Btw there are more American soldiers than Italian ones here...I didn't understand who should attack whom...
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do the Axis Powers Have a Moral Obligation to Attack the US?
- Thread starter Heyo
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #just wars
MNoBody
Well-Known Member
let's see, war on poverty, war on drugs, war on the homeless, war against the indigenous, etc......seems the US is pretty consistent in their endless war on the people who are all deemed as the unincarcerated [and terrorists] by the judiciary.....hmmm what to make of that?As for Italia and Deutschland, we are de facto US military colonies since 1945 so the US cannot declare war on themselves....
Ok...but speaking of the thread topic...any US President is ok to me...as long as he preserves the peace of the Mediterranean area.
Last edited:
As for Italia and Deutschland, we are de facto US military colonies since 1945 so the US cannot declare war on themselves....
Same with Japan. The Japanese aren't even allowed to have a standing military, for as long as we are in a treaty with them. They have a "Self Defense Force" to protect their interest; the rest of their military might comes from our stationed troops.
Edit: Under Article 9 of the 1947 constitution, which was written by Prime Minister Kijūrō Shidehara under the supervision of the SCAP[19], Japan forever renounces war as an instrument for settling international disputes and declared that Japan will never again maintain "land, sea, or air forces or another war potential."
Japan Self-Defense Forces - Wikipedia
oldbadger
Skanky Old Mongrel!
No, no more than I think the US should be the protector of democracy for the rest of the world. I'd rather the US stay out of other country's internal affairs and vice versa.
Ameristan.
But this "we" wouldn't personally include me.
I'm a lover, not a fighter.
And I'm not even a lover.
I guess you could say I'm a conscientious objector of everything.
That's why they'd be so easy to defeat.
And we'd be on home territory.
I doubt they could survive without bidets & traffic circles everywhere.
Heyo
Veteran Member
Those are minor problems (OK, maybe not for the French) but we need a working field bakery with a supply of different sorts of flour and, most important, a constant supply of drinkable beer.
exchemist
Veteran Member
Well, I'm pleased to see Mitch McConnell has tried to inject a modicum of sense into things, at least. I just hope they don't play silly buggers with interminable legal challenges to the result.
Btw there are more American soldiers than Italian ones here...I didn't understand who should attack whom...
View attachment 43139
Well, if things really get that bad in the U.S., then I'd imagine they'd have to withdraw most of our overseas forces to deal with problems closer to home.
In my neck of the woods, just finding water would be difficult. You'd need to resurrect General Rommel, the Desert Fox, since he knew how to fight in the desert.
Uh oh....we have those.
We are speaking of hypothethical situations...btw.
In reality ...with all the turmoils in the Middle East...we should have more US/NATO bases...not less.
One feels safer.
Heyo
Veteran Member
I don't feel safer near aggressive powers led by simple minded people. I have cheered the reduction of US troops in Germany and I'd like them all gone.We are speaking of hypothethical situations...btw.
In reality ...with all the turmoils in the Middle East...we should have more US/NATO bases...not less.
One feels safer.
In fact Germany is in a privileged geographical position.
Heyo
Veteran Member
Yep. But that has not always been the case. (Well the geographical position has always been favourable, but the geopolitical position has changed a lot.)In fact Germany is in a privileged geographical position.
Yes, indeed... when the Americans liberated us, they promised us they would always protect us and defend us.
We are speaking of hypothethical situations...btw.
In reality ...with all the turmoils in the Middle East...we should have more US/NATO bases...not less.
One feels safer.
Maybe, although I don't know if any Middle Eastern country or faction has the wherewithal to launch an invasion of Italy or any other country in Europe. Those forces were put there in the first place to defend against a hypothetical Soviet invasion, but there's no chance of that ever happening.
Tambourine
Well-Known Member
And they did! They even funded fascist underground terrorist cells in case the communists ever took over.
Operation Gladio - Wikipedia