something on my mind

I heard paul wrote alot of the bible.If this is true how much did he right?

Not sure Paul 'wrote' any of the Bible. His letters to other budding Christian communities is what you find in the New Testament. The is some speculation that most of these epistles were written by Titus, Paul's right hand man.

Frank Goad said:

I heard paul wrote alot of the bible.If this is true how much did he right?

Click to expand...

there are a couple that some think that maybe he didn't while others think he did... the Books that are attributed are:

Romans, 1 ad 2 Corinthians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Philemon, Titus, Hebrews, (this one is under discussion but generally considered to be from him), Galatians, Ephesians, Colossians and Philippians,

It was not unusual for Bible writers to have scribes. These merely acted as as secretaries recording a prophet's words. Paul may have used a scribe because he apparently had a problem with his eyesight.

Deeje said:

It was not unusual for Bible writers to have scribes. These merely acted as as secretaries recording a prophet's words. Paul may have used a scribe because he apparently had a problem with his eyesight.

Click to expand...

Had that Springsteen Syndrome...you know "...he was blinded by the light...". (Sorry, quarantined too, too long.)

BSM1 said:

Had that Springsteen Syndrome...you know "...he was blinded by the light...". (Sorry, quarantined too, too long.)

Click to expand...

That may well have been at the base of his problem.....

If you have a problem with your eyesight, and you wear glasses and then lose them, your eyesight has gone with them.....Paul never had the benefit of glasses.....but he referred to a letter that he wrote with his own hand and described them as having large letters (Galatians 6:11)......something a person with bad eyesight might do.....
He also suggested at Galatians 4:15 that some may well have gouged out their own eyes to give to him....also indicating that his eyesight was not good.

I call 'em as I see 'em....

Writing a thesis that is said to be heard is proven in the like lives of Nostradamus to be prophetic probability of scientific causes.

As known and understood by humans as humans living as humans, said by humans, and the origin of which was male group cult brother humans.

Group mentality and group agreement yet the one self if just living as one self never would have invented science.

As a true human fact.

So as male humans invented all references to science as humans on and for in presence of humans...then they did. No body else is spruiking human science information except for humans.

When a male says to his own self....I know today that RNA/DNA is on a meteorite....didn't the meteorite have to come into our gas mass...with water oxygen and lots of Earth microbes to be slowed and cooled before it hit?

And then have those males claim that DNA/RNA by itself can talk like a human as if it is self identified as consciousness...as said and stated by a fully life human owned speaker with consciousness....and then natural humans wonder at his arrogance?

For I do….lots of males, lots of studied and interacted talked about and discussed information and lots of variations to self experiences. So lots of different males in all world communities today will variations to DNA and also personal health speak about science awareness as males/or scientists.

Yet science always said to science, science you are wrong...as one exact human owned relative truth, yet today you still all want to ignore the fact that science and its practice was told it was wrong...and then you proved it.

By living owning DNA/bio o life cell as a male and prophet, probability thinker to calculate male reasoning into a future date to claim and in that future, my own scientist self will no longer exist in human life for having caused so many future spatial attacks on the planet of Earth for having tried to copy original theme.

Sun to Earth UFO mass removal. So my first science theory was based on nothing by extra irradiation in the gas mass atmosphere with physical stone mass removed....so my claim is conscious awareness of that information, exactly as stated in that awareness....as Earth science relativity.

Yet today I still have to lie about the after the fact detailing of previous historic attacks, that I correlated lots of data and lots of books into one of two books, to correlate that ADAM 0 in the past BC was destroyed as 0 AD AM in the future was also destroyed...proving historically I am a liar as a Satanic coercer.

Frank Goad said:

I heard paul wrote alot of the bible.If this is true how much did he right?

Click to expand...

Not my Bible.

Frank Goad said:

I heard paul wrote alot of the bible.If this is true how much did he right?

Click to expand...

Dunno if he wrote a lot of them literally but I am pretty confident that he at least dictated the words for another to write. There are too many nuances in the language, like random references to others as if the people know what he is talking about, greetings to others as if he has a personal connection with them and references to his own life as if people knew him. I think he wrote 13 books.

Saul had a lot of imagination !

Ahhhhh....and ....the cross....?

He didn't see that one coming !

If you ever read any history, a historian is not necessarily an eyewitness. He's a gatherer of testimonies supposedly from eyewitness accounts. So is a reporter in today's world.

Frank Goad said:

I heard paul wrote alot of the bible.If this is true how much did he right?

Click to expand...

Don't put your faith into the human who wrote or did something. Judge the information by it's own words.