Nimos
Well-Known Member
As others have asked, how exactly would that be harmful. But also it is purely a wrong statementHarm is.. missing the possibility of God's existence, IF he really exists.
If God exist, a non believer would experience God just as much as a believer would. I don't see religious people running around all ecstatic claiming that they have been cured by God or that their life is so much better. The first thing a believer does when they get sick is to run to the hospital, shouldn't they run to the churches instead? (Which is good that they do, by the way) But I find it a bit hypocritical to point out non believing as being harmful and to miss out on God, because they rely on other humans for their wellbeing, but the moment the **** hits the fan, the believers choose the non believers solutions rather than their own so called "non harmful" way.
IF God really exist as you state then isn't it to spit in his face not to rely on him for help and salvation rather than some poor schmuck of a doctor, which is only human?