Terry Sampson
Well-Known Member
I was thinking of introducing a cartoon that I like with a comment. To do so, I searched my memory and the word "apropos" came up, but to make sure that I had a grasp of the meaning of that word, I googled for a "definition" of it and this popped up:
Oddly enough, I had decided that my comment would end with the words: "Nothing in particular." After getting the definitions above, I found myself puzzled. Why?
Because if my complete comment is: "Apropos nothing in particular" and by "apropos" I mean: "With reference to or concerning nothing in particular", my comment satisfies my goal. But if I mean: "Very appropriate to a particular situation, i.e. nothing in particular" my comment seems to be an oxymoron which makes my comment seem odd and silly. Ergo, the reason for my puzzlement.
Here, again, is my proposed comment:
Apropos nothing in particular.
And here's the cartoon that I wanted to introduce:
Question: Is my proposed comment satisfactory or odd and silly?
Oddly enough, I had decided that my comment would end with the words: "Nothing in particular." After getting the definitions above, I found myself puzzled. Why?
Because if my complete comment is: "Apropos nothing in particular" and by "apropos" I mean: "With reference to or concerning nothing in particular", my comment satisfies my goal. But if I mean: "Very appropriate to a particular situation, i.e. nothing in particular" my comment seems to be an oxymoron which makes my comment seem odd and silly. Ergo, the reason for my puzzlement.
Here, again, is my proposed comment:
Apropos nothing in particular.
And here's the cartoon that I wanted to introduce:
Question: Is my proposed comment satisfactory or odd and silly?