• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Right wing terrorist are the #1 threat

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
To rank the threats seems odd.
Why have #1, #2, etc?
Because a teenage delinquent who is into vandalism and property damage isn't nearly as big a threat as terrorist groups operating from within. LW terrorists mostly sabotage pil rigs, raid laboratories, and document footabe while undercover. Its the property damage amd threat tp the economy is why they were the number one threat in the US and UK. Now there is a large presence of RW groups who are out intimidating lawmakers with an armed presence looking over lawmakers from above, raiding federal property, now killing protesters with guns and cars.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Because a teenage delinquent who is into vandalism and property damage isn't nearly as big a threat as terrorist groups operating from within. LW terrorists mostly sabotage pil rigs, raid laboratories, and document footabe while undercover. Its the property damage amd threat tp the economy is why they were the number one threat in the US and UK. Now there is a large presence of RW groups who are out intimidating lawmakers with an armed presence looking over lawmakers from above, raiding federal property, now killing protesters with guns and cars.
The left now seems bent on shooting cops, in addition
to looting, arson, & assault. But I still won't rank them
worse than the rightish violent ones....that would be
counter-productive.
 

Samantha Rinne

Resident Genderfluid Writer/Artist
This is TRUMP's APPOINTEE saying this:

White Supremacists Top Terrorist Threats Within U.S., Wolf Says

President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the agency in charge of curbing domestic terrorism told senators that White supremacists have become the “most persistent and lethal threat” to the U.S. from within the country.

“White supremacist extremists, from a lethality standpoint over the last two years, particularly when you look at 2018 and 2019, are certainly the most persistent and lethal threat when we talk about domestic violent extremists,” said Chad Wolf, who has been heading the Department of Homeland Security in an acting capacity since late last year.

AN EXAMPLE. They claim they're going to respond to attacks and that the police will applaud them and let them murder people. Given what we've seen from some cops, that might be accurate.

Your myopia is rather profound. You know what Trump supporters did during the Obama terms? They worked, they endured, they tried to make the best of things despite eight years of political correctness, historical revisionism, high taxes, and putting America last. Here's a big example.

NYC will fine you $250k for misgendering a transsexual

This at 2015. Imagine living in a city and suddenly having someone who insists they are a xe, or another nonsense babytalk word. You would think a person who is transsexual, you would be okay calling she when they are MtF. Nope, you didn't realize I was a xe, so you should pay me enough to buy a house. Or suppose you meet a transgender woman who looks like this.
transgender-women-first-makeup-product-2.jpg

She's beautiful, and you don't consider her male or anything. But upon finding out, you realize you want a kid, and she will never be able to give that. So you tell her, "I'm sorry but I want to date a woman who can give me a child." She labels you a bigot, in the eyes of the law, you're a homophobe and transphobe, and you are probably liable for the same sort of damages. In fact, during the height of Obama presidency, we had this:

"refusing to date trans ppl is not 'a preference', it's blatant transphobia"

I like women, trans or not. But this isn't something that any sane society would demand people do. People do have preferences. This is oppression. There's also that cake guy who lost a substantial portion of his business because they told him that he must bake a gay cake. Btw, these people could have baked a cake in very gay Massachusetts, but they went out of their way to go to Colorado where there were laws against it (at the time). Can you say, shoving your views down people's throats? And because he didn't want to do gay wedding cakes, in order to be fair, he had to not do any wedding cakes. This cut his business in half, and then after he wins that case in Supreme Court (which took years), not long after he was again accost by someone who wanted a transgender birthday cake. Yes, really.

As mentioned in my profile, I am genderfluid. But after watching someone in my transgender support group intimidate a waitress who was just mixed up, I decided never ever to do that to customers in a library. I go by "he", "she", or "they" even if it's a misgender. Poor woman probably lost her job over it (hello, unemployability and poverty).

Btw, until I was out as transgender, I had zero prospects under liberal rule. Clinton, Bush (actually a RINO, as far as I'm concerned), Obama, all terrible. Recessions and telling me over and over again that nobody wanted me. As a straight white male, I was unessential. And later when I became a conservative trans female, after the election, I was gradually pushed out of the company I worked at. I founded a new business, I worked hard advertising, and I got along with a regular client. I managed about $1100 which seems pathetic, but was good money considering that it was built on a relationship with one person. Now I'm down to about $150 and the lady I work for seems to share my suspicion about all this COVID phobia, but cannot help me, as there is no real money and no real work (I mostly help her on the computer, organizing her pictures of vacations but there's nowhere for her to go). Do you see yet why I make a big fuss about COVID? What I see is not case loads, but loads of impoverished people who have their opportunities taken away while people do "virtual business" and "virtual customer service."

