• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The ontological argument (Anselm and Descarte both) is sound.

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
Think of all possible existence except actual existence. God in imagination would include those right? But that would not make him absolute, to be absolute, you have to include actual existence in his. His Existence is Absolute it includes being in this world as well as all possible existence is dependent on him by definition, as they can only stem from Him.
Thanks for the clarification. Well, is does the fact that you can imagine something mean that the something you imagined is teal? If I imagined that I had a million dollars in my bank account, would it actually be there? No. How do you provide objective, verifiable evidence that this imaginary being exists in reality?
 
Top