• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

An open challenge to evolutionists.

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Reading of a book, a human makes a quote that says and Jesus proved that man and woman existed!

Is about where life has evolved to, males claiming that reading of information tells them everything that they needed to know, as if everyday life had not already advised them.

That sort of human mentality that gets us all destroyed.

A human cannot be discussed in relativity as a concept that precedes a human, for you personally are not there either, yet your ego motivates your belief to pretend that you can make these claims consciously.

Rationality says, you know that animals preceded our human bio life as a bio nature, and they do not in rationality advise you of scientific precepts or concepts only owned and studied and researched by a human.

So then family humanity has to bring to the scientists attention, that his self, his self in an extended group of like minds, that we taught was cult behaviour, not natural family or natural group behaviour is our destroyer.

By placating self presence in his own idealisation of self yet inferring all other detail as just data, of non natural and physical reality of natural bodies in their natural presence, just because his self and his group self gives that group permission to think in this form, with the claim that self is a form of God and superiority that would survive as a full and owned completed self and body, whilst looking at all other detail in miniscule separated and separation themes.

As the highest and holiest self presence, natural body and natural form as the idealisation of self being some form of a God in the sciences as a Designer of artificial mimicry for his own civilization controls and inventions for self gain.

As the realisation challenge, why is self, present, in the moment, fully owned, conceived by 2 human being parents, not their own life, or bodies cannot use their consciousness in thinking correctly.

But enforce such evil separation and destructive beliefs to the body by their thinking capability of very small, minute information as if they can successfully miniaturise everything else to just what they study? For that is the intention rationally.

For the cosmology is in fact owner of the ANTI of our existence by the mass of the forces that you conclude is a comparative beginning of our end.

We do not live with those forces, we are kept safe from those forces that science calls laws in the cosmos.
 

Secret Chief

nirvana is samsara
Oh, this is easy.
I can identify both.

1) Self-drilling self-tapping flat head #2 phillips 1/4-20 machine screw
It's an unusual variant of a flat head because the larger head diameter is more like a truss head.

2) #2 phillips head screwdriver
That's very impressive. Do you do after dinner speeches?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Send me your business card. :D
s-l300.jpg
 

dad

Undefeated
Reading of a book, a human makes a quote that says and Jesus proved that man and woman existed!
Or we could read a post of some ignoramus that has no way of knowing either way, but wants to try and disallow God.



Rationality says, you know that animals preceded our human bio life as a bio nature,
Rationality says nothing of the kind.


As the highest and holiest self presence, natural body and natural form as the idealisation of self being some form of a God
God is not about self anything.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Or we could read a post of some ignoramus that has no way of knowing either way, but wants to try and disallow God.



Rationality says nothing of the kind.



God is not about self anything.
If you quote self to be the ignoramus, ignoring relevant information as fact, such as living only due to a stone planet existing first and origin and ONE, and that males named that body God and ST ONE...claiming ST is a shortened version in the WORD for a S AIN T and AIN meant 0, then it must surely be you scientist.

One, where he withdrew energy and power held and fixed that enabled him to personally manipulate it as a physical condition. One body O stone, first and owned its own heavenly mass. O concept of the spirit circular movement in light burning first cooling second....God he claims O spiralling into a symbol, seeing science uses symbolism in text teaching G back into O and then O splits into D/D.

Gives D a letter a number value of 500 and says 500 and 500 is Christ and Satan themes 1000. And you want to claim I am lying in a very snide statement?

Dinosaurs says science is an animal and it lived before we did....proof that animals lived before we did as living.

If you want to claim that dead humans once lived before dinosaurs then those dead humans sure did. Maybe you think a dead human is an alien.
 

dad

Undefeated
If you quote self to be the ignoramus, ignoring relevant information as fact, such as living only due to a stone planet existing first and origin and ONE, and that males named that body God and ST ONE...claiming ST is a shortened version in the WORD for a S AIN T and AIN meant 0, then it must surely be you scientist.

One, where he withdrew energy and power held and fixed that enabled him to personally manipulate it as a physical condition. One body O stone, first and owned its own heavenly mass. O concept of the spirit circular movement in light burning first cooling second....God he claims O spiralling into a symbol, seeing science uses symbolism in text teaching G back into O and then O splits into D/D.

Gives D a letter a number value of 500 and says 500 and 500 is Christ and Satan themes 1000. And you want to claim I am lying in a very snide statement?

Dinosaurs says science is an animal and it lived before we did....proof that animals lived before we did as living.

If you want to claim that dead humans once lived before dinosaurs then those dead humans sure did. Maybe you think a dead human is an alien.
OK, sorry about your language problem, or comprehension deficit or whatever it is. Work on that blather posting.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
OK, sorry about your language problem, or comprehension deficit or whatever it is. Work on that blather posting.
Such kind Christian thinking, no wonder humanity does not believe in you.

You brother, scientist/Satanist, occultist history, said God was 10.

Said 0 was AIN and then tried to work out the removal of God by claiming
10000000000000000000 by whatever mass value you thought was relevant.

God by constant presence would constantly quote 10101010101010101010 never ending, with a meaning spatial zero frozen radiation attack, by spatial vacuum, placed Earth in a held and fixed O cycle, protected by the spatial seal and the seal of the Earth face, the stone.

Science as a psyche says as a male the UFO mass in its highest form has some form of realisation according to life. Which if you discuss science would mean, do not heat it up and remove it, the seal in space in the Heavens, or else the spatial vacuum will rip you apart.

