• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is source of human good qualities?

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
evolution is a process, like combustion or any transformative alchemical process
so are you suggesting that clay can of itself become a pot?
all fired and glazed and running around pouring tea of its own volition's?
Imagine if creationists put as much effort into understanding science as they put into making up ridiculous versions of phenomena they don't understand.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
Imagine if creationists put as much effort into understanding science as they put into making up ridiculous versions of phenomena they don't understand.

Oh they did. Maybe you should put as much effort into understanding things too. Its great to put all your effort into science. But when you do, dont make just rhetorical comments in an area you have not put effort into.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Oh they did. Maybe you should put as much effort into understanding things too. Its great to put all your effort into science. But when you do, dont make just rhetorical comments in an area you have not put effort into.
The mind boggles....
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
In our view, human has 2 natures. A nature which is spiritual, and a nature which is related to our physical body. There is always a battle between Spirit and the physical body. The physical body, by itself is a selfish. It has certain needs and wants. It has to eat, want to have sex, is greedy with regards to material world, is greedy about power, wealth. On the other hand, the Spirit is only source of good. Loving, kindness, forgiveness, fairness,..., all come from Spirit. Thus, the Spirit is in a war with the physical body. Now, humans do not have equal spiritual powers. We can have a strong Spirit, or weak spirit. Depending on the Spiritual strength, it could win or loose to the selfish desires of the physical body. If the Spirit is strong, it takes control over the selfish desires, then, we manifest more spiritual qualities, such as kindness, generosity, forgiveness, and selfless acts. But, if Spirit is weak, then the physical body takes control. We then show, more selfishness, less generosity, less truthfulness, more greed and lust, more cruelty even. It is possible to strengthen the spirit, through certain practices.
Pretty good summary of a couple of chapters of the epistle to the Romans. But in Romans, we actually are told to choose to walk in the Spirit instead of the 'flesh' (as you termed the 'body'). It's a choice we are able to make, from this view. But that choice during a difficult moment needs an aid.

 

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
Pretty good summary of a couple of chapters of the epistle to the Romans. But in Romans, we actually are told to choose to walk in the Spirit instead of the 'flesh' (as you termed the 'body'). It's a choice we are able to make, from this view. But that choice during a difficult moment needs an aid.
a choice is only as good as one's awareness of it.
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
yet, before the law, the typical platitude is that ignorance, is no excuse....implying that whomever ought to have known enough to check first before leaping and if they didn't, it is impugned that they kind of deserve the results...which is the harshness of the injustice of opinion people typically find in the world of men.
yet one lacking awareness of "a choice", really had no choice before them to make which they were aware of.
subjective ignorance
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
yet, before the law, the typical platitude is that ignorance, is no excuse....implying that whomever ought to have known enough to check first before leaping and if they didn't, it is impugned that they kind of deserve the results...which is the harshness of the injustice of opinion people typically find in the world of men.
Humans tend to be less Just and Merciful than God, one gets the impression, from a full reading (as opposed to partial) of scriptures.

yet one lacking awareness of "a choice", really had no choice before them to make which they were aware of.
subjective ignorance

One thing not so widely known, since it requires a much more full reading of scriptures --

"For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. After being made alive, d he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— to those who were disobedient long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built...." (1rst epistle of Peter chapter 3) where we get the impression this means to all of the dead (illustrated by this prominent instance of all the people on Earth at that time but the righteous Noah and his family and in laws) that had not heard the gospel and might be willing to hear. In other words, it seems a universal chance for those not having had a chance.
 

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
Humans tend to be less Just and Merciful than God, one gets the impression, from a full reading (as opposed to partial) of scriptures.



One thing not so widely known, since it requires a much more full reading of scriptures --

"For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. After being made alive, d he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— to those who were disobedient long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built...." (1rst epistle of Peter chapter 3) where we get the impression this means to all of the dead (illustrated by this prominent instance of all the people on Earth at that time but the righteous Noah and his family and in laws) that had not heard the gospel and might be willing to hear. In other words, it seems a universal chance for those not having had a chance.
these universal principles sure get anthropomorphized,
like people have an inside scoop thereby into the thoughts and intents [secret reasonings and purposes]
of the "Universal-Intelligence" {for them in specific, and everyone else, generally}and its paternal patience.....
nice depiction and very evocative, if one is looking for pie in the sky in the sweet by and by,
more mysterious opiates for the masses, doled out at mass, enmass every 7-day.
which is a nice story, for children....shouldn't the kids have grown more demonstrably by now?
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
these universal principles sure get anthropomorphized,
like people have an inside scoop thereby into the thoughts and intents [secret reasonings and purposes]
of the "Universal-Intelligence" {for them in specific, and everyone else, generally}and its paternal patience.....
nice depiction and very evocative, if one is looking for pie in the sky in the sweet by and by,
more mysterious opiates for the masses, doled out at mass, enmass every 7-day.
which is a nice story, for children....shouldn't the kids have grown more demonstrably by now?
If you meant that those touting an outright universal salvation, I agree.

Instead, we hear there are definite criteria, and some will gain Life and many will not. For example a key one I was just pointing out a few minutes ago, as shown throughout scripture:
Psalm 138:6; Proverbs 3:34; Proverbs 29:23; Matthew 23:12; Luke 1:52; James 4:6; 1 Peter 5:5
 

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
If you meant that those touting an outright universal salvation, I agree.

