• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

When horses die do thire spirits go to heaven?

Nova2216

Active Member
Do animals go to heaven?

Only if they have a soul which lives on after physical death.

Can this be proven? - Yes!

In (1Peter 3:20) we read the following.

...in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

This is referring to Noah and his family and not animals.

This proves animals do not have a soul like men.

Thanks
 

Shad

Veteran Member
I ask this because 2 Kings 2:11 and 2 Kings 6:17.And Ecclesiastes 3:20.And Ecclesiastes 3:21.And Ecclesiastes 12:7.And Ecclesiastes 3:19.Could the horses have been made of matter and not spirit?:confused:

Only Dogs go to Heaven
 

SalixIncendium

अग्निविलोवनन्दः
Staff member
Premium Member
Do animals go to heaven?

Only if they have a soul which lives on after physical death.

Can this be proven? - Yes!

In (1Peter 3:20) we read the following.

...in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

This is referring to Noah and his family and not animals.

This proves animals do not have a soul like men.

Thanks

Congratulations! You’re the superior species!

Here’s hoping you feel better about you after posting this. :heart:
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Do animals go to heaven?

Only if they have a soul which lives on after physical death.

Can this be proven? - Yes!

In (1Peter 3:20) we read the following.

...in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

This is referring to Noah and his family and not animals.

This proves animals do not have a soul like men.

Thanks
How does it prove that? You're citing the Bible as if it were an authoritative text. Where is the actual evidence ?
 

Nova2216

Active Member
The Bible is all the proof I need.

Prove all things.(1Thess.5:21)

There were many animals on the ark but only eight people (souls).
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The Bible is all the proof I need.

Prove all things.(1Thess.5:21)

There were many animals on the ark but only eight people (souls).
You don't understand evidence, how to evaluate it or what constitutes proof. Your faith is blind, and built on sand.
 

Agnostisch

Egyptian Man
I ask this because 2 Kings 2:11 and 2 Kings 6:17.And Ecclesiastes 3:20.And Ecclesiastes 3:21.And Ecclesiastes 12:7.And Ecclesiastes 3:19.Could the horses have been made of matter and not spirit?:confused:
According to the Bible... Heaven is severely under populated and Hell is over populated.
I guess Christ riding on a white horse. Hmmm maybe it's just dogs that aren't allowed in Heaven.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I'm waiting for evidence. I"m willing to listen.

Thanks
Evidence of what? My remark was based on the fact that you already believed, without evidence.
I'd be interested in evidence of God as well, should any ever be found.
 

Nova2216

Active Member
All the evidence one needs is in the universe.

This helps to prove Gods existence.

Where else would they come from?

Stars / Earth

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
(Rom.1:16-20).
 

Nova2216

Active Member
Evidence of what? My remark was based on the fact that you already believed, without evidence.
I'd be interested in evidence of God as well, should any ever be found.

Your remark was based on an assumption.

God placed the universe around us to help prove His existence.

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: (Rom.1:18-20).
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Your remark was based on an assumption.

God placed the universe around us to help prove His existence.

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: (Rom.1:18-20).
What am I assuming, that you disagree with?

I'm still waiting for you to explain what this evidence of god is.
A quotation from the Bible is not evidence, any more than a quotation from Lord of the Rings is evidence of hobbits.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
What you call "sand"
I call the word of God.
And some people call the Rig-Veda the word of God, others prefer the Quran or the Guru Granth. Which one is correct? How are we to evaluate them?

I call it sand because it's not a stable foundation supporting your belief system.

A claim is not evidence. Writing claims in a book does not support the claim. Claims must be supported by real evidence to be valid.
 

Nova2216

Active Member
And some people call the Rig-Veda the word of God, others prefer the Quran or the Guru Granth. Which one is correct? How are we to evaluate them?

I call it sand because it's not a stable foundation supporting your belief system.

A claim is not evidence. Writing claims in a book does not support the claim. Claims must be supported by real evidence to be valid.

One can tell which book is the word of God by the truth found within.

It will have no contradictions.

It will harmonize with history.

It will be truth. (Jn 17:17)

17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. (Jn 17:17)

Alleged Bible Discrepancies

Apologetics Press
 

Nova2216

Active Member
And some people call the Rig-Veda the word of God, others prefer the Quran or the Guru Granth. Which one is correct? How are we to evaluate them?

I call it sand because it's not a stable foundation supporting your belief system.

A claim is not evidence. Writing claims in a book does not support the claim. Claims must be supported by real evidence to be valid.

One can tell which book is the word of God by the truth found within.

It will have no contradictions.

It will harmonize with history.

It will be truth. (Jn 17:17)

17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. (Jn 17:17)

Alleged Bible Discrepancies

Apologetics Press
 
Top