. But he sure was trying to foment trouble for the Jewish religious authorities and consequently for Romans too. Perhaps he had some psychological problem due to the circumstances of his birth. He was a small fry - just 12 disciples. So when he was crucified with two thieves, not many cared. Why should my opinion be based on Gospels? Gospels, scriptures always tell a biased story.
 

Zaha Torte

Active Member
If He offers universal redemption from physical death, then according to my understanding of the word universal it means for everyone including non-believers in which case we can wait for Jesus to prove that He has the power to resurrect dead people to believe in Him.
Sure - but you'd miss out on the repentance process which leads to forgiveness of sin. Not to mention the possibility of eventual perfection.

It's better to find this stuff out as soon as possible.

But I still think the story makes no sense.
If Jesus death on the cross is to pay for human sin, and physical death has nothing to do with sin but is merely the product of chemical decomposition then Jesus death on the cross won't affect physical death.
Jesus' suffering was what paid for human sin. And that suffering began in the Garden of Gethsemane when He prayed and bled blood. He suffered for our sins from that moment on until His death on the cross.

Jesus had to die in order to overcome physical death through a glorious bodily Resurrection on that Sunday morning. Because He rose from the dead He promises that all of us will also one day rise from the dead.

He overcame both sin and death and He offers us the possibility to overcome them too. Our victory over physical death is already assured, but our victory over spiritual death (sin) is conditional upon our repentance.
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
According to the genealogies it is a natural life span at that time but which went down over time till after the flood God said I think 120 years should be more normal and later God dropped it further.
It is not known exactly how long ago Adam lived or exactly how long ago the flood was, but nobody now was alive then to know how long people lived.
Estimates these days could very well be wrong.
So you are saying Genesis 5:5 contains a wrong estimate?
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Sure - but you'd miss out on the repentance process which leads to forgiveness of sin. Not to mention the possibility of eventual perfection.
Not really, I could just repent when there is evidence I have something to repent for.

What perfection? Chemical decomposition would continue to work the same as it always has since the first unstable chemicals formed in the universe. Even if Jesus where to bring back all the chemicals together to form a body for us it would still decompose and we would end up as dead as Lazuras from the story currently is... or do you think Lazuras is still around somewhere too?
 

Zaha Torte

Active Member
Not really, I could just repent when there is evidence I have something to repent for.
You believe yourself to be perfect?
What perfection? Chemical decomposition would continue to work the same as it always has since the first unstable chemicals formed in the universe. Even if Jesus where to bring back all the chemicals together to form a body for us it would still decompose and we would end up as dead as Lazuras from the story currently is... or do you think Lazuras is still around somewhere too?
Lazarus was not Resurrected. His spirit was placed back into his mortal body. He eventually died.

A Resurrected body is a perfected body where the spirit and physical body reunite never to be separated again. And it is impervious to the conditions of mortality. No pain, disease or decomposition.

Perfection means becoming like God- also known as exaltation, theosis, or eternal life - and this happens when both our physical bodies and spirituals are perfected in Christ.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Yeah, I don't say that Jesus was a charlatan or criminal. But he sure was trying to foment trouble for the Jewish religious authorities and consequently for Romans too. Perhaps he had some psychological problem due to the circumstances of his birth. He was a small fry - just 12 disciples. So when he was crucified with two thieves, not many cared. Why should my opinion be based on Gospels? Gospels, scriptures always tell a biased story.

He tried to avoid the people making Him into the political King of the Jews that the Jews saw the Messiah to be, with it's implications of war with the Romans and politiical independence etc. The Jewish authorities also saw this potential problem and this seems to have been part of the reason they wanted to get rid of Jesus.
Jesus knew what He had to do and where it would lead, to suffering and death. We can see this in the Gospels. We can also see in the Old Testament prophecies that this is where this suffering servant Messiah would go, that He would be rejected by most Jews and suffer and be killed for the sins of His people.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Not really, I could just repent when there is evidence I have something to repent for.

Really? Do you think you have not done anything wrong?
Maybe you mean evidence that there is someone to repent to, or evidence that there is good reason to repent.

What perfection? Chemical decomposition would continue to work the same as it always has since the first unstable chemicals formed in the universe. Even if Jesus where to bring back all the chemicals together to form a body for us it would still decompose and we would end up as dead as Lazuras from the story currently is... or do you think Lazuras is still around somewhere too?

Lazarus was not resurrected to eternal life with an immortal and incorruptible body.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
We can also see in the Old Testament prophecies that this is where this suffering servant Messiah would go, that He would be rejected by most Jews and suffer and be killed for the sins of His people.
Prophecies again. Braian2, I am living in 21st Century, I do not believe in prophecies. Sins of one person or people cannot be washed by one person.
Actually, that person is responsible for many more sins all over the world.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Prophecies again. Braian2, I am living in 21st Century, I do not believe in prophecies. Sins of one person or people cannot be washed by one person.
Actually, that person is responsible for many more sins all over the world.

The sins of the world can be washed by the sacrifice of one if that one is the Christ, the Son of God. That is prophesied :) and that is what Jesus did.
I cannot see how someone who taught us to love each other and to love God is responsible for the sins of people who do not do what He said.
 
Top