Instead, we hear there are definite criteria, and some will gain Life and many will not. For example a key one I was just pointing out a few minutes ago, as shown throughout scripture:
Psalm 138:6; Proverbs 3:34; Proverbs 29:23; Matthew 23:12; Luke 1:52; James 4:6; 1 Peter 5:5
which all depict a process which jeopardizes ones absolute state of being, just by being involved, therefore, do the work or else, same pattern as the former category, in essence.
same valuation scale being applied as motivational aid for slothful 'children', from appearances.
if the ends are the same, what matter the means?
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
which all depict a process which jeopardizes ones absolute state of being, just by being involved, therefore, do the work or else, same pattern as the former category, in essence.
same valuation scale being applied as motivational aid for slothful 'children', from appearances.
if the ends are the same, what matter the means?
I'll be happy to discuss with you if you like, but I was not able to guess what you mean. You are using too few words or assuming I'll guess too many things. What 'process' do you mean? What is one's 'absolute state of being' such that it could be 'jeopardized', and how? 'Involved' in what/how? Do what 'work'? What 'pattern'? and What 'category'? Also the whole 2nd paragraph a-z.
 

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
I'll be happy to discuss with you if you like, but I was not able to guess what you mean. You are using too few words or assuming I'll guess too many things. What 'process' do you mean? What is one's 'absolute state of being' such that it could be 'jeopardized', and how? 'Involved' in what/how? Do what 'work'? What 'pattern'? and What 'category'? Also the whole 2nd paragraph a-z.
hmm....
where to begin then.
process, the proposed alchemical [transformative] great work of all spiritual traditions which is the central focus of a religious/spiritual forum, lots of paths to the same end, one camp says it must be done this way or end in disaster, others are of distinctly different mind regarding the same work with the same end result. [generally speaking]
the 'absolute' state of being would be this quality which all spiritual traditions speak of, the immortal nature of the soul and its journey to some necessary goal through this life with an object in mind to attain to [nirvana, eternal life, heaven, perfected self, etc] the part which the theists say gets judged for its performance here in the material.
and this is always depicted in the manner that it could be something a person could and most likely will utterly fail at, which jeopardizes the 'status' of this immortal soul which gets assessed after its life's work, to see how it all holds up under intense perfect scrutiny....
this is some rudimentary elementary concepts....this is really abbreviated and very generalized.
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
hmm....
where to begin then.
process, the proposed alchemical [transformative] great work of all spiritual traditions which is the central focus of a religious/spiritual forum, lots of paths to the same end, one camp says it must be done this way or end in disaster, others are of distinctly different mind regarding the same work with the same end result. [generally speaking]
the 'absolute' state of being would be this quality which all spiritual traditions speak of, the immortal nature of the soul and its journey to some necessary goal through this life with an object in mind to attain to [nirvana, eternal life, heaven, perfected self, etc] the part which the theists say gets judged for its performance here in the material.
and this is always depicted in the manner that it could be something a person could and most likely will utterly fail at, which jeopardizes the 'status' of this immortal soul which gets assessed after its life's work, to see how it all holds up under intense perfect scrutiny....
this is some rudimentary elementary concepts....this is really abbreviated and very generalized.
Sure, that's familiar stuff. Mythos has always been interesting, and I've listened plenty to Joseph Campbell, read a range of things (even Jung), and so on. Not a bit is new to me there in what you just wrote. :)

One could simply try things out. I did, very widely, extensively.
 

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
Sure, that's familiar stuff. Mythos has always been interesting, and I've listened plenty to Joseph Campbell, read a range of things (even Jung), and so on. Not a bit is new to me there in what you just wrote. :)

One could simply try things out. I did, very widely, extensively.
that is the great work..
like in masonic tradition one may be speculative or operative as a modality of function..... antipodes, the extremes need to be pushed at to expand the envelope, the alchemist cannot merely read about things and imagine it, one must do the practicum in their own lab so to speak.....
trouble with speaking of the things invisible is that they resemble no visible thing so how may we speak of it at all.....newton devised calculus to assist, but it is patently beyond most [statistically speaking]
the alchemists and all that gang have special argot, slang, nomenclature, cant, etc, to speak in which is the calculus, so to speak of the parables and all those 'weird' stories.
hearers, or doers..... seems the lot of who-mans who still don't really know who they really are.
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
that is the great work..
like in masonic tradition one may be speculative or operative as a modality of function..... antipodes, the extremes need to be pushed at to expand the envelope, the alchemist cannot merely read about things and imagine it, one must do the practicum in their own lab so to speak.....
trouble with speaking of the things invisible is that they resemble no visible thing so how may we speak of it at all.....newton devised calculus to assist, but it is patently beyond most [statistically speaking]
the alchemists and all that gang have special argot, slang, nomenclature, cant, etc, to speak in which is the calculus, so to speak of the parables and all those 'weird' stories.
hearers, or doers..... seems the lot of who-mans who still don't really know who they really are.
There was so much interesting theory, such as Jung's typology (which is a whole book he spent 10 years on, but also has been evolved since into much clearer and briefer descriptions), and how Campbell talked of myths in practice in life, I was also interested in just gains for living life well, and increasingly, since there's no end to theory, I was all about testing ideas out. Not just ideas as theories, but practical ways to live better. So, I increasingly tried a lot of different things, often for many hours each and some for hundreds of hours.
 

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
There was so much interesting theory, such as Jung's typology (which is a whole book he spent 10 years on, but also has been evolved since into much clearer and briefer descriptions), and how Campbell talked of myths in practice in life, I was also interested in just gains for living life well, and increasingly, since there's no end to theory, I was all about testing ideas out. Not just ideas as theories, but practical ways to live better. So, I increasingly tried a lot of different things, often for many hours each and some for hundreds of hours.
gotta keep knocking on heaven's door....one should knock as if they know the king
so to sing.
 
Top