So now, when the situation is reversed and Trump gets elected, do liberals handle this as gracefully? Do they work, try to be entrepreneurs, try to make an honest go of things? No!!! They lost their **** and were screaming at the sky, protesting, burning cars and buildings, and want to impeach a man because reasons.

Worse, the Democratic elites are using and lying to the people spinning all sorts of hysteria. The #NotMyPresident types when asked to explain why they want Trump impeached had no actual answers. In fact, they are on film agreeing with Trump's policies (when they think they are Bernie's or Hillary's)


The media portrays "right wing terrorists" as a thing. But let's examine the big ones.

Remember that "right wing terrorist" who killed people in Vegas? They were attending a concert for country music singer Jason Aldean. Ask yourself. What is the largest demographic for But if he were a liberal and this were a false flag, this would make perfect sense.

The guy who crashed into that woman in Charlottesville? First of all, he had people bash him from behind. Second of all, someone took a screenshot of the guy's plates. So I personally looked up the guy's plates, and you know what I found? They were Ohio plates, meaning this guy drove several states away. But not just that. This wasn't his car. It was borrowed. There was some sort of smokescreen going on, and it didn't smell right, you know?

Many of these people, when reviewing their social media, we actually find liberal posts. So doesn't that mean the #1 threat is actually false flag liberal terrorists? No, but I'll get to that.

How the Left Creates Fake Studies to Fabricate Right-Wing Terrorism

You're being used. It's fine by me if you want to be used. But you ought to know who the actual greatest threat is. These two people.

gates%20face.jpg

This one wants to vaccinate everyone with an untested and probably unsafe vaccine, and has a known track record for making people sick (in India) with botched recipes. He also wants to put a creepy tracking device on every living human. You will lose your freedom.

george-soros-640x480.png

And this man has stirred up nearly every violent protest in recent memory. From Antifa to BLM. And lest you think he is on the side of liberalism, well most of the people he used (and he did use them) lived by the sword and will die likewise, killed in angry riots. They are battering rams. Like with other oppressive regimes, the old guard is always killed when they are no longer useful.

You know what right wing people will do if Trump gets elected again? Go back to work. If Biden gets elected? Try to go back to work, probably fail. The narrative about big bad right-wing terrorists is garbage. It's these two big super elites that are a bigger problem.

xlarge


Once they're done with Christians and conservatives, these lizard people are coming for you next. But we won't be around to say we told you so. So listen now. We need to stand against these elites. To not let this cycle of violence continue. Or this world is doomed. Do not think I say this because I care one iota what happens to you. This is Jonah telling Ninevah that if it doesn't change its ways, they are screwed. If you do manage to avert things, I'll still hate you guys.
 
Last edited:

Tambourine

Well-Known Member
I must elaborate on your question.
There is a spectrum....
- Unforeseeable accidents
- Foreseeable accidents.
- Recklessness
- Intentional harm

The above should see escalating levels of accountability & sanction.
Moreover, the victim's being either innocent or threat affects things.
My post, which you responded to but apparently did not read, exclusively talked about shooting innocent people.

I find it kind of sad when people are seemingly so attached to their political alignment that they can't even bring themselves to straight up agree with demands so fundamentally reasonable as "police officers should face consequences for killing innocent people".
 

Tambourine

Well-Known Member
Read carefully.
I addressed it.
You want a simple answer to a complex question.
I don't play that.
I wanted to know whether you agree that shooting innocent people is actually bad.

But apparently, not wanting innocent lives snuffed out is actually politically controversial these days.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I wanted to know whether you agree that shooting innocent people is actually bad.

But apparently, not wanting innocent lives snuffed out is actually politically controversial these days.
I gave you a great answer.
You either didn't understand it or ignored it.
But I detect no desire to actually discuss the issue,
& suspect mischief in your phrasing & inferences.
 

Tambourine

Well-Known Member
"Killing innocent people is bad" - a mischief maker who wants to ensnare people into their socialist belief system
 
Last edited:

Scott C.

Just one guy
I think the shooter(s) should not be persecuted. When cops aren't persecuted for shooting citizens, citizens shouldn't be persecuted for shooting cops.

Did you just say that people should be able to murder policemen without prosecution? Please say I misunderstand.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
Did you just say that people should be able to murder policemen without prosecution? Please say I misunderstand.
Why is that a shock? They kill innocent people all the time and get away with it. Why are cops allowed to be above the law and basic humanity?
 
Top