That kind of relevant male preaching that is totally ignored by the males who quoted the importance of the spirit and its natural presence.

I know my Father is the God self, for he owned all human male themes about consciously discussing in his highest body life form science. Then when science was activated it was when the male life lost half of his ground water mass use in his bio life form. Where the precept of a spirit of self became form separate from self for doing evil, being the UFO occult radiation seal conversion.

I have heard that spirit body speak and it maintains a reality of trying to teach our aware self of how wrong science is, the history of its abuses. And spiritual humanity think of the recording in a water mass to be of a spiritual being and purpose, whereas if no science was implemented we would re inherit that spirit body of water within our own bio bodies and transform spiritually into a healthier and more conscious life.

As a female my spiritual awareness once said that I had been saving my Father. I thought about that comment, seeing I had many correct spirit statements said in my psyche. I thought, yes, male babies are given back their human life by females, but who was my Father spiritually. It was how I learnt the story of what is inferred to be the male God self, spiritually.

Father has spoken to me many times, so I learnt from experience not to try to equate self human to being some form of supernatural power, but realise what phenomena and cause and effect meant in an artificial science choice and practice that forcibly had changed natural.

The evolution challenge is not any challenge in reality. For anyone with common sense would state that if ICE implemented gas cooling when ICE never existed before held on the Earth body, then we would have been proven to have lived once before a long time ago and had our lives returned and healed due to the atmospheric body, the spirit of returning.

How the relativity of both evolution and journey of our spirit was once taught.
 

dad

Undefeated
Such kind Christian thinking, no wonder humanity does not believe in you.

You brother, scientist/Satanist, occultist history, said God was 10.

Said 0 was AIN and then tried to work out the removal of God by claiming
10000000000000000000 by whatever mass value you thought was relevant.

God by constant presence would constantly quote 10101010101010101010 never ending, with a meaning spatial zero frozen radiation attack, by spatial vacuum, placed Earth in a held and fixed O cycle, protected by the spatial seal and the seal of the Earth face, the stone.

Science as a psyche says as a male the UFO mass in its highest form has some form of realisation according to life. Which if you discuss science would mean, do not heat it up and remove it, the seal in space in the Heavens, or else the spatial vacuum will rip you apart.

That kind of relevant male preaching that is totally ignored by the males who quoted the importance of the spirit and its natural presence.

I know my Father is the God self, for he owned all human male themes about consciously discussing in his highest body life form science. Then when science was activated it was when the male life lost half of his ground water mass use in his bio life form. Where the precept of a spirit of self became form separate from self for doing evil, being the UFO occult radiation seal conversion.

I have heard that spirit body speak and it maintains a reality of trying to teach our aware self of how wrong science is, the history of its abuses. And spiritual humanity think of the recording in a water mass to be of a spiritual being and purpose, whereas if no science was implemented we would re inherit that spirit body of water within our own bio bodies and transform spiritually into a healthier and more conscious life.

As a female my spiritual awareness once said that I had been saving my Father. I thought about that comment, seeing I had many correct spirit statements said in my psyche. I thought, yes, male babies are given back their human life by females, but who was my Father spiritually. It was how I learnt the story of what is inferred to be the male God self, spiritually.

Father has spoken to me many times, so I learnt from experience not to try to equate self human to being some form of supernatural power, but realise what phenomena and cause and effect meant in an artificial science choice and practice that forcibly had changed natural.

The evolution challenge is not any challenge in reality. For anyone with common sense would state that if ICE implemented gas cooling when ICE never existed before held on the Earth body, then we would have been proven to have lived once before a long time ago and had our lives returned and healed due to the atmospheric body, the spirit of returning.

How the relativity of both evolution and journey of our spirit was once taught.
Righty then.
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
Or, did man create Gods?
Many. We know at least very many. Why? As a non believer I found Joseph Campbell's explanation more compelling than the psychological ones, and better than Jung also.
As I think of that answer now -- why so many gods were created by men -- I think one key motive is the desire to better get in touch with the ineffable, and this is so universal because the ineffable is real. They typically fall short and often only end up with just a human energy.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Or we could read a post of some ignoramus that has no way of knowing either way, but wants to try and disallow God.



Rationality says nothing of the kind.



God is not about self anything.
All this time and you still don't know how claims work?
Come on.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Yes, we know. We simply read what you say about what a claim is, and pretend we have some clear definition.
Sorry, I don't understand what this means.

What you do is make claims and assert them as facts without ever demonstrating them, while expecting others to disprove them. That's not how the burden of proof works, as you should well know by now.
 

dad

Undefeated
Sorry, I don't understand what this means.

What you do is make claims and assert them as facts without ever demonstrating them, while expecting others to disprove them. That's not how the burden of proof works, as you should well know by now.
What you do is show an inability to defend your beliefs and science claims. So you try to shift focus with blather and false charges.
 

GardenLady

Active Member
for you personally are not there either, yet your ego motivates your belief to pretend that you can make these claims consciously.

This reminds me of the YEC pentacostal church my college roommate joined, where they taught congregants and school children to say "Were you there?" in response to pretty much any scientific statement about the past they didn't like.

Let's say you walk along the beach and there are footprints in the sand. Would you not conclude that someone was there before you? Let's say you drive by a forest and the trees are all burned. Would you not conclude that there was a forest fire? Let's say we meet and you see that my husband had a vertical scar on his chest over his sternum. Would you not suspect, at least enough to gather further evidence, that he'd had open heart surgery?

The earth is full of evidence of the past, geologically, biologically, etc.. So it doesn't matter if we personally were not there.
 
Top