A woman once told me that it's not the size that counts, but what you do with it.
Do you think she was talking about IQ?
Do you think she was talking about IQ?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You seem to be dumbing down all those throughout history who have made contributions to our knowledge, and who most probably were of high intelligence. Expect the masses to have done so?Honestly, most people who are publicly known to have "genius" level IQs (over 140) don't seem to be doing anything amazing with it. They just seem to join egotistical, self-serving MENSA sort of organizations and toot their own horns. Most aren't scientists, scholars or researchers, so who cares what someone's IQ is? They seem to be great at math and engineering but that's mostly it. Even the founder of MENSA complained that so many of the members spend so much of their time solving puzzles and not much else. It doesn't mean anything, least of all that they'll be putting their alleged superior intelligence to good use.
We see similar things with people like Bobby Fischer (chess grandmasters are usually highly intelligent in the same areas that are measured by IQ tests). Great at solving equations and puzzles, but they're not doing much to actually better humanity. I don't see them becoming neuroscientists in droves or following other service oriented careers. Social workers contribute more to society.
You seem to be dumbing down all those throughout history who have made contributions to our knowledge, and who most probably were of high intelligence. Expect the masses to have done so?
...
One correlation that is not mentioned is, students from Catholic and other religious based High Schools consistently test higher, on state and national standard tests, than do their peers in the secular based public High Schools. Even atheist, nonreligious and nondenominational parents, will enroll their children in specific religious high schools for a better education.
One difference has to do with the approach each school type uses in terms of education. The religious schools uses more traditional approaches to education; reading, writing, arithmetic and discipline. The more atheist controlled public high schools, in an attempt to drive out all mention of God and/or appease their agenda of social progressivism, will try to create different methods of teaching, which are not as intuitive or test proven.
What is called cynical atheist intelligence, often leads to change, for the sake of change and/or to appease collective bias, without thinking through the long term implications of their methods. The USA used to test at the top internationally; old school, but now it is in the middle due to being taking over by the self proclaimed intelligent.
When the better educated children from religious schools go off to college, which are run by the same Progressive brain trust that has down graded the public educational system, the sudden dumbing down has an adverse affect, on their once better and more opened minded performance. They have to dumb down or be censored, since free speech is dangerous to indoctrination by the so-called intelligent, who think they know better.
And this thread and others like it implicitly insult people of average intelligence (as far as IQ tests go) who make the great majority of major contributions to humanity but don't get the fame for it, as if people who didn't score high enough on some test are lesser, which is exactly what threads like these imply (they're thinly veiled insults). Acting like you're superior because of your IQ test results is just as stupid as believing you're superior due to skin color, heritage, gender, sexual orientation or any other arbitrary trait that you had little or no control over.You seem to be dumbing down all those throughout history who have made contributions to our knowledge, and who most probably were of high intelligence. Expect the masses to have done so?
PS I didn't join MENSA, even though I passed the entrance test - precisely because I saw no benefit in such.
Illustrates my point very well.
A woman once told me that it's not the size that counts, but what you do with it.
Do you think she was talking about IQ?
PS I didn't join MENSA, even though I passed the entrance test - precisely because I saw no benefit in such
One of the smartest people I ever knewIllustrates my point very well.
That's part of why I don't see the point of gloating about it. It's not really an accomplishment in of itself.One of the smartest people I ever knew
became a clerk type in a library. Not all
have ambition. This is perfectly fine.
Nobody claimed that. When there is a correlation (between A and B) there are 4 possible options.
1. A induces B.
2. B induces A.
3. There is an underlying C that induces A and B.
4. A coincidence that will not show in further studies.
The most likely answer in this case is that high IQ people are more likely to leave religion. "If you're smart, you're more likely to be atheist." doesn't imply "If you leave religion, you are smart (or get smarter)."
Yep.
I've no need to gloat about being betterThat's part of why I don't see the point of gloating about it. It's not really an accomplishment in of itself.
I've no need to gloat about being better
than everyone else. To enjoy it is enuf.
I'm all for it. Each one to their own. You have faith, we have IQ. Everyone has what fits best.
Wait. You find it insulting when we state a simple fact? Do you value IQ more than faith?
Absolutely right. Being smart makes one atheist, not the other way around.
What you really needed was a <insufferably pompous> frubal.Voted it a winner but it deserves a funny almost as much
What you really needed was a <insufferably pompous> frubal.
Offence is taken, never given.And this thread and others like it implicitly insult people of average intelligence (as far as IQ tests go) who make the great majority of major contributions to humanity but don't get the fame for it, as if people who didn't score high enough on some test are lesser, which is exactly what threads like these imply (they're thinly veiled insults). Acting like you're superior because of your IQ test results is just as stupid as believing you're superior due to skin color, heritage, gender, sexual orientation or any other arbitrary trait that you had little or no